Profile of TheDGN

Jump back to quoted post24 Jun 2013, 22:09 PMBridger

CoH has been running for 6+ years. It costs money to create and support the infrastructure for the online system, not to mention all the patches. Without an additional revenue stream there is no incentive for a company to continue supporting a game once it will no longer make them money.

CoH1 did not have a team dedicated to supporting the game after the launch. The patches that we got were the bits of time here and there that were available. CoH2 has a live team who's job will be to create new content and patch existing content. They'll be doing that more or less full time (as I understand it). That's a pretty big benefit to us (the players), the question is: will the cost be too high?

Jump back to quoted post20 Jun 2013, 20:59 PMPingPing

Maybe YOU should real the full discussion before you throw your 2 cents into how I should behave.

The poster is making a reference to COH2 being better than COH1 yet has limited/no COH experience - so I throw a rhetorical question/position at him stating that I have no idea of his game, yet what he's doing is the equivalent of me saying how much better DOW X is better than DOW Y yet I've got no experience with DOW at all besides that DOW X Beta.

IE - How can you pass an opinion when you have no valid point of reference?

Now that said - where did all the opinionated trolls suddenly appear from?

Jump back to quoted post20 Jun 2013, 15:38 PMPingPing

Put 204 hours on COH 1 and then make that comparison of which is the better experience.