Profile of Gdot

1. what i was saying is that even most AT games, it is scrub mopping.

2. yeah that statement disgusts me. who said that? not me.

3. i'm sorry that while you were rolling with perhaps the best 3v3 at team, you gained a head size of montana, but i don't think i whined. the chart clearly shows that in 4v4 randoms, axis is ezmode. i was just commenting on your big headness.

4. because most AT v. AT is still very one sided, it would produce result as useless as the one right now in terms of trying to use that specific data to balance 3v3+.

alternative? use other forms of data. i.e. how stug, FHQ or CAS does in 3v3+.

1. Yes, the point of the remedy suggested was to use AT vs AT (top 25 for 4v4AT) to show how these teams stack up against one another. These games are often very competitive. What possible data could you gather from the top 200 random where most teams make the top 200 just by completing 10 games? A scaling effect would work on all game modes aside from 1s.

2. my apologies

3. Yes I ride the coat tails of my teammates, have a huge dick, and rightfully so since 4v4AT is the most elite game mode on coh2. YOU ARE COMPARING DATA ON 4v4 RANDOMMMMM. If you need an in depth explanation on why this is a bad idea you can read some of the earlier comments or read what legends' wrote. He himself said this was an inconclusive data set for many reason and planned on a revision.

4. Again, this is why some people suggested using a scaling effect when regarding team games. When top 4v4 teams play the games are often competitive and not one-sided.

The objective is overall balance. Not unit/commander specific. Go try plugging all that information into your data set and see what the results look like. Not to mention how time consuming it would be.

Lets say we do what Vort says, and let the base defenders balance the game. You don't think cruz, ciez, jesulin or any other of the elite upper echelon won't discover a way to be successful and dominate a majority of their opponents? These are the players that have shown the greatest understanding of the game. It is only sensible that we allow them to craft balance. This will give us the greatest chance at achieving overall balance.

However, the winrates are still extremely lopsided in 4v4

They sure are

This notion needs to stop. Not only is it untrue, but its giving fodder to newer players to cry balance rather than attempt to do a self evaluation. The perception of balance and actual balance are completely out of whack, IMO. Are there balance issues? Yes. Will there always be balance issues? Yes. Am I losing because of balance? NOOOOOOO.

Balance is not affecting 99% of the 4v4AT games being played. People just want to assume they are losing because of balance; its an easier pill to swallow than looking at ones own faults.

This brings me back to my original point. So when one loses, they say I lost because of balance and therefore what I did during the game was the correct approach and its the game that needs to change and not me. This stifles creativity and learning. This has been one of the most prevelant contributing factors to the toxicity of this community, and the worst part is - its an unwarranted self manifestation.

I removed the taskbar so player names are not involved.

There are 2 barrages near the beginning. The 2nd one (stuka) you can see the target reticle on the tac-map for an instant before it fires. It's below the last sighted location of the su-85.

Skip to 3:30 for the last one, which was a double barrage. I couldn't skip ahead without the taskbar.

Just to be clear this was 44-46 in the replay file.

That last one was very suspicious. If you look at the dot on the tactical map the barrage is bulls eyed on the top of the ISU-152.

you meant this one? That is obviously a real hack Kappa (Gdot)

http://gyazo.com/a2970226f0ae1e16b684fad3fd93f255

Haha no. I will ask him where he got it. I know he said he used a free one and got banned - proceeded to buy another account and is using a paid hack now. Inverse knows more about this then I, so its possible he could get caught/banned.

This is the type of scum we are up against though. I could rat him out, but one hes terrible at the game, two, it ultimately will not solve anything as these gulag scums just buy another account.

Hopefully relic will do something proactive to combat this.

You also have quite a record for new player.

I don't know what to believe anymore. So many Caitlyn Jenners.