Profile of spam.r33k

Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2015, 19:39 PMsigah

I did not say that it doesnt affect the game. But specific gameplay changes (increase/decrease cost/buildtime/cooldown/damage/armor/healh/..., nerf/buff unit/faction, ...) is not the same. You cant please everybody. And in comparison to other "competitive" games CoH2 has a big fan boy factor. So yes they should at least give a fuck about customer wishes according to balance wishes. (not about content wishes for example).

€: And you think browsing threads at coh2.org will give a better overview which balance changes are necessary. Dream on.

Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2015, 18:32 PMsigah

If I was a dev or part of the relic staff, I would give a shit about balance suggestion made by the community. I would just study the intern game and match statistics and maybe be in contact with the progamers and top players. Most of the rest is subjective bullshit and fanboy wishes.

I personally (as a not highskilled CoH2-player) try to get a long with every patch and not to flame about it, because as long as there are players who are far better than me there is room for personal improvment (beside a possible not optimal balance)

Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2015, 18:41 PMLemonJuice

this is how relic balances the games for the most part.

Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2015, 07:37 AMTalore

This is elitist nonsense. Even ignoring the fact that CoH2 has a largely casual player-base compared to games like Starcraft 2, gaining feedback from all levels of play is vital for good game design. If Relic can make the game less frustrating and more enjoyable at all levels, that builds up a solid player-base. This in turn boosts sales, increasing funding and making continued, quality support for CoH2 in Relic's best interests.

tl;dr it doesn't take a top 200 to tell that things like plane crashes are universally negative game experiences.