Profile of TheDGN

Jump back to quoted post31 Jul 2013, 17:46 PMpqumsieh

If we moved it to T2, then you would just have the Maxim/Sniper combo become the new meta as you put it. Again, this is where a 2v2 game makes it more difficult. It is rare to see a player build both the first and second building in a 1v1, but in a 2v2 its completely possible. The end result is better unit synergy which is compounded by team work.

My suggestion, try and synergize some of your own units to beat them. A German sniper using attack move can readily counter snipe a Soviet sniper placed in a half-track. You can't give target priority to the Soviet sniper while its garrisoned, meaning it is hard for him to counter snipe you back. That said, I would do this with 2 or 3 Grenadiers acting as a meat shield.

Jump back to quoted post31 Jul 2013, 15:34 PMThumbsUp

Also, this thread looks at 2vs2 balance. IMO 2vs2 is always going to be some sort of spam fest, in 1vs1 your opponent will get heavily punished for moves like this. I'm not saying they should leave 2vs2 in the dust but team games (as far as I know) were never the major focus of balance patching in vCoh

Jump back to quoted post29 Jul 2013, 15:25 PMZ3r07

What if we could buy better winter equipment for certain units for 10-20 ammo ?

-Better boots or even snow shoes (ridiculous?) to walk faster in deeper snow.
-Better coats/hats

It would add another "strategic resource management" to the game and the real affects of the Blizzard will be:

-Reduce unit's view range
-Disable some abilities like artillery


And a maximum of 2 Blizzards in 1v1 and 3 in 2v2.