Profile of ☭NoobElite☭

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2013, 18:22 PMNullist

True.

I don't think at all like what he is saying.

He's just simply flat out wrong about what my position is.

I have not, and do not, support those views he falsely implies I do.

Not that any of this has a goddam thing to do with the game.
Just two lonely kids trying to get attention.

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2013, 18:08 PMEkko Tek

I am being perfectly rational and reasonable - you just don't like the truth, which is that your opinions on the topic are skewed and lack insight because you do not actually have much experience playing. And so you throw out a bunch of ad hominems. You like to theorycraft based on statistics. Statistics are good, but are not a substitute for actually playing the game. Your position (unless it has changed) is that any changes to the MG42 must be mirrored with changes to the Maxim. This is why you keep referring to "HMG" changes. Other people are trying to point out to you that they are not in any way equal. Which you would know, if you actually had experience playing rather than just harping on about 6 man "survivability". The MG42 has received nothing but buffs and the Maxim nothing but nerfs. In addition the M3 has been nerfed, Oorah has had a cost increase, and the 222 scout car has been buffed (or the MG made more than just cosmetic after its upgrade, however you want to look at it). This is the context people are viewing the MG42 specifically within - not "HMGs" (or the Maxim) on the whole.

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2013, 17:17 PMNullist

Cos people come at you with something not related to the game at all, and certainly not to constructively discussing how to improve it or how it is now.

Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2013, 16:54 PMNullist

@Stoffa:
So. You think KV8 retreat flame dmg is ok?
Nobody objective thinks that.
Maybe you haven't seen the facts?
http://www.coh2.org/topic/7638/give-me-a-reason-why-kv8-is-op/post/73079
http://youtu.be/TeKfFG7tQpE?t=40m57s specifically

Your personal accusations are completely groundless.

I want a balanced game. Everything I post is for that purpose.

Makes no difference to me if the required changes are either Sov or Ost, or both.

As far as what I've posted, I post more factual, accurate and constructive stuff towards balance in a single day than you have in your entire 80 posts here.

You can keep trying to character assassinate with your ragemode whining and false implications. Makes no difference to me. You arent anything to me. Just some random ranter with a bad attitude.

Numerous people agree with my posts, and whats more, they are more often than not, rational, reasonable, calm and objective people. Not some foaming at the mouth "HOW DARE YOU SUGGEST MY FACTION IS OP NERF YOURS IM AFRAID DEVS WILL GET WRONG IMPRESSION RAAWR" bullshit.

The purpose of these forums, from my perspective, is to rationally and objectively as possible discuss the game, in a civilised manner.

You are simply flat out wrong about me. Probably because you are one of those "emotional" readers who thinks the internet gives two flying fucks about your anger or "feels". It doesn't, and neither do I. Even if you suddenly dropped dead tomorrow, or something equally dramatic for you, I really, seriously, would not care one single whit. If its not about the game, I dont care, and I don't want to hear it.

If you want to discuss the game objectively, and with the games best interest in-mind, then I'm all for it. If you come at me as you have, its not really an option on the table.