Profile of Con!

OST call-ins:
We have removed several units from call-in tech as they no longer have drastic impact on the game while the Ostheer heavy tanks have been moved to BP 3 as for their call-in reduction bonus, rather than T4 to make them more accessible.
-Command Panzer IV cost reduction now requires either T3 built OR BP 3 researched
-Tiger/Tiger Ace/Elefant cost reduction now only requires BP 3 researched
-All other call-ins decoupled from tech

NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THE CALL IN META MUST DIE!

Having units like the stug-e not covered under the 25% more cost is bad. Call-ins are picked because they are more cost effective. the reason units like the stug-e and puma aren't seen as much anymore is because of the allies call-ins outclassing them (particularly they lend-lease Shermans), you take those away and that is no longer the case. I can understand units like the mortar half-track not being under this and in general light vehicle call-ins should be exempt or have super low requirements like buildings you're going to build anyway or start the game with.

Stug-e's aren't that far out of the meta and with these changes would easily make its way back in.

With the 25% more cost players have a choice, they can still do call-ins but they will no longer be as cost-effective compared to tech. The problem right now is call-ins are almost always the better choice, you save money and often get a better unit too.

If the problem is a unit isn't that good otherwise then make changes to the unit to make it viable, but plz don't start taking vehicles likes the stug-e out of the 25% cost. Make the player have to make a decision. (Do I tech or do I spend 325mp and 94 fuel for a stug-e?) If a player needs a unit to make a comeback and can't afford 65 mp 24 fuel more then they deserve to lose, making mistakes should mean something... far too often it doesn't with call-ins...

hmm not sure about bp3 and t4 as ost being so cheap. Like why should you go t3 most of the time with t4 being so cheap, especially with the units like Puma and stug e getting unlocks to cover the gap. Used to be 45 + 50 now 10 + 40, but I guess bp2 being 20 more kinda covers that in a way. Only difference between t3 and t4 is time 60 mp and 10 fuel. I guess though that the brumbar no longer having 120 pen and the panther having no ai offset this.

Slot items
Receive accuracy penalty of -43%
This affects all slot items, including PPSH and PTRS

PPSH:
from 0.621/0.43/0.2 to 0.947646/0.65618/0.3052 (affected by a 43% accuracy penalty)

PTRS:
Guards PTRS (affected by a 43% accuracy penalty)

Veterancy
Vet0: Conscripts receive a passive -43% accuracy penalty on equiped slot items)
Vet1: Added a Received Accuracy modifier of 0.92 (new)
Vet2: Molotov range replaced with Molotov thrown speed
Vet3: Reduced Received accuracy modifier modifier from 0.6 to 0.707
Vet3: Added an accuracy modifier 1.15 (new)

So how does this work with slot weapons? the squad gets -43% received accuracy buff, but the gun (ppsh, ptrs, etc.) gets a 43% accuracy debuff? or is it something else?

Well I couldn't double BAR or M1919A6s the last time I played USF, and that was Friday I believe.

Double M1919A6's were taken out in the last big patch as where M1919A6's and bar combo's but double bar is still a thing.

Too passive overall you camped the bot a lot when the top was wide open to push. Need to rush either an m20 if going lt or a Stuart if going captain (on such a big wide map harder to use a pack howi well). Nades work great vs mgs, smoke makes them almost useless.