Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: List of my Suggestions for Balance with reasoning27 Jul 2020, 01:54 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2020, 00:44 AMthomasagray Because it seems to me that you suggest that ALL my changes NEVER GONNA HAPPEN. Your originally first 7 points will never happen. Either because it can't be done, it doesn't accomplish what you wish for or it makes the game worst. 8- Heavy tanks are at the timing they should be at. 9- It can be done, but i don't think it should be done. It's similar to Volks situation after STG. 10- Not the best moment to buff the Bren Carrier while the change wouldn't be as impactful as i think it would be arriving a bit too late. 11- The acceleration is good but i don't think it's justified to buff the unit ATM by giving it panzer tactician. Not to mention that we should stir away from insta "get out of jail" abilities as the default sherman smoke dispensers is a better design ability. 12- I can't remember ever been a case on which i thought a sandbag needed repair as opposed to just building another. But i don't see a reason for that to not be the case. YAY it took 12 suggestions for 1 to be good enough. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why don't Shocks require upgrades?27 Jul 2020, 01:37 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2020, 00:36 AMBlebfeesh A well answered question in only 6 posts? I'm not used to this level of competence on this forum. But then I'd ask how do Thompson Paras and Rangers fit into this dynamic? Is it just because Thompsons Stronk that they have 90 muni upgrade costs? Thompson are stronger (around 50%) and are equipped on fewer models (better focus fire and less DPS lost) while the basic carbine is already pretty decent. The assault ability is also part of the upgrade. They have more utility and versatility with different upgrades (1919/Bar/Elite Zook). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why don't Shocks require upgrades?26 Jul 2020, 16:17 PM Because we had Shocks requiring upgrades and that was a far worst concept. Both gameplay and balance wise. 1- 6 PPSH means that they have a consistent DPS decrease with each model down. 2- Armor by default (which is nothing other than received accuracy with another name for 95% of situations) makes them been expensive therefore you can actually bleed someone going for more than 1 or 2 of them. 3- Long range performance units are easier, safer and have greater potential than short range units. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Toxic26 Jul 2020, 16:01 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jul 2020, 12:50 PMKoRneY Anecdotal evidence blaming Americans as being the worst and I get a post invised for referencing my wife and daughters for being 'political'. I'm actually genuinely confused about the moderation. Quote the part on which i said Americans are the worst? It's just a cultural thing. Which is neither right or wrong, just different. I've family leaving in the USA, talked with many people from there and consume media from it. Different societies have different sensible topics. From years of exchanging conversation and interaction over the internet it's pretty clear that cursing is seen in a far worst light than many other countries, even if we were to limit it to only English speakers. I've seen too many people censor themselves over the word fuck while WRITING over the net. God forbid you use the word nigger. Meanwhile Australians throwing cunt whenever they can or Scottish/Whales calling you a fannybaw or cockwomble. I'm willing to concede that for non native English people societies, English slurs and swear words have less of an impact as you don't generally use it on a day by day basis and that trying to convert terms might come with a different interpretation. So we won't feel offended by the specific word used rather than the intention behind the message. While for english speaker, it might sounds more aggressive than intended. In: Lobby
Thread: Toxic25 Jul 2020, 19:26 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Jul 2020, 17:25 PMMr Carmine I also get what your saying. Those who actualy lack the mental capacity are imo few. They also dont complain as much i feel. The tend to full nuclear on chat as well. The vast majority of people who complain about mean words online have lived in fairy land and got treated with kid gloves, noone ever said anything mean to them or critisized them. Becoming highly entitled and offended by everything. This happend accros the west unfortunatly. This has to stop. I dont want rules and certain words getting you banned out of the bleu. Giving in to the complainers just makes them demand more of the same. I agree with the concept that slurs and other profanity words and simple words and the problem is the intention behind them. Through experience, it seems mostly the Americans who are more triggered by the existence of those words more than anyone else. The thing is, if you don't know how to communicate properly or give up easily in a toxic pointless spiral on chat, you might as well lose that right to use it. Keep playing while been muted. Jump back to quoted post25 Jul 2020, 18:46 PMBaba bachelor in psychology or just hobby psychiatrist? nice insight though It's actually kinda true. At least in this genre/game. Have you seen the Day9 vid? Do you think a 12 year old kid is playing CoH2? No, it's the 20/50 year old who likes WW2 who is frustrated with the game, studies, work, family, whatever who slashes out cause on top of having a stressful moment in life, the game is also making him stressed. And whatever is happening in the game makes him feel justified to vent out to whoever is in proximity cause things don't go the way they think they should go. In: Lobby
Thread: Toxic25 Jul 2020, 15:46 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Jul 2020, 08:04 AMMr Carmine That's why we should take all the online voice chat and typed chat wich is negative or trolling with a grain of salt. They are not in your face, they cant get fysical, its mostly just venting frustration. People take chat in games way to seriously. As if it hurts them fysicly when some1 calls them names. People being soft is the issue. They need to listen and learn from this old saying: sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me. Only outright threats or racism and calls for violence should be flagged and adressed. Not every mean or trolling thing said is toxic. This toxic stuff also blows everything way and away out of preportion. While i think in the same way, you have to realise not everyone else is in the same position or have the mental strength to ignore it or deflect it. Stick and stones can make superficial wounds. Words can leave invisible scars. As far as punishments and sanctions goes, the problem is that the game doesn't have an effective way to report them nor act proportionally to the offense. Minor toxicity should just be met with a mute/chat ban. Bigger threats as the one you mentioned should be the ones punished with bans. Jump back to quoted post25 Jul 2020, 13:10 PMBaba i dont know if you just randomly picked this comment of mine to respond, but if you read the whole thing you will see i spoke out against a voicechat but no, i dont think i would want to draw on a map while grenades and other types of shells are wiping my units the moment i look away What the game needs is a better ping system. What i envision is a simple and a extended ping wheel system. For fast commands, single click is the current ping. While click n drag should allow for a cross pad panel which adds danger, retreat, attack/defend (based on territory ownership), mine/explosive (?). on another button would be a triangle based system which lets you ping infantry/support weapon/vehicles which if dragged expands into more specific ones. Say sniper/blob, mg/at gun/mortar/howitzer, LV/Medium/heavy/TD/Arty In: Lobby
Thread: AVRE vs SturmTiger 24 Jul 2020, 14:07 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2020, 11:16 AMullumulu Sturmtiger is so much harder to get work... Wanna see a good example? Here u go: https://youtu.be/5m5RNk9MQC8 1h game. Sturmtiger had after 40min only 1 model killed and was vet 0...after it shot all the reload was ready U pasted the wrong game or didn't pay attention close enough. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Indirect fire performance - A comparison23 Jul 2020, 20:18 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2020, 17:49 PMHannibal Very nice work, thank you! Interesting to see how the 120 mm performs so well, yet people (me included) usually do not use it much and it has a bad reputation. So either this is a unit that is not recognized enough at the moment or this hints to other problems (like the constant repositioning this unit is doing). Cost, popcap, repositioning and aiming, veterancy. The test implies all mortars start shooting at the same time. If we were talking pre mortar nerfs, the 120mm was bad. Nowadays i would say the performance is adequate, just with a slight cost/pop/vet adjustments needed. Mortars are not that great with "afk" mode so you need to get the most use of them with barrage. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Main gun crit23 Jul 2020, 17:05 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2020, 16:05 PMSander93 I wouldn't mind if instead of completely disabling the gun, a main gun critical would instead impose a severe accuracy penalty so at least the vehicle isn't completely defenceless. Engine damage doesn't completely disable movement either. Although ideally things like a main gun crit would also be something that has to be deliberately triggered somehow just like how snares deal engine damage, rather than being something completely random. I would go as far as say that turret lock would be a more interesting crit than pure main gun destroy. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Partisan Anti-Infantry Squads - Cooldown on spawn tweak23 Jul 2020, 15:32 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2020, 14:32 PMVipper ... Does the ST nade start on cd as well? In: COH2 Balance