Profile of Abdul

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 896

General Information


Thread: Opinion on new IS-2?21 Sep 2013, 15:14 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2013, 14:33 PM=][=mmortal The T-34 can deal nice damage to a p4, In our last game my t34 rounds kept bouncing off your p4 like crazy, and the zis kept missing. The problem is that aside from the su85 which is an assault gun, the soviets do not have a good AT tank while Germans have several good AT tanks. Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2013, 14:33 PM=][=mmortal The IS-2 scatter does need to be reduced. As it stands now it will 1-2 shot entire full health It's 2-3 shots because the is2 misses. If you saw the developers cast when they increased it's scatter they made a live demonstration and the is2 kept missing or shot 1 solider. It was a fail and the developer said something to the effect "well it depends how the squad is spread out". In: COH2 Balance
Thread: NKVD Disruption Tactics18 Sep 2013, 17:19 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2013, 16:56 PMundostrescuatro almost too powerful for 1v1. it is a nice conbo though. German commander Joint Operation, has the recon flight and howitzer. In: Lobby
Thread: Very few cost effective counters to upgraded Grens18 Sep 2013, 16:31 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2013, 15:55 PMThe_rEd_bEar Hit the dirt was nerfed into oblivion and is not nearly as useful anymore, I agree with cardboard tank, a decent weapon upgrade for conscript s will be good. As well as tweaking with the vet system. No not to that extent, its still useful, especially that it reduces unit movement making firing more focused. LMG with its current dps comes in the game way too early for the soviet player to have a way to counter it. Also it increases grenadiers vetting so much because of the insane dps. Those are the two main things that need to be fixed first, then maybe dps. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Very few cost effective counters to upgraded Grens18 Sep 2013, 05:56 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2013, 05:51 AMNullist LMG needs to be considered carefully against the innate advantage on Cons of Merge and Oorah before even mentioning nerfs. We don't want to simply compare LMG performance to vanilla Cons in a "vacuum", do we. how do those two things help fight the LMG upgrade? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Cons improved against grens after patch? 18 Sep 2013, 05:51 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2013, 23:27 PMGTTV Grenadiers had their damage nerfed, their accuracy slightly buffed and their rate of fire slightly buffed. This could be what you are experiencing. I've noticed Grens performance vs cons to be worse off than they were before as a result of these changes (especially if the opponent is using con bulletins). It could be that those changes on paper made no difference but in practice made some small difference because of other variables like, less reaction, inf movement, etc. Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2013, 23:27 PMGTTV Its also a lot easier for cons to use molotovs vs Grens rifle grenade. So the Gren vs con engagement is pretty annoying right now. The problem is you have to move to dodge the molotov, but as soon as you move you've lost the engagement due to lost accuracy and losing cover. Whereas for cons it's very easy to avoid rifle grenades (just stay close). Whether this is a serious balance issue remains to be seen, because there are a lot more factors impacting balance than just these two units' engagement. I think Molotov can play into the hands of a good German players because you can almost always expect them to come close, giving you the advantage if you are in a good defensive position. By the time they reach you you already softened them up and that's when you rush into the conscripts denying them the ability to throw the Molotov and finishing off the fight quickly. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Very few cost effective counters to upgraded Grens18 Sep 2013, 05:36 AM And the prize for the most useless comment goes to..... Nullist! Enjoy your brand new super duper vacuum machine!! Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2013, 03:16 AMNullist In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Very few cost effective counters to upgraded Grens18 Sep 2013, 05:35 AM The problem is that this upgrade comes so early and combined with the flawed vet system that does not take into account upgrades makes them unstoppable killing machines. I think the solution is to fix the vet system to take the upgrade into account and make them available only after t2 or t3 upgrade done. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panthers17 Sep 2013, 19:17 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2013, 18:39 PMNullist Too bad sov fanbois will spam it to death. actually if you stay away from it, I think it will progress just fine In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panthers17 Sep 2013, 19:16 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2013, 19:12 PMEkko Tek Because other than SU-85s, there is no other armour threat to them. If they had much anti-infantry capability too they'd be OP. that's for sure In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panthers17 Sep 2013, 19:15 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2013, 18:25 PMShazz - High cost (600 mp) You bring allot of valid points, but I think this is the biggest problem. I don't understand why they made this change, but I think it made the tank too expensive now. In: COH2 Balance