Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - General Feedback13 Apr 2021, 12:26 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2021, 11:29 AMLewka I can't tell if he was being sarcastic in his response to you or not, but I agree the Flak Halftrack for OKW is a good anti-air Also doesn't Imperial Dane not use the medical bunker as Wehrmacht because he plays German Infantry Doctrine a lot for free healing with the Grenadiere? Also I don't see why Wehrmacht doesn't need the Ostwind. I see it used often in 1v1 matches that I watch at high level play. And it is better AA than the 222 or pintle mounted mg42s It's meme based in truth. Even before that commander was introduced, he was not building medic bunker in all his games. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback12 Apr 2021, 21:23 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2021, 18:16 PMSander93 How so? You'll most likely use this ability in conjunction with a ram, which will mean the Elefant will be backing up trying to save itself and into the path of the rocket plane targeting the rear armor (and due to collision, it's more likely to get struck then), or when the Elefant is snared and it'll be too slow to (fully) dodge it anyways. And tripple PTRS was introduced to give Penals more alpha damage against lights. It hardly had anything to do with fighting tanks, let alone heavies/superheavies. They have the AT satchel for that. Ram was nerfed but that's not the point. Back in the last year, i though this nerf (pen nerf) was at some point implemented and told my AT partner to use it against the rear armor. At which he told me he was missing on several occasions and the dmg was inferior. After testing (and recognizing that pen nerf was not implemented yet) we found it was better to use it frontally (Tiger/KT/Ele) as it was more reliable dmg. Regarding PTRS, yes, i know the point was fixing their intended role which was lacking (the light vehicle phase against specific vehicles). I'm pointing out that since 2013, the only/main approach Soviet had against long range TD has always been ram + offmap. I don't think satchel nor current version of Penals PTRS provides enough pressure or motive for someone to back tech T1 in order to counter Ele/JT. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback12 Apr 2021, 18:00 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2021, 16:39 PMthedarkarmadillo snip Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2021, 17:05 PMSander93 I find that hard to believe. If you really did, you would've noticed that the changes only nerfed the IL-2 rocket strafe's damage from 80-90% health to the rear of an Elefant to 70-80% on average (though more against the front armor), and I assume you wouldn't call this "drastically nerfed". The rockets have a high amount of deflection damage. The penetration nerf only took the edge off. TBH, it's more likely you will miss rockets by trying to hit the rear than the front, as the Ele will be moving against the direction the plane comes from. Although i agree with both positions. I like either the pen nerf or the swap with the AI strafe for the AT. But with that been done i maintain my opinion that the PTRS Penal change on the last patch was just a band aid solution rather than a long lasting option against heavy TDs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are devs killing COH2 gradually with their updates?10 Apr 2021, 22:03 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2021, 20:54 PM__deleted__ bro.. I had been playing this game for 3 years regularly till the 64-bit system update arrived and started these issues. It is not about the bandwidth. And it is not irrelevant. I never face these before as I have shown in the pictures. There is also another issue newly bred by the recent updates called " reconnection bug" The 64bit version of the games has many problems. Everyone knows that. Some people more affected than others. What i'm telling you is that the 4 pictures basically gives us 0 information in regards as to what to see or change in order to fix it. Do you know what bandwidth is? If you knew then you would understand that it has 0 importance in regards to multiplayer games outside of say having lower than what? 1 mbps? For all that matters you could show me that pic and have less than 1mbps on upload. Or been choked down by QOS set up on your modem/router. Or have issues with packet loss by playing on WIFI. If you show me a trace route or at least tell us what ISP you have that might shown if there are specific issues in your region (like what happened couple of months ago with Germany). In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Are devs killing COH2 gradually with their updates?10 Apr 2021, 18:44 PM Are the screen from before friday or not? There was an update specfically to address problems with the server which were affecting mostly 4v4. The last 3 pics you post in the 1st post are irrelevant. You need to understand that you are connecting to USA east coast. Bandwidth is irrelevant compared to quality of it. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback10 Apr 2021, 18:20 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2021, 17:54 PMPip Could you go ahead and provide an estimation of the required playtime to unlock all commanders, without spending more money on microtransactions? Have you unlocked every commander strictly through playtime? If you got the game on release/WFA release you should have every commander through gameplay even if you play on and off. If you got the game through humble bundle or free, the problem is that you need to farm way too many bulletins and skins before getting coins. In regards to Ele, i expected that Fortifications was gonna be more picked but the AT strafe is just good enough to kill mobile artillery on teamgames. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF have too many abilities by default.10 Apr 2021, 17:51 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2021, 12:26 PMleithianz I don't really see a point of arguing balance with him. I haven't been here while but I do see you complaining about vs UKF alot. When stats say otherwise. In LoL Iron league(which is the worst league), Urgot has second highest WR. Does that mean Urgot is OP? No... the WR drops to the 34th if you see it in overall. UKF is just like that. If you don't know how to cunter enplacement, IS behind green cover; So you just push & push infantries into the killing field and lose because of all MP bled.... Yeah UKF might look like OP. http://www.companyofheroes.com/leaderboards#profile/steam/76561198208402860/standings lvl. 12 ~ 13 is at best Silver? league. See what others does if you have time to discuss about the balance. The problem is in your hands not on the balance. Especially when eevry others don't agree with you, and statistics(https://coh2stats.com/) says otherwise. BTW, I do heard that low tiers have hard time vs. UKF with emplacement. Just... L2P... really... You already spent 1000+ hours. Let's do better. https://www.coh2.org/news/54445/the-ladder-1v1-matchmaking Compared to SC2 ladder it would be: Lv20/15 GM Lv14 Masters Lv13/11 Dia Lv10/7 Plat Lv7/5 Gold Lv2/4 Silver Lv1 Bronze In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Creeping barrages - tips, tricks and a potential bug?10 Apr 2021, 17:38 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2021, 04:58 AMMr. Someguy Soviets were stripped of their Precision Barrage on all artillery for a reason, and this just seems like Precision Barrage with extra steps. Precision strike was an issue on mortars and B4 mostly. On Katyusha and ML it was kinda niche on it's use because you sacrificed general firepower for single barrage/shell, with the Katyusha been much better at squad wiping. Outside of sniping rocket artillery i'm curious if you can reliable 1 shot ALL AT guns + MGs with the usage of it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why no more non-linear teching10 Apr 2021, 17:24 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2021, 05:23 AMZeroZeroNi I'm sorry what. Your saying Units were made so strong that their weakness was negated. HOW TF THAT IS NOT A BALANCE PROBLEM. Like what hell do you people think balance is. Because that's the whole point of a limited tool army. The enemy either exploits your weaknesses or you can just overcome it and win. It's a more polarizing way of gameplay. If both sides have close to 50% chances of winning the game, regardless of how they achieve it, then it's balanced. What you have issues with is design/gameplay. Right after WFA released, the only 2 match ups which remained balanced were OH vs SU and USF vs OKW. With the 2nd been the most polarizing example of this design. USF would had to win in 20 mins and OKW struggling to survive till late game which would basically be an auto win. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why no more non-linear teching9 Apr 2021, 23:47 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Apr 2021, 22:34 PMZeroZeroNi But that still isn't a problem with non linear teching. It's more a problem with the balance not being good. How hard is for you to understand that THAT kind of design is not a balance problem. If you have OH vs SU at 50% WR, it would be balanced. You can't have linear teching vs non linear teching while having the strength of non linear tech units been equal to those who have access to everything. The whole point of all 3 DLC factions on release was lacking tools but compensated by having their limited options been stronger. In: COH2 Gameplay