Profile of DietBrownie

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 308

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/dietbrownie


Thread: Poll: USA + Soviets in one team?29 Mar 2014, 18:05 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2014, 17:43 PMMajorBloodnok I have a huge problem with historical inaccuracy- immersive? pardon me! - particularly given the Relic approach to CoH2, which was committed to tell a story......which remains unfinished. The Pacific Front was a clearer way forward - or else late NW Europe campaign......or even Africa........but not this daft mix n match And as for balance(((shudders))) The reason why they won't do balance is because Japan would be such an awful and gimmicky faction. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Russians on Western Front? Really?29 Mar 2014, 17:44 PM Well, as a community, you guys need to encourage an option to allow you guys to remain in a certain front and not force you to play against a faction that takes place in another front. It will really won't separate the community since the overwhelming majority really don't care. To be honest, yes, it doesn't feel right but it really doesn't matter to me. I tend to play 1 vs 1 ones only now so it will still be immersive. I'm just worried about balance. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Poll: USA + Soviets in one team?29 Mar 2014, 17:30 PM Well just play 1 vs 1 and it will be immersive and authentic I really could care less that it is unrealistic as long it isn't in Theater of war or campaign, however, I'm concerned with the balance. It's a video game not a movie or documentary, honestly who cares. If you care that much then don't play it, no one is stopping you. I'm sure Relic will have an option to allow you guys to remain in each different front and not force you to play against a faction that takes place in another front. If you guys want to see that option implemented, then don't scream at Relic by calling them names. I think it will be good for the game and the series as a whole. It will encourage more people to play the game and we will have more active players. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Is this M3 balanced (see video)? 29 Mar 2014, 17:28 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2014, 17:19 PMFitler Try putting a penal batallion in the car, that way it will have exellent far range damage as well as a flamer when you have to get up close. Agreed, if you put in a penal, they can easily wipe out Agrens or Pios. Especially since penal rifles are great at close range with the flamethrower supporting. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is this M3 balanced (see video)? 29 Mar 2014, 17:19 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2014, 16:50 PMvolkspam cruzz, stop the bullshit already just cuz you cant play with the non-easy-mode soviets does not mean its underpowered so much its unplayable, i am not saying here you are bad or anything but you are overhiping the situation. you should really stop acting as a pussy as and start getting familiar with the new ballance Sounds like you two have a grudge. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is this M3 balanced (see video)? 29 Mar 2014, 16:23 PM I really don't find this balanced at all. Yes, he did expose his rear but the fact that 2 pioneers, a builder, can do that much damage fast and not die just shows how broken they are. Hell even a Murican Jeep would've lasted longer in that situation. Either way doesn't matter for , I only use scout cars against MGs, mortars, or snipers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Standalone America + Germany DLC29 Mar 2014, 04:55 AM I really don't care if it's realistic or not, I'm worried about balance. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Russians on Western Front? Really?29 Mar 2014, 04:30 AM I don't care for realism. I really don't. This game is already very unrealistic in many ways. Who cares if it's some what unrealistic, I'm worried that balance would be completely screwed in the future. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: L2P thread of post-patched Soviet28 Mar 2014, 03:25 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2014, 03:15 AMferrozoica All these complaints of Cons/early game units are null in my opinion... What is (and mostly always has) been the problem is that Soviets have no late game all-rounder, apart from the IS-2. In every game I play I always feel that when going T3 or T4 I am always struggling late game. T34/85's somewhat fill the roll, but nothing equivalent to the cost effective, multi-purpose P4's and Tigers Currently I have no issues with Soviet end game. I just use the guard motor coordination tactics so I use mark target a lot since it's op In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: L2P thread of post-patched Soviet28 Mar 2014, 02:38 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2014, 02:36 AMspajn I didnt mean molotov needs to hit, it just need to force grens to move so they lose dps... and you mean cons in green cover lose to grens in no cover closecombat? Like I said depends on situation. We both know that I never meant that "cons lose in green cover to grens in no cover in cqc" But that situation is rare. If it's grens in green that move to yellow, they will be fine. If the cons are in yellow cover and grens get out of cover, with my experience using grens this patch. They will eventually win but take a lot of losses In: COH2 Gameplay