Profile of elchino7

I guess what you are trying to say is that ostheer is just as good as okw IF you are any good at the game and that OKW is a much more noob friendly faction than Ostheer which can punish you very harshly if you make a big mistake or you get "out skilled" by rng in some cases. Thanks for the head up!

AND that's OH for you for the last 4 years since they rightfully nerf PG + Panther or MG42 spam right back in beta/after release.
There's also an increased amount of difficulty which can be exponential depending on faction, on whether you play meta/cheese or not.

hit and penetrate and the DPS of this units vs medium is very important in their ability to counter them.

Still IMO irrelevant as DPS doesn't translate well into tank vs tank combat as it might do with infantry.
In case of infantry, the sheer amount of models, HP and amount of bullets shot, makes DPS a somehow reliable stat source.

If you are accounting for ONLY 640HP mediums with those armor values, the model you should be looking at is Time to kill based of number of shots.

120dmg: only Su76. It takes 6 shots (80dmg overkill)
140dmg: only vet2 Su76. 5 shots (60dmg OK)
160: most sources. 4 shots (0d OK)
200: FF, Jackson, Command PV mark vehicle. 4 shots (140d OK)
240: Jackson AP, ISU. 3 shots (80d OK)
280: FF vet 3. 3 shots (200d OK)
320: Ele/JT. 2 shots (0d OK)

IB4 "but it doesn't take into account accuracy". That's true. But that ideal DPS doesn't work with vehicles as not all hits in most cases are natural ones due to scatter been a factor as well. You could factor accuracy as a max average non ideal scenario on which scatter hits doesn't occur and then you have a min-max situation.
Ex: Ele/Su76 at their max range respectively have only .55 acc which basically would double the amount of shots required (if we don't account scatter hits). On the other hand, JT has .88 (which puts it at an extra shot) or FF which won't miss.

Note:
-You are also missing M10 on that list.
-I mentioned C. PV mark vehicle cause for all that matters, is the same as using any other munition ability.

maybe...but like i said...in about 1500 games from Dane i seen it maybe 1-3 times.

Not that much. RNG?

Vet5 is not as strong as either getting vet1 (now cloaking has no penalty which is a huge micro relief), vet 3 (guaranteed pen with +25% dmg from stealth) and vet 4 (movement and range increase).


Maybe you should pay more attention? I think we got several vet4/5 raks during GCS, specially when playing call in meta.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9opH1xKQQU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1P5fS_kLrUw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzOX3dVv61s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Wo88FzoQWo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9mOMqiwuac

On teamgames it's easier to achieve due to more targets, but harder to retain (indirect fire).

Getting vet5 raks is not ez but not impossible. Unicorn vet3/vet5 units are Kubels, MG34, ST, Hetzer, M3A1 clowncar, Dodge, Greyhound, Valentine.

Orrrr. Simply only buff the owners units. That would make it fine imo. Keep all current stats. Just reduce buffs to owner

If we go this route, that should apply to ALL commander aura buff type of units. Instead, applying same changes as FRP should be a start.
Improving some other aspects of the FHQ (accessibility/cost) while removing things like the damage modifiers should be better. Damage modifiers are bad bad bad...

but doesn't the cover absorb the projectile of tank too ?

It can collide with the AT gun but factors such as AoE still applies.