Profile of skemshead

Jump back to quoted post23 Sep 2016, 11:42 AMAustralian Magic

Huh, wonder what it's your top 10 Ostheer problems vs other factions then.

Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2016, 23:41 PMAustralian Magic

If USF player goes for 2RF+1Mortar it means you can easily punish him for that becasue your field presence will be greater.

USF needed mortar to be able to fight with HMG/buildings without mandatory nades - that was the point of mortar.
USF were forced to go for nades always vs HMG/Buildings so putting mortat behind nades does not have any sense becasue it was to be able to skip nades.

It's not good when a faction is forced to do something becasue there are no other tools.

Jump back to quoted post21 Aug 2016, 23:52 PMsquippy

it's hard to know what specifically was the issue without a replay or vid.

Jump back to quoted post21 Aug 2016, 21:16 PMskyshark

This is a great point and something I didn't think about. Otherwise, I'm ok with static units having an advantage. Late game there's usually a lot of yellow cover around from craters. I'd just prefer to see players punished for charging over open ground when bounding from cover to cover is possible but takes more micro.

I think the biggest thing preventing this from being effective is that it'd drastically change the infantry game and slow it down... And relic is pretty much done with big changes at this point.