Profile of Omega_Warrior

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2561

General Information


Thread: Pershing feedback31 Oct 2015, 16:26 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Oct 2015, 13:02 PMBananenheld seems like everybody forgetting: 1) commander is overall very, very solid (some may say stronk) 2) usf has the best early and midgame, take that into account if you want to buff pershing. just started usf 1v1 and im steamrolling my rank 600s enemys lol thats not how balancing works. An underpowered unit is a underpowered unit, it doesn't matter how well the rest of the faction is doing. Balance is done by a unit by unit basis and just because a faction is doing well doesn't exclude its underpowered units from getting buffs. The Pershing currently isn't worth it's cost and needs changes. In: Lobby
Thread: I Feel Soviets Failed Thematically.31 Oct 2015, 04:13 AM The type of gameplay you are looking for exists. It's called con spam into t-34s. The only reason it isn't commonly seen is because of restrictive manpower costs of teching to and building T-34/76s. But it's still a valid tactic. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why some historical resemblance matters31 Oct 2015, 01:44 AM This is just dawn of war, WW2 edition. The sooner you come to terms with that the better. Balance and variety will trump realism every time. And I like it that way. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rangers30 Oct 2015, 16:04 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 13:21 PMKatitof Paras have 480 hp vs small arms. Rangers have 500 effective hp vs small arms. Paras have more dps because of additional carbine as well as the ability. How did you calculate that? Rangers have 20% reduced accuracy and paras have 1 more man aka 20% more health. They should have the same effective health vs small arms with paras being more durable against explosions. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why flamethrower on Strumpios?30 Oct 2015, 05:42 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 05:22 AMKoufromMizuchi Turns out to be a trash commander. Don't waste your money guys. This is the worst commander DLC ever sold. You must be new. There's been plenty of worse ones. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing feedback30 Oct 2015, 05:41 AM If anything they are a little too expensive. Rangers are more costly then airborne, but a functionally weaker with 1 less man and no abilities. And pershing is priced like the other heavies, but isn't really as good. In: Lobby
Thread: Rangers30 Oct 2015, 04:17 AM Honestly airborne is better. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing Pop Cap - Known Issue30 Oct 2015, 03:45 AM Thanks for the heads up In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Free Trial - Commanders Purchase Issue30 Oct 2015, 03:44 AM Who cares about hiking? I want commanders! In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Relic Stream - October 2830 Oct 2015, 02:25 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 02:13 AMBanillo my hetzer needed 125 kils to reach vet 5 (inf sections were the target) the new off map was able to bring an su85 to half health while the usf cheaper offmaps were able to kill it (time on target less so then the 155mm offmap) Time on target has always been shitty. And 200 is too much for the rockets. In: COH2 Gameplay