I'm with tuvok, you could get an LMG before either race has 2CP. Then yes of course at 2CP (not long after), all cons can have Ppsh.
That's all he was saying.
Balance wise, we'll have to see how that plays out over lots of games. I imagine it makes cons feel similarish to ass grens for a short while until Germans get upgrades and PGs out.
|
|
I really like penals with guard doctrines, gives a good boost to AI.
I've been using 2 con, 2 penal, 2 guard quite a lot. Don't bother getting molos. Use cons to reinforce penals where you can. |
|
The tigers weapon range IS longer than standard sight range. (I've used the bulletin).
So it does make the tiger more lethal particularly if pushing into their base.
However, it's probably not worth it because your telling opponent in load screen what your going to do. And it's no use if you don't make it that far lol. |
|
Moscow winter fuel is very harrasable.. from the cut off point. |
|
why do you build a stug? to counter tanks. Why do you build a pak? To counter tanks.
With those units you will be able to save even faster for a Tiger, which will complement them very nicely.
|
|
Nullist, Im not getting into a troll war with you, seen as it seems to be your favorite past time.
I didnt say people dont do T3. I said ''for a long time'' most people went with T4, out of nescesity for decent AT. I myself never liked the SU85 even when it was OP, simply for micro reasons, Ive always played with T3 to be aggresive.
Of course most Soviets do T3 now the T34 is buffed nicely.
Im not attacking German players (rofl), just saying there are currently undersued units which will fill a roll of German AT quite well, particularly in this situation of T34/85 spam.
So that is relevant to this balance discussion.
I will reword my final comment, if it offends you less:
Now soviets have a couple strats with heavy tank use, Germans have not yet adapted their builds propperly by using the dedicated tank killing units. |
|
Thing is people have relied on the multi purpose tank, because they have been able to.
Meanwhile for a long time soviets were virtually forced to play with assault gun.
Now soviets have a couple strats with heavy tank use, Germans don't want to adapt propperly by using the dedicated tank killing units. |
|
I voiced my concearns about the fuels on Semoisky as soon as it came out.
Main issue for me was that you didnt need to care about the two sectors by your base (ie the old +10 fuel and +10 munis).
You could just push one large army out of the front of your base, easily controling one fuel and one muni.
In the origional Semois, if you went hard in the middle, your fuel could get stolen, keeping your fuel secure, and also manging to connect one of the high muni points, was a bit of a stretch, which was good. |
|
Yes yes yes.
Or better yet, have anything purley AT (paks, ZiS, SU85, Elefant etc), only fire at vehicles, unless you click command it to do so.
Its so annoying to have a long ranged AT unit try to watch a choke point from afar, but continually rotate in an attempt to fire at some random infantry miles away from the direction you want it facing.. when it has very little chance of actually hitting anything. |
It's kinda sad that the PPSH got nerfed. What's the point of them now? A tiny increase in DPS is not worth one of your commander slots. If the old ppsh was too cheap, they should have just made it more expensive.
It's not sad, they were OP, mistakenly OP. |
Charlie Dont Surf
Relic Entertainment
