Profile of theblitz6794

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 395

General Information

Signature

I bought vCoH on January 3rd, 2007.
Still missing the days of vCoH 1.71. It had it's issues, like paks sniping 57s, and the strafe didn't work, but overall, it was probably the most balanced time in CoH history.

OF ruined that. CoH 2 is....balanced in a nasty way. Everyone has an equal stockpile of gamebreaking bullshit. USA is full of early game BS while the OKW doesn't get its BS until late game. It's just a question of how badly you exploit the faction's shit and how quickly, after a patch, you discover the gaping holes of bullshit Relic leaves. But either way, it's all BS. The only "BS" in vCoH that was gamechanging was the fast m8 vs a bunker.

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Typical Mid level game showing how Axis as OP23 Aug 2014, 00:11 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2014, 23:58 PMTobis So that means that this was a serious thread? http://www.coh2.org/topic/22373/uncircumcising-myself Indeed good sir! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Settings won't save22 Aug 2014, 23:44 PM Have to change my commanders every time I load because they always swap back to a few days ago. Bullitens too In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Typical Mid level game showing how Axis as OP22 Aug 2014, 23:05 PM I experiment with quite a few ingame names until I get bored and make new ones In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Swap Vehicle crews with RETs22 Aug 2014, 22:58 PM Anyone try using armor doctrine with thompsons, then swapping all your crews with RETs, for 160 MP assault infantry repairers? Is it worth it? Also, how does crew veterancy affect the tank's performance, and is there a bonus to having crews instead of RETs? In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: Typical Mid level game showing how Axis as OP22 Aug 2014, 22:54 PM Before anyone says "durr you're not pro you both need to L2P the game is balanced for pros", I understand that. But this game is not made for pros. It's made for everyone who buys it. Balancing it only for pros is frankly bullshit elitism that is going to ruin the series in the long run. If the game can't be balanced for mid level players and pros, something is seriously broken in the game This is a typical mid level skill 1v1 (I am the OKW player). Notice several things throughout the game. 1. We both make mistakes 2. I organize my forces like shit 3. He pops a sherman that, in theory, should roll me over 4. Shermans just aren't effective enough and can be sufficiently soft countered by shreks 5. His m20 is effective but too effectively soft countered by my shreks In sum, while he does have the advantage early game, through soft counters, I can slow him down sufficiently to get my tech up 6. My units punish his mistakes worse than his units punish my mistakes because his units are more fragile 7. I can drop a fucking fall squad for just ammo 8. I can pop a fall squad out of a building to totally fuck his engagements over Why are we axis players bitching that allies are too strong? Or at least USF. I maxim and con spam all the time with Soviets and it's fucking bullshit there too http://www.coh2.org/replay/22870/instructive-game-on-why-okw-is-opusf-is-up In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Instructive Game on why OKW is OP/USF is UP22 Aug 2014, 22:51 PM This is a typical mid level skill 1v1 (I am the OKW player). Notice several things throughout the game. 1. We both make mistakes 2. I organize my forces like shit 3. He pops a sherman that, in theory, should roll me over 4. Shermans just aren't effective enough and can be sufficiently soft countered by shreks 5. His m20 is effective but too effectively soft countered by my shreks In sum, while he does have the advantage early game, through soft counters, I can slow him down sufficiently to get my tech up 6. My units punish his mistakes worse than his units punish my mistakes because his units are more fragile 7. I can drop a fucking fall squad for just ammo 8. I can pop a fall squad out of a building to totally fuck his engagements over Why are we axis players bitching that allies are too strong? Or at least USF. I maxim and con spam all the time with Soviets and it's fucking bullshit there too In: Replays
Thread: 2944 - CoH2 in the distant future22 Aug 2014, 21:01 PM top kek >year is 2944 >be USF player >1337 losing streak >allies aren't allowed to win >Lord Duffy secretly releases commander with Pershing >it'stime.win >Commander has 76mm Shermans and fuel increases >Do well in early game with rifle spam >unleash horde of shermans >alldead >use AWM to unleash new horde of shermans >alldead >tiger has lost 10% of it's health >unleash pershing >victory draws near as BAR hordes descend upon the last OKW truck >allies aren't allowed to win >allies aren't allowed to win >10 stukas spawn and kill all my shit >typical CoH 2 game >1338 In: Lobby
Thread: 7:45 and cannot find a 1v1 game as axis...SAD22 Aug 2014, 20:42 PM As long as the Pershing is superior to the panther and tiger (but inferior to the KT ofc), as it historically was, then yes the Pershing will fix this. A Jumbo76, equal to tiger and panther, would also go very far in fixing this. The problem of panzershreks >>>> zooks remains, however, and USF infantry < Axis late game infantry. But it will give us a chance at least until the 25 or 30 min mark In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Biggest Flaw In Coh222 Aug 2014, 18:39 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2014, 10:50 AMUberHanz Glad someone points this out... I was already thinking I'm just getting old... For an RTS-Game, unit response time is unbelievably bad on the brink of gamebreaking. Just shows how good the game is besides that, since we're still playing it. Why are we still playing it exactly? I think we all think it's better than it is because vCoH In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Kinghts of the Cross, Cougars & 'sudden Walbelberg'22 Aug 2014, 17:25 PM Isn't this vCoH/OF? In: Scrap Yard