Profile of CookiezNcreem

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

General Information
Register Time: 19 Dec 2013, 18:31 PM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/CookieZR6
Website: http://steamcommunity.com/groups/USFOPCOH2/members
Steam: 76561198094724817
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Indiana/Knox
Game Name: CookiezNcreem

Show Latest Posts


Thread: [1v1Assgrens beat rangers?!?8 Aug 2016, 18:28 PM Your opponent outranks you expeirence wise immensely. You have like 46 games as usf, he has almost 500 games as ostheer total. SO even though the ranks are somewhat even, he's simply more expierienced and as a result, is way better than you, which aggravates alot of the issues below but eh. ill say this though; youll never improve in any sort of meaningful amount of time by only playing people your level. rushing the center church isnt all that important now that you have a mortar as USF. Youd be better off rushing this house cluster, securing them, and then securing the fuel instead of rushing the church on this map this doesnt work because theyres only 1 window on this building on this side. Out of the 7 guys you had in there onnly 1 GUY was firing at the assgrens. Which is why that engagement went so poorly, and why you lost your RE, etc. and of course Again, you rushed the wrong house which doesnt help this. As I told you before in Ask the strategist you're supposed to 2v1 assault grens, or use a garrison. But only if the garrison has enough windows so that most or your entire squad can fire Im sorry I forgot to mention that mechanic, as I assumed you knew. Theres alot of map guides around here to start you off on knowing the best buildings: Kholdony Ferma Map guide Angoville map guide but you should Load up a custom game with all the 1v1 maps and check the sides of popular buildings for windows! Or learn it over time. Or use ALT+Mouse drag to observe the building for yourself during a game.(not recommended if youre already struggling with micro) General rule: If you cant, engage under the right conditions then just retreat. Fast. Theres nothing wrong with a fast retreat against assault grenadiers. Just come back stronger. 2x ranger is almost never a good idea in 1v1 Rangers are great squads with great stats but are balanced by their cost. 400 mp x 2 is 800 manpower and 800 manpower is a FUCK TON. Never get more than 1 ranger or you will 'bleed out' Doesnt matter if he has a bunch of assault grens. use cheaper units properly.(Riflemen) Not the most expensive specialized one. Coh2 can be illogical like that. YOU MAKE ALOT OF MICRO MISTAKES Too many to count And im not the one to roast you on basic micro mistakes if you're a newer player as that comes over TIME. Theres times where youre too slow to retreat, too slow to move your captain to attack a vehiclke, etc. as above i wont go into this too much because naturally your opponent will tax your micro if he's better. And as such this will improve over time. There was a sequence where You lost your stuart, you bought an extra ranger squad instead of an Anti tank gun when you saw the STUG E, and as a result you get punished by stug-e spam. If you had bought an AT gun or two instead of the rangers and kept your stuart alive you wouldve won in 15 minutes, flat Instead your DOUBLE at gun is late and again, you're bleeding like crazy because 2 rangers. Pershing tips You used the AT guns properly with it at times but you didnt really use the armor piercing rounds ability on it which allows oyu to fire two shots in quick succession You lost your pershing both times because you drove it in fron of a tiger and a pak40 with no anti tank gun OR JACKSON support. No jackson? BECAUSE YOU DIDNT... Tech UP. When you already have a pershing, and you also have 300 fuel. Please tech up. If you dont you're just opening yourself up for a comeback. And it doesnt matter how good you are with the pershing, you are handicapping yourself by not getting a jackson and other units out to support it. You are forcing the pershing to take all the damage and do all the damage, which is extremely unrealistic expectation wise. It was gg the moment you bought a 2nd pershing instead of teching. Seriously. 37 minutes in and you hit 300 fuel at least 3 times. tech up. And Assgrens beat rangers! Bazookas and AT grenades are ineffective vs Stug E and the pershing is made of tin foil. Stug e's get decimated by bazookas at nades and at guns, all of which are avaialbe to usf before the stug es arrive. ill repeat what I said earlier: If you had bought an AT gun or two instead of the rangers and kept your stuart alive you wouldve won in 15 minutes, flat And yes the pershing gives the impression of being made of tinfoil when you drive right in front of a pak40 and a tiger by its lonesome without teching to support units And your rangers actually won a lot of ridiculous engagements, at one point your rangers even beat a vet 3 ass gren and a vet 3 pregren at once before having to retreat... I actually never saw where your rangers lost to assgrens. So dont be all quick to blame the units. If ass grens beat your rangers.... its your fault In: Replay Reviews
Thread: [1vs1] USF vs Wehr Minsk Pocket6 Aug 2016, 16:17 PM TLDR: You tunnel visioned the middle way, way too hard like you literally just kept running into the middle for a good 30 minutes when all he had was a bunker defending the right for the longest time. Even after you finally mortared the bunker you never sent a squad to capture the right. You never set up a flank or put any pressure on him from the right EVER. You actually NEVER decapped the far VP. USE THE WHOLE MAP! Cannot stress this enough. But you Just stalingrad tactics into the middle and the mortar(double mortar) was giving you wipes. At the end I think it gave you at least half of your kills total. Not gonna cut it at some point. -didnt have an AT gun 15 minutes into the game=very bad -you relied on the mortar wayy too much for your damage dealt tbh. I know, Yes its a shitty map and arty spam is king but if you want to truly be a terror you shouldve and very easily couldve flanked around and attacked him from multiple angles. -If you had an at gun for your push on the command p4 around 21 mins where you l;ost your first sherman you wouldve killed it for sure, instead it got away and you traded horribly, AND that sherman got abandonded and did a number on you later -he killed his own command p4 lol but notice how the second time you went in on it, you were able to take it down/abandon it because you finally got an AT gun and had it set up for your push. but yeah, back to flanking. When you hear the term smoke n flank its literally that easy. Buy some smoke and literally go around where his guns arent pointing, and also attack from the front all at once. If you have multiple vehicles for multiple push angles, even better Please try to poke and prod at territory you think might be unconstested. Its actually worth it to buy a 2nd RE for some sweepers or as a zook platform and use them to back cap. Once you know its safe, send a couple rifles over there and set up a flank here let me draw a bad picture, right click on it and open in new tab to see fullsize. Red spray paint is what shouldve been your territory. Literally uncontested. Red arrow is your artillery firing on him, and the black arrows are you vehicles and riflemen coming in from the side. Are you afraid that he will turn his units and shoot you or something? Ill be honest with you most players outside the top 200 will not preemptively turn their team weapons when expecting flanks. This is seriously the easiest way to roflstomp an ostheer player that isnt very good with positioning. SImply come in from the side. Come from the most obtuse angle, but come with all you got. As in dont come with just one squad flanking, flank multiple ways at full power. Combine that with your mortar. And you will be going somewhere with usf and you'll frustrate even the best ostheer players. And frustrated ostheer players will tilt. And tilting ostheer players tend to lose. Are you worried he'll 'meet' your flank?? Best case scenario; is hes forced to spread out, which for you means isolated ostheer units are easy pickings. Also when you see the stuka cas, move evne if you think the planes dont see you. The first strafe you got what was coming to you, you were way too slow to move out of the circle. But overall just getting double bars, a bunch of mortars and charging in is very bad, very lazy, and fits soviet play much more infact, and yes, you're very lucky you won as he threw away his armor at the end LOL that was crazy. But yeah hopefully im not sounding too harsh, but I really want to emphasize to you that you should come from multiple angles as usf. If you're losing squads on retreat or barely doing anything then you're not coming hard enough. (thats what she said) In: Replay Reviews
Thread: [1vs1] USF vs Wehr Minsk Pocket6 Aug 2016, 15:36 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Aug 2016, 15:27 PMOutsider_Sidaroth It's fine guys, it wasn't a really good replay anyway, I just really don't like that map. ill watch...if its 'broken' or whatever then maybe submit another one. but keep in mind we know we're not watching tournament replays here. the replay could be god awful. Our duty; is to watch it anyway In: Replay Reviews
Thread: OKW6 Aug 2016, 15:34 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Aug 2016, 14:45 PMSorang Awww!! Thankies a lot for the tips!! (´ ワ `)" I'll try hard to do remember the tips and to do better on next game! If I upload another replay later, should I upload it on here? or should I make a new thread for it? make another thread, 8) and remember; 1 replay at any one time In: Replay Reviews
Thread: State Office Rules5 Aug 2016, 14:48 PM Welcome to the state office, the first step to 'getting gud' is acknowledging you need help and that YOU are at fault when it comes to losing games! I want to go over something really quickly, The overall Site Rules apply You can find them here They will be enforced to a much stricter standard from now on. However we also want to emphasize PRODUCTIVE REPLIES ONLY No Trolling No shitposting No insults of any kind towards any one NO BALANCE ARGUMENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The state office or Strategy Forum is the place on COH2.ORG where you can get away from the typical trolling, low quality response, balance whine, aka, 'shit-posts' that are usually found in COH2 Central and become a better or smarter player in one way or another. If you break any of the rules above, or the site rules in this forum, from this day forward, you risk your post being removed, or your thread moved as a warning. For repeat violations your account may be timed out and your posting priveleges revoked without warning. Again, we have a dream with this forum. We have a dream that one day, this forum will be more popular than the Coh2 balance forum. Any attempt to derail that dream will be met with harsh repercussion, aka a ban-hammer. Dont test it. Thank you for understanding. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Advanced British Trench Facilities4 Aug 2016, 00:55 AM the trench is the british 'equivalent' to the ostheer and okw bunkers, and the usf fighting pit, all of which cannot be stolen either. Comparing it to the ostheer one is wierd to me because its two totally different factions. Relic was pretty lazy to just reuse the model from the ostheer one which in turn unnecessarily draws this comparison between the two imo(btw allow ostheer one to garrison a mortar again) The way the vickers vets, aka vet 1 with the increased range in buildings(trenches) implies that it is designed for being put in trenches. so, Conclusion: The trench is designed to be used as a unique occupyable MG nest/bunker for a vetted vickers. It can be used for tommies too, but using it as a bunker is without a doubt the best usage of the trench. Allowing it to be capturable by any pleb would be overly punishing to the british faction, which is riding a fine line between batshit op and weak as a noodle How about we make them actually die to attacks, mortars, or whatever. like ordinary bunkers first, before we essentially remove the trench from the game In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Angreifen vs Spanky3 Aug 2016, 22:57 PM arrivederci spanks In: Replays
Thread: rear echelon squad volley fire2 Aug 2016, 23:25 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2016, 22:00 PMUnited Does volley fire with other RE's stack? and is it more effective the closer you are to the target? Its more effective the closer you are as the RE squad, along with just about everything else small arms in the game fires faster the closer you get. More shots= more suppression going out. You may not feel that in actuality though as the squad takes increased damage while doing the ability, so those sturm pioneers charging you could care less about your extra suppression, you'll like drop 1-2 models immediately at the most effective suppression range. The best possible scenario of using volley fire is from garrison against a squad that's right next to the garrison. In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: Maxim vs OKW issue1 Aug 2016, 20:55 PM even funnier when a soviet adds a doucheka into the mix. Good luck accomplishing anything vs a good Soviet player with a dooshka on the wrong map. Who am I kidding its every map. If it's open you're screwed, if it's full of buildings you're screwed They definitely need LEIG smoke and a total rehaul. yet again In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing buff?31 Jul 2016, 16:20 PM Moved. For reference, Coh2 central is for stuff like this, adding units and whatnot is COH2 gameplay. Coh2 balance is "Sturmpiooners OP" COh2 bugs is "USF mortar fires sturmtiger shells" Lobby is for news, or general community based discussion, "new tournament on the way!" etc. The state office is basically the L2play forum, "Im struggling with ____ how to counter?" In: COH2 Gameplay