Profile of JHeartless

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1637

General Information
Steam: 76561198006521729


Thread: The state of CoH27 Apr 2014, 15:18 PM No but what you are doing is using an argument to justify what most players think is op by saying what they have is op and using that for justification. Further you are calling people who believe said unit is out of balance are fanboys. Fact is Panther has over performed or soviet at has been under performing for a very long time. This needs to be adjusted. And hopefully next patch it will. After all if the soviets lack their AI advantage Ost shouldn't be left with an AT advantage. The Panther has been enjoying a lot if indirect buffs. SU85 adjustment, cost decrease, AT nade multi nerf vet armor boost and the RAM rework Etc. the only way to deal with it efficiently and punish its massive armor and hp having self was with stolen shreks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The state of CoH27 Apr 2014, 14:50 PM Bear you realize 82mm prec strike got a nerf. Honestly guards nade is better IMHO. If they are clearing paks you have really really bad luck. And werfers don't need vet 1 to clear a zis. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Patch added so much tactical depth... really? Not ironic7 Apr 2014, 14:20 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2014, 14:12 PMWiFiDi i think this result is because the balance is off not so much that the patch intentionally lowered depth . Yep. Just making the distinction. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: To those supporting this patch's "balance"...7 Apr 2014, 13:55 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2014, 03:02 AMWhat Doth Life?! I feel like it should be mandatory to have your playercard displayed on the forum if you want to make balance threads XD In that case why are YOU posting.... MVGame In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Make conscripts and grenadiers more equal7 Apr 2014, 13:52 PM Yes but now the soviets have even more micro tax to pay. Model per model scripts always were weaker than the übermensch but more models made them equal. Let's go back to that it worked. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Patch added so much tactical depth... really? Not ironic7 Apr 2014, 13:48 PM BO is strategy. Micro and positioning is tactical. They screwed the strategic depth to improve the tactical depth. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Shreked PGrens... Balanced or no?7 Apr 2014, 13:44 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2014, 13:25 PMWiFiDi i think the problem is when you build them in mass. and is probably highlighted more so in this patch as tier 2 is very powerful for germans now. while tier 3 and 4 for svos is so hard to get to. in previous patches ive heard you can kite them with m5 aa trucks really effectively . M5 can until the Ostwind shows up. The T34 and T70 should be able to kite them better then they can currently. I am on travel currently. So I can't run any experiments. But last patch I could kill a Pgren squad with vanilla scripts faster on average than a T34 barring luck RNG. And that was without trying to kite. In team games now you deal with a pair of them. With two each burst takes 2/3 the health of a T34. And since T34s kill them so slow who wants to risk a tank to get maybe two entity kills. Honestly I need more T34s on the field to reliably deal with a pair if shrekd Pgrens then a single Panther and that to me is wrong. What next is relic going to force players to rM Pgrens? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shreked PGrens... Balanced or no?5 Apr 2014, 23:34 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2014, 23:26 PMwooof dont get so defensive. you made a false claim and you couldnt back it up. schrecked pgrens now kill faster than schrecked pgrens in the old patch, but thats not what you claimed. nothing in these sentences is true except that pgrens lost armor. you dont think other infantry getting stronger relative to pgrens is relevant to pgren balance? maybe thats why you keep complaining about t70s t34s and tank destroyers dieing to them. You are plain rude. The tone you use elicits that sort of response. Soviet AI going after Pgrens are only good up close and out of cover to close the distance where they get owned. Pgrens have needed adjustment since the last armor nerf IMHO. It's silly to seem infantry own AI tanks in any scenario ever. Further it's now a case of what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Soviet AI has suffered so had the zis this patch. German AT should be toned down. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shreked PGrens... Balanced or no?5 Apr 2014, 23:28 PM Reduce moving some of the moving accuracy penalty to allow better kiting or any other Aoe type change to allow it to better punish infantry that are just lol siting in front of the gun. Or another route would be to give soviets infantry at that threatens German armor in a similar fashion. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shreked PGrens... Balanced or no?5 Apr 2014, 23:10 PM Mirrors equal mortars silly predictive text In: COH2 Balance