Profile of Firesparks

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1930

General Information


Thread: Hammer gammon are (still) too expensive.3 Mar 2016, 23:32 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Mar 2016, 20:07 PMMr.Smith PS: I can't really comment on the anti-infantry performance, since I can't launch my tools But no, the Gammon bomb should not become a better satchel charge. Jump back to quoted post3 Mar 2016, 14:44 PMKozokus Sorry, by mobile i was meaning non-team infantery and fast moving vehicles. I wont say it is useless as it does significant dammage (somethin' like 200 for gamon + stun and 300-350 for satchel) to vehicles. 3-4 secondes to detonate may seems a lot but i found it enough to hit a vehicle that stop his engine to aim better as he cannot escape the danger zone in time. Plus, a satchel/gammon in the face is often unexpected and catch most player by surprise, focused they are, on the positionning of your at guns. the gammon bomb have a 3.3 seconds fuse and a short throw range. People should be already watching for the regular grenade if a squad get within 20 meters of you. There's no excuse for not dodging the gammon bomb. the reason most people doesn't expect a gammon bomb is because most people don't use it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hammer gammon are (still) too expensive.3 Mar 2016, 22:59 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Mar 2016, 13:53 PMPablonano Satchel cost 60, and its locked behind an specialist unit, thats why its better than gammon bomb satchel cost 45 munition. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hammer gammon are (still) too expensive.3 Mar 2016, 13:26 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Mar 2016, 13:20 PMMr.Smith Agreed. I'm not sure if it also takes buildings down in one go post-patch too. 75mu for a throwing grenade is ridiculous to begin with. To justified the price of 75 munition, the gammon bomb would either need to be undodgeable or to be a nuke. Jump back to quoted post3 Mar 2016, 13:06 PMTNrg Use it against MGs in buildings and stuff like that, things that can't usually retreat in time. I think it pretty much oneshot wipes a building. the hammer gammon bomb have the same 3.3 second fuse time as the penal satchel. The german player would need to be caught sleeping to lose anything to the hammer gammon In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hammer gammon are (still) too expensive.3 Mar 2016, 13:17 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Mar 2016, 13:12 PMTNrg Yeah, AFAIK satchels don't even damage buildings in this patch (lelic wut??) the recent patch fixed it. Penal satchel will one shot buildings again. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hammer gammon are (still) too expensive.3 Mar 2016, 13:11 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Mar 2016, 13:06 PMTNrg Use it against MGs in buildings and stuff like that, things that can't usually retreat in time. I think it pretty much oneshot wipes a building. Gammon bomb deal heavy damage to building, but it's not a guarantee like the old satchel. The satchel also cost 45 munition compared to the gammon's 75. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Concerned about 222 price3 Mar 2016, 13:03 PM But they have Doctrinal Boys infantry section against those... Its doctrinal counter sure but OST need doctrinal counters against brit in some maps too... the BOYS at rifle are DLC on top of being doctrinal. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hammer gammon are (still) too expensive.3 Mar 2016, 12:59 PM the hammer gammon bomb should be 45 munition, not 75 munition. the short is fairly short with a ~3.0 seconds fuse. Most tanks should be able to dodge the bomb easily, unless it's got a damaged engine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pack howie vs Lieg auto attack range3 Mar 2016, 09:51 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Mar 2016, 09:27 AMBananenheld People seem to forget the trade off is a 110 range barrage for the pak howie. Pak howie= short range, big punch, long range barrage ability the barrage takes 60 seconds to recharge and only fire 3 shells. the normal mortar barrage only take 30 seconds to recharge. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brits need a heavy tank3 Mar 2016, 08:32 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Mar 2016, 08:28 AMPanzerschützen TOG II MVGame this isn't a naval RTS In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brits need a heavy tank3 Mar 2016, 06:53 AM The Firefly rivals the Panther. They're supposed to both be tank hunters. the panther have significantly better durability, speed, and mg. Firefly's advantages is the 10 meter range difference and the expensive tulip. The panther can reliably slug fight any allied tanks 1 on 1, including the pershing and is2. It's also got enough mg to harm infantry. the firefly have trouble with the panzer 4 in a straight up fight. It's a jackson with better hp but significantly worst dps and speed. The Firefly shouldn't cost 440mp 155 fuel. In: COH2 Balance