Profile of Raxzero

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 55

General Information
Register Time: 12 Sep 2019, 13:35 PM
Steam: 76561198077624056


Thread: Paratroopers are way better than Rangers.7 Jan 2020, 18:30 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2020, 00:05 AMT.R. Stormjäger This is CODGUY levels of delusional. It's the pure truth and nothing else. Heavy Cavalry was the most picked commander in the WCS 2019, now go and check how many Rangers were built. But wait, I'll spare you the trouble and just say it: 2. Out of 22 picks of the Heavy Cavalry doctrine, only 2 Rangers were built. It's not so different in the ladder either. Heavy Cavalry is certainly meta and sees the most use but despite that fact, it's been a while since I saw the Rangers last time. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Paratroopers are way better than Rangers.4 Jan 2020, 16:31 PM Y'all aren't taking this seriously just because it's a codguy thread but he's right this time. Rangers are overnerfed and no longer cost/effective. They're simply not what you expect from a 350MP, 3CP doctrinal infantry that requires minimum 90 munitions. Comparing them to Paras is out of question of course, Paras are balanced with their doctrines being not-so-powerful. So, buffing them to Para-levels is a terrible idea. What I suggest is, instead of directly buffing them, give them a bit of utility like smoke/white phosphorus/sprint/moving camo etc. If they're supposed to be the versatile infantry that can choose from 3 options, giving them more utility shouldn't be a problem. I'd like to see a sprint ability but I'd prefer not to deal with sprinting triple-zook Rangers so, I suggest giving them a smoke grenade or moving camo to make them better against support weapons. This should also make the Vet1 bonus better by indirectly buffing it. Edit: Now that I think about it again, it's possible to lock Sprint ability behind the Thompson upgrade. And giving them stock camo isn't a good idea. So, Sprint or Smoke would be better. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Territory point LoS26 Dec 2019, 00:18 AM I don't think it should be removed. It adds more depth to gameplay. Trying to micro squads around the flag to not get revealed and if your opponent makes a mistake by getting their units near to the flag, it also rewards the player who watches the battlefield carefully. However, in maps like Nexus where some cap territories are so small, this might be a problem. Adding some scaling between cap territories and the LoS given by the flag is a better solution IMO. You're right about OKW flares though. I've seen some Soviet players placing flare mines but almost never seen OKW players placing flares since the last patch. IMO It isn't the micro required but more importantly, time spent on points placing flares discourages people to use them. Reducing the time required to place flares or even better, letting them place flares on neutral points while they're capping but making the flares active only when point is captured would be a good solution. Also, assuming LoS on flags got removed, what would you suggest to replace Anvil tactics' increased LoS on flags buff with? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer pioners could have inverse dps25 Dec 2019, 23:45 PM They're engineers that only cost 200MP, what did you expect? Sturmpioneers? If you really want to see a weak starting engineer unit, take a look at USF. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Good game with a lot of back and forths9 Dec 2019, 19:49 PM . In: Replays
Thread: USF med truck needs to be replaced7 Dec 2019, 11:14 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2019, 18:42 PMelchino7 Button to deploy it permanently, removing the capability to decrew. It now gains the same HP as a bunker and removes popcap. Alternative: USF base could had a little less "stupid" design and more space to put units around. This is right here. Alternatively, they can add medic upgrade to the fighting position and make Ambulance optional for people who wants risky mobile AoE healing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Terrible match with ragequit30 Nov 2019, 23:05 PM . In: Replays
Thread: UKF absent from tourney play again22 Nov 2019, 20:36 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2019, 20:02 PMWingZero I think the most frustrating part about the Brits is the lack of specialized infantry for medium/close range. Wher has PGrens and OKW has Sturmpios but Brits have to rely on a doctrine. I think Sapper could use a DPS buff for late game maybe at Vet 2? Exactly this. Adding a T2 assault unit would fix many problems about UKF: -They can be offensive without relying on static play anymore. -They can have mobile smoke if you give assault unit a smoke grenade. -And obviously, they will have assault infantry to attack points and take them. I think adding a "Royal Assault Engineer" upgrade (60 MUN) or directly a new unit (280MP) to T2 would be the best solution that can adress to many problems about UKF without adding a lot of units/abilities and changing a lot of things about UKF. Although they should be worse than Assault Sections at fighting since they're stock, giving them smoke grenade wouldn't overlap with Assault Section's white phosphorus grenade, which serves to other purposes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brits in 1v1 is a joke22 Oct 2019, 20:02 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2019, 16:44 PMdistrofio All other factions have to decide to have either early/lategame doctrinal options, if UKF just joined the club, then congratulations, officialy UKF left being a P2W faction. I'm new in the community and keep seeing this P2W UKF everywhere. Can anyone explain me how UKF is or was a P2W faction? You can get the whole game, including UKF, dirt cheap in Steam sales and if UKF is criticized for being sold seperately why OKW and USF aren't criticized for that too? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ideas Regarding Infantry Sections21 Oct 2019, 21:36 PM Good suggestions. Especially about Hammer Gammon Bombs. They're locked behind an unfavourable tech path, costs a lot, has a long fuse and has a very short range. Letting them work as a vehicle satchel can make Hammer more favourable and they won't be OP because they're locked last tier of UKF tech and still has very short range. At least, with this, they can work as something other than very expensive bunker-destroyers. I think removing their extra moving accuracy penalty while they're 4-men could work as well. With this, UKF can have offensive and defensive options at every tier. T1-Offensive 4-men Sections, Defensive 5-men sections; T2-Offensive AEC, Defensive Bofors; T3-Offensive Hammer, Defensive Anvil. It would be really appropriate for faction's theme. In: COH2 Balance