Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: Kv2 is underperforming24 Dec 2019, 15:52 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Dec 2019, 10:33 AMJulianSnow He brings balance to the force. He unifies the whole forum, by having 99% of the users disagreeing with him. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Light tanks pop cap increase?24 Dec 2019, 15:19 PM Nope, doesn't achieve anything. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Kv2 is underperforming23 Dec 2019, 21:57 PM Kv series are fine. Stage office is UP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Great OKW commander balancing23 Dec 2019, 18:30 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2019, 12:38 PMT.R. Stormjäger My point is they are too cost efficient and equal kills leads to the soviet player having a better economy as a result. This efficiency needs to be slightly toned down, as stated for the past few months by almost everyone. Again, I’m not saying something new here, You should never be on equal number of kills against soviets. That means the soviet is trading far better than you. PD: unless he is spamming Guards/Shocks/Penals. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Great OKW commander balancing22 Dec 2019, 22:17 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Dec 2019, 12:11 PMSander93 That doesn't make sense. The Tiger I is a lategame unit that relies on good early and mid game performance to even arrive because it costs so much to call in. What do the early game adjustments have to do with that? It's not a crutch unit for OKW, it's a crutch unit for facing the IS-2 as it's the only reliable counter. And OKW's Tiger I is preferred over Ostheer's one because OKW with its Puma is more reliable against light vehicles. The WCS stats do seem to support this (although not definitively so of course, because of very low sample size) as Grand Offensive was picked in 66% of games against Soviets and only in 36% of games against USF. So players apparently do not feel like the Tiger I is the only option for OKW, just that it's the only good option to face the IS-2. The Tiger I is a very good unit, but not "OKW's only crutch". That is not true. Armored assault was picked once against OKW and Shock Rifle 4 times. Conversely Guard Motor (9) and Urban defense (8) were more popular picks. Defensive tactics and lend lease saw action as well. Soviets main issue was dealing with mechanized comps. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Simple Fixes: Tank Meta Issues22 Dec 2019, 20:18 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Dec 2019, 10:49 AMSander93 Because heavy tank destroyers and assault guns are only in 5 out of 71 commanders. Heavy tanks are significantly better represented at 9 (15 if we count the KV-2, Crocodile and AVRE) commanders. Furthermore, heavy TDs are problematic in 1v1s because of limited use/performance and not because of timing issues, while heavy tanks currently perform well across all gamemodes and (arguably) only timing is an issue. It's already been proven long ago that the heavy TDs would never work across all gamemodes, because they aren't versatile enough (without being OP), while there is still a lot of wiggle room left for heavies. I see no reason to give up already and condemn another 9-15 commanders to go out of meta in some gamemodes (the most popular ones at that) when there's still a good chance that some minor adjustments will make them fit in more easily. I'm not saying improve Heavy tank destroyers. I'm saying assume that heavies arriving slightly later in teamgames due to slower CP gaining is a reality and there is no need to push them so soon CP wise so that they can be become viable. Vet 0 TD should be able to deal with/slow down heavies. MAYBE vet2/3 shouldn't shut them down so easily if that's the issue. Same with the other way round, vet 2 Heavies been at equal foot with TDs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Simple Fixes: Tank Meta Issues21 Dec 2019, 21:11 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2019, 18:20 PMdistrofio IMO The real issue comes from a competitive 1v1 units mixed up with team game strategy. It has happened before in other RTS but in this particular one, people complaint more often because they want a game only for 1v1 or 4v4. Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2019, 08:43 AMSander93 Heavy tanks at 13 CPs came way too late for teamgames, where resources are inflated and CP gain is deflated. This meant that they arrived at a time when there were already 1-2 vet 2-3 TDs around per every enemy player, making them mostly unviable to use. Moving heavies back to 12 CPs may benefit 1v1s, but it would not benefit 3v3s and 4v4s. My only question is: If we can accept that super heavy tanks like JT, Ele and ISU152 are more than likely never gonna be viable outside of REALLY niche situations on 1v1, why can't the same line of thought be had regarding heavy tanks arriving slightly later on teamgames when there is a higher volume of units that could counter them. I'm sure there is plenty of shuffling discussion going around and probably a middle ground CP wise is gonna be made. I don't think that vet0 performance on TD vs heavy is problematic more so in the case once they get to vet2/vet3. Are there any plans to adjust those down and then remove vet 2 vet range on heavies (which makes AT vehicles answers to IS2 as OH kinda weak) I know there are other solutions been thought or tried (like implementing the cd on death for example) outside of straight balance changes, but i think this subjects at the moment will always become an issue to dance around if not address directly. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sega exec join Tencent & China Expansion21 Dec 2019, 20:52 PM Follow the route of the money. From 2018: 1. Fortnite, Epic Games - $2.4 billion 2. Dungeon Fighter Online, Nexon - $1.5 billion 3. League of Legends, Riot Games, Tencent - $1.4 billion 4. Pokemon GO, Niantic - $1.3 billion 5. Crossfire, Neowiz Games - $1.3 billion 6. Honour of Kings, Tencent - $1.3 billion 7. Fate/Grand Order, Aniplex - $1.2 billion 8. Candy Crush Saga, King, Activision Blizzard - $1.1 billion 9. Monster Strike, Mixi - $1.0 billion 10. Clash Royale, Supercell, Tencent - $0.9 billion 1. PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds, Bluehole - $1.028 billion 2. FIFA 18, Electronic Arts - $790 million 3. Grand Theft Auto V, Take-Two Interactive - $628 million 4. Call of Duty: Black Ops IIII, Activision Blizzard - $612 million 5. Red Dead Redemption 2, Take-Two Interactive - $516 million 6. Call of Duty: WWII, Activision Blizzard - $506 million 7. FIFA 19, Electronic Arts - $482 million 8. Monster Hunter: World, Capcom - $467 million 9. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, Ubisoft - $440 million 10. Overwatch, Activision Blizzard - $429 million Anytime you think some game takes a stupid decision that doesn't make sense in context of the title, remember who are at the top and what they are trying to mimic. In: Lobby
Thread: Vilshanka21 Dec 2019, 07:46 AM It might be stupid asking but is there now way to upload the map as a new entity? Rename it if you want. In: Automatch Maps
Thread: Soviet Lendlease rework20 Dec 2019, 21:06 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Dec 2019, 20:32 PMKatitof In a pretty hefty meat grinder. Or 1v1? I'm talking from 2s pov. It doesn't matter. I've just went to last tournament and checked on Tights channel for 2v2 games and you get 3CP around that timing. In: COH2 Gameplay