Profile of simpelekees

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 159

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/simpelekees


Thread: Nationscup Update!3 Nov 2014, 08:53 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2014, 07:42 AMKreatiir Will be changed to United Kingdom . Same goes for writing Fryslân wrong. Way to go racism! In: News
Thread: How to farm War Spoils2 Nov 2014, 17:58 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Oct 2014, 10:38 AMFichtenMoped For myself I don't think this is legit and the wrong way to convince Relic to change the WS-system... Just my two cents why is it not legit? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: ISU-152 Overnerfed30 Oct 2014, 13:20 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2014, 05:17 AMNinjaWJ have faith everyone. they will be changed...SOON(TM) +1 i think so too. They are supporting the game well I'd say. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-152 Overnerfed30 Oct 2014, 09:39 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2014, 09:12 AMPanzerErotica They could just make isu, ele and jagdtiger have permanent hold fire on, in a way they won´t auto attack but when manually told to, they would still track their target etc. Best of both worlds, eh? hmm. I think the main idea of the change is it won't track it's target. This way it's still easy. Anyway, as far as ISU goes, it still wasn't nerfed sufficiently. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-152 Overnerfed30 Oct 2014, 09:01 AM I loved the change. The general idea of a heavyheavyheavy tank to take some extra effort to micro was awesome. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rewind Events presents: The 2vs2 NationsCup23 Oct 2014, 13:34 PM how will you check my nationality? Im dutch living in Switzerland, my teammate is dutch and living in Germany. In: News
Thread: [2v2] NationsCup #123 Oct 2014, 13:28 PM Fryslân Boppe keesfluitman : 76561197988851583 littlebit: 76561197993572999 Map : xxx Faction : xxx Country: Netherlands In: One4One
Thread: Romeo v VonIvan9 Oct 2014, 07:45 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Oct 2014, 17:59 PMRomeo I was watching the replay after the game and someone (RedXWings) wanted me to cast it as I was watching. Soooo here's the video I guess. need more of this...I love this. In: Replays
Thread: Heavy tanks - easy use1 Oct 2014, 09:21 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Sep 2014, 09:37 AMand Heavy tanks are a no-brainer. Their main advantage, as I see it, is that they can go in, take out a tank or two, and back out with 10% hp and get repaired to full, for free. This mechanic is the main reason why the US late game is bad: they lack heavy tanks, and heavy tanks are simply too hard to counter properly. It's the same reason why team games are heavily swayed towards Axis (though Soviet does have some heavy tanks as well). Simply making heavy call-ins require tech buildings won't fix the problem. Basically, it can only be fixed with a larger overhaul of unit stats and costs. My opinion is that heavy tanks should not have such a huge HP advantage over medium tanks. They can take a huge amount of penetrating shots, and it's simply ridiculous. The main advantage of heavy tanks should be penetration/range and armor. By making heavy tanks closer to medium tanks in performance, they could be made cheaper. I think this change would be nice, as I also dislike the fact that you almost can't afford to field any other vehicles if you get a heavy tank. It makes the gameplay way too dumb. Finally, infantry soft counters such as AT guns would also become more viable in the late game. Any thoughts on this? The above could also be accompanied with adding a cost to repairs (but might not be necessary). (PS: limiting the amount of tanks you can get is a pretty stale fix and does not change the origin of why heavy tanks are frustrating to play against.) exactly my opinion. Heavy tanks should be heavy medium tanks, not the crazy heavy they are now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My Epiphany22 Sep 2014, 08:53 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2014, 00:19 AMvoltardark You did not give any example of balance changes done in 4vs4 that would that would not be balanced in 1vs1, sorry.But all the changes you see would rather not have much impact in 1vs1. Thanks would be a great start. I think he did. Also, I think first, you should back up your case. Why would balancing 4vs4 not affect balance in 1v1? What exactly does it make an equivalent to: balancing with Pros -> balancing with Noobs. Your argument goes like this: Balancing 4vs4 wont break 1vs1 Because you tune the greater before the smaller. Because always balance the maximum before the minimum. Because the complexity before the simplicity. Because there is no exception to that rule. Then your example of shrinking a picture...wtf?? I'm sorry, but before I accept your 'rule' as universal. I'd rather take both options as equals. Your argument is circular. My opinion is that all game modes: 1v1 -> 4v4 are equally vulnerable to adaptation of balance. This is where hagen his examples come in. - Nerfing axis late game heavy armor appropriate to 4v4, will probably make them unviable and underpowered in 1v1. Which will probably change the whole meta-game in favor of mid-game Medium-armor, favoring the army that has the strongest mid-game. - Paks and HMGs are indeed easier to flank in 1v1s and perhaps require a slight nerf in 4v4 to avoid campy battles and Axis advantage (due to high penetration and damage). In 1v1 this will probably make the Paks easily counterable by any light-armor, since it won't be such a threat anymore. I think his diversity of examples better suits an argument than the sketch I gave of your argument above. In: COH2 Gameplay