Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.313 Mar 2020, 21:51 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2020, 21:44 PMKatitof No. Even if you move after pressing stop, it still doesn't count as movement. You can use this "mechanic" to pull off standing accuracy shots on the move with a little bit of practice and you don't really need to be any pro as I'm able to pull it off whenever I want. When you are chasing, you already have the target on sight. Maybe i was confused with rotation. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.313 Mar 2020, 21:43 PM Quick question: even if you are immobile, Doesn't turret rotation count as movement ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Super Heavy tank requirements in Winter balance preview12 Mar 2020, 20:23 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2020, 18:52 PMVipper ? ST move from 8 to 9 Avre move from 9 to 10 Actually I suggested both to be delayed by 1 CP. I somehow read it as ST from 10 to 9 and Avre from 9 to 10 In: Lobby
Thread: wishlist Last few minor changes before live patch12 Mar 2020, 18:32 PM On the last day of Winter Relic patch gave to me: 12. No more heavies with vet2 longer range 11. Manual MG/Ostwind/Insert other unit reload 10. Stug TWP to 160 dmg and vet 2 and vet 3 swapped. 9. Small token accuracy buff for PV at vet 2 (simil to other TDs) 8. Penals requiring AT nade/Molotov upgrade for upgrading PTRS/Satchel. 7. Maxim sustained fire at vet 0. Vet 1 reducing muni. 6. Flak HT +4dmg vs vehicles 5. OH bunkers cost goto 50mp. Upgrades absorbs 100mp. Reinforce bunker been made viable. 4. M5 HT dropping medkits. 3. -10 armor on T70 2. Su85/Jackson smaller vet penetration buffs 1. 120mm vet requirement adjustments. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Super Heavy tank requirements in Winter balance preview12 Mar 2020, 18:25 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2020, 17:24 PMVipper I personally consider AVRE a better vehicle even with the latest changes to the ST. In addition ST is facing 60 range TDs that can penetrate reliably. Any way, I do not consider 1 CP difference in between AVRE and ST as "double standards" from my part, since the difference already exist in the preview. I would really object for these 2 vehicles to have the same CP thou. Double standards is asking for 1 to arrive sooner and the other later. You could have said there's a discrepancy and that both of them should either arrive at 9CP or 10CP as you say now. In: Lobby
Thread: USF teching system revamp, aftermath.12 Mar 2020, 18:20 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2020, 16:21 PMVipper I am not sure why you are against moving unit into doctrines especially since "new" units have been move to stock. The USF tech changes have made the Pack and mortar overlap too much and have practically similar timing and that creates a number of issues. Currently USF has been move from having limited access to support weapons to have more stock access than they actually need. Mortar, Pack howitzer, Scott, Sherman HE, Major barrage create a situation where these unit overlap and will either be OP or forgotten. The problem of the Pack howitzer will not go away even if it is redesigned because of it's timing. It available to soon to the mortar, has a tech cost, so it will either be OP or UP. Even if one compares it to 120mm mortar it is superior while being stock and available earlier. Because i prefer giving factions more tools, not less. A whole "NEW" unit which remove the capability of Rifles to use smoke. Mortars no longer overlap with Pack Howie as much since the moment they had all (mortars) become less lethal. Complaining about Mortar/Pack Howie overlapping with Scott/He sherman is like saying that AT guns and TD overlap too much. The barrage on the major will only overlap the moment it's free. The timing on the Pack Howie is not the issue. No more than a Land Mattress or a Stuka arriving early atm. Would it be much better as a different type of unit sure. In: Lobby
Thread: Super Heavy tank requirements in Winter balance preview12 Mar 2020, 16:37 PM I see no reason to touch the ISU152 atm. Double standards between AVRE and Sturmtiger. Croc change maybe. Tiger ace change maybe. Flak HQ should be alive in order for call ins to be available. Panzer authorisation should be a one time thing (as battle phases). Alternative nerf to offset this change: -Remove LoS of building requiring a unit for it to be effective (or picking the niche commander). -Panzer authorisation bundles up the upgrade for the Flak cannon. If you have to rebuilt Flak HQ, you would have access to all units but the cannon must be re-bought for a small price (close to engineer/medic cost unlock). In: Lobby
Thread: Ditch the Sherman Dozer Attachment12 Mar 2020, 16:37 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2020, 14:37 PMLago nuuu dont leave meee share your wisdom He took the wise decision of why and who to argue with. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Artillery Flares-Early Warning12 Mar 2020, 16:33 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2020, 14:33 PMPrinceps so we are talking about counter and not to counter abilities.... So what's about the SU spynetwork. Cant counter that either? or ? by the way how can OKW counter on map arty ? if u remove all flares ... maybe build luchs and wait for vet1 ? People are fine if the flare is attached to a unit (example mortars or PF). People are not fine with 1 click button from commander slot which can't be acknowledge where they are been used nor counter/destroyed, while also providing vision for other abilities to proc. If OKW needs a way to scout to kill offmap, scout planes do the work fine. What scout planes can't do is enable artillery or planes which requires vision to do their job if there's AA in the zone. Spynetwork is minimap only information IIRC. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF teching system revamp, aftermath.12 Mar 2020, 16:10 PM Overall a no. HMG AP to vet 1: possible M20: yes to skirt upgrade locked down. No to everything else AAHT: yes. Wonder if changing what is considered rear and front, only for pathfinding commands, would do any good. LT/Cpt: no Removing units: no Reworking Pack Howie: yes Shuffling fuel cost: not convinced. See many possible issues. In: Lobby