Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: So when do Riflemen get an upgrade to six men?20 Jun 2019, 16:09 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Jun 2019, 14:32 PMStug life that's why i said equal rng, we all know full well even pioneer can beat rifle close range if they get lucky and hit all shoots There's no such thing as "equal" RNG. If i say that X wins against Y at certain range, you'll expect it to be in the orders of +70%. With the losing been a fluke. The funny thing is that with any other squad, DPS loss and model sniping are issues when you compare it 1on1. They had PRACTICAL dead even DPS (at that range), model count and RA. The small difference won't skew the result enough to be notorious. Jump back to quoted post19 Jun 2019, 22:06 PMGI John 412 Back on topic: how do people actually feel about a Veteran Sergeant upgrade for Riflemen? You are better opening up a new thread suggesting changes to Rifle Company than posting on a thread where OP is screaming Rifles UP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M36 Jackson20 Jun 2019, 04:01 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Jun 2019, 01:43 AMdistrofio M10 should be stock and M36 doctrinal is my final word. That wouldn't work. "Ideal" world would be M10 non doctrinal and Jackson transformed into a glasscannon or FF clone. At the end of the day, what we will see is just a Jackson cost increase and tangential nerfs (say you could slightly decrease turret rotation and/or lower the armor so it can't deflect anything even at max range). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So when do Riflemen get an upgrade to six men?20 Jun 2019, 03:39 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Jun 2019, 20:39 PMStug life no look back at the dps stats and chart i showed volks have 0.1 more dps at long range but rifle man have 0.3 reduced base received accuracy so with equal RNG rifle beat volks but being a bit unlucky will lead to the volks winning You are badly interpreting stats. It's 0.03 RA. If you are gonna argue that values (multiplied by 5x for the whole squad) around the order of 0.07 dps (30 range) variance make one or the other squad "win" consistently... Heck even by your own parametre, Volks should be winning more since the RA will still give Volks more DPS than Rifles at max range. Heck, i'll count the "overkill" dps loss (-5%) since Volks do 12dmg per shot and this is a vacuum scenario to the death with no other unit involved. If the value is at max range (35), the WHOLE SQUAD of rifles has an edge of 0.16 dps over the Volks squad. If you could run 1 million rounds of this combat, having the Rifles win (grossly exaggerated) 52-55% of the time, wouldn't make far from basically been a 50/50 scenario. You'll see a favourable engagement at range 15-20 and highly favourable below that. Anything going from 28-35 range is a flipcoin. That been said: rifles don't need to be changed. What needs to be address is OKW first 3/5 mins of the game. Remove 30/40mp from the initial bank. Make trucks cost 30/40 less. Split the difference in the total tech cost in the upgrades on both medics/engineers to keep total teching cost equal. If it's too complicated just adjust using the trucks and make OKW get even when they get 2 trucks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Teamgames resource inflation18 Jun 2019, 16:41 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jun 2019, 14:27 PMVipper imo is is quite big. In a 4v4 game caches is actually 4 times more cost efficient. If one one add the fact that research cost is also reduced by the number of units one produces the problem that creates a completely different economy. The time to cap the map and the times sector are contested are also issues but cashes imo are quite a big issue. Indeed but that's also a consequence of not been able to CONTEST THOSE CACHES as well. CACHES matter on the long run. There are other factors which skews things on the early/mid game which is what rose up this discussion. OP: map resource points can't be changed as in CoH1 (low/high). Variables to take into account as to why teamgames can be problematic. -Manpower. Yes, each player has it's own personal income, but in the wider perspective, you are putting up to 4x more manpower into the map which leads to... -Popcap. The amount of strategic, fuel, muni and victory points don't differ too much from mode to mode and from map to map. You still only need a single model of a squad (or special vehicle with ability) to cap a point. Even if the maps are bigger, points are been capped simultaneously by 4x players for a team. This also makes harassing territory not ideal, as there's no "empty" spaces in the map. Same with VPs, you have more players than VPs to contest and defend. -Teching. More players means more units. More units means it's highly likely that specialized units will have enough targets to pay for themselves. This also makes skipping certain techs, which leaves gaps in an army composition on 1v1, ideal as you can rely on your teammates to cover for you. My approach to the problem: Caches: Same as with the OH Opel Blitz, caches should only reward the player who built it. Rollback cost to 200mp. In teamgames, any player can "attach" themselves up to any cache for 200mp. Dubious if OKW should be able to build caches or only be able to "attach". Strategic resource points: not sure if possible. Depending on number of players, increase time required to cap a flag but decreased time to DECAP a flag proportionately. Random numbers as an example: 1v1: it takes 30s to transform an enemy point. 15s to decap, 15s to cap. 2v2: 12s to DC, 18s to C. 3v3: 10s to DC, 20s to C. 4v4: 8s to DC, 22s to C. Make harassing a viable optional choice, as it takes "more time" for the defenders to recover and connect the territory lost. This also makes the early game slightly slower, as it takes more time to cap neutral territories. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How does RNG work here?18 Jun 2019, 15:54 PM Reminder that even if you are hugging the enemy tank, you might miss if you are moving the tank. I'm not 100% sure, but the turret moving should also apply the moving acc penalty as well. _______________________________ Just for clarity sake. RNG: it stands for random number generator. The system takes into account whatever the values of the units involved are, throws a "dice/calculation" and dictates what the result should be. While the game has RNG elements, we as players can predict, mitigate or exploit the results of it. That's why good players will keep defeating bad players 99% of the time. Most of the time the term is used when extreme cases happen or by people who don't know how statistics work. Take for example a perfect balanced coin with no chance of falling on it's side so it's 50/50. Most people would expect to see a pretty close head-tail alternating after the other but the most likely result is that you will see long chains of (H) or (T) that will only average to 50/50 after a long amount of results. This translated to the game, means that only small arm fire engagements are closer to be predictable while indirect fire and tank combat can be a bit more wild. _______________________________ If those are your only complains about "RNG", then it's just a matter of not having enough knowledge about the game which unfortunately it's not explained well ingame. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Timing of heavy and super heavy tanks across all game modes16 Jun 2019, 21:56 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Jun 2019, 20:43 PMYeltsinDeathBrigades Guys, if you are going to add both CP and tech requrements to heavies, u will just forget about them especially in large team games. I've played like a thousand 3v3s and 4v4s just like 2v2s and 1v1s, and those 3v3 and 4v4 always were and artyllery clusterfuck from mortars at start to Katy's/LEFH at the end. There, where Tiger could face a horde of Jacksons is no place for this kind of unit, expecially when it is limited by 1. You could see a panther hordes instead, early brummbars or PIV spam like it happened regularly before this patch. There is gone like 2 or 3 days afterpatch. Of course people are starting to complain, because there is so much new things for every faction. Volks are already screaming about ostwind and pgrens, and there somewhere should be a scream from OKW facing SMG-tommies and cheap british TDs and AA. Just try to adopt before starting to complain, really. After week or two of bugfix patch, maybe after a big tournament where new meta will be shown, we could already really know what is requring a nerf or buff. This is not a new problem. Boosting a player so he can just rush a heavy is an inherent problem of 3v3+. It was done before with the KT, when the KT was strong. The fact that heavies are less used on 3v3+ is the nature of the mode, in a similar way as to how Ele/JT see play in 1v1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: No more trenches for infantry sections15 Jun 2019, 21:25 PM Bug related toward fixing ghost sandbags. It's on the soon hotfix. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Bug Report for Commander patch15 Jun 2019, 16:12 PM Only bug reports and anything related to it here. Salt over here: https://www.coh2.org/topic/91781/new-commander-update-patch-june-14th In: Lobby
Thread: I think the ranking system is broken15 Jun 2019, 13:32 PM Ranking in a determined league is based on how much points you gained from defeating your opponents. If you defeat low ELO players, you won't gain much. The guy you put a pic for, is only at 50% or lower WR. Been high ranked doesn't necessarily mean high ELO as the faction could have lower requirements as to what constitutes a high ladder position. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: What is people obsession with panthers?14 Jun 2019, 15:03 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2019, 20:04 PMKatitof Oh you know, its big, its expensive, its german, so it should automatically win against everything regardless of circumstances and whatever. Oh, and obviously, krupp stahl! I guess guinnungagap was Katitof all along! Close enough i guess. In: Lobby