Profile of Klement Pikhtura

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 772

General Information


Thread: Pershing vs Tiger. Shouldn't Pershing be buffed?18 May 2021, 08:43 AM Jump back to quoted post18 May 2021, 08:31 AMSumi Funny right? This pershing is supposed to be a PREMIUM TANK yet here it is being wrecked by a doctrinal AT tank, my point being a panther alone is enough to lockout a pershing. There should be no comparison of Pershing with Tiger since it is no where near that beast. Congratulations the balance team has provided a Comet to USF with just increased AOE Radius, slower speed and no smokes, but still, it will take a minimum of 3 to 4 shots to wipe a full health squad. CoMBiNeD aRmS wILl hElP pErSHiNg lmao imagine brining a conditional claim to support a units performance. this is as fair an axis premium super heavy being on constant repair duty because of non doc tank destroyers. And it is not a comet, but a panther with p4 mobility that hits like IS-2. FYI it is still 6 shots kill. 800 hp is just for fast repairs. Health from 960 to 800 15% damage reduction to retain 6 shot kill but faster repair times In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Scatter This! - Your trusty scatter calculator17 May 2021, 12:43 PM Thank you, I got it! 'Simulation' tab -> choose simulation parameters -> press 'start simulation' -> open any of graphs tabs (from 1 to 4) -> press 'get data from simulator' -> open 'Comparison' tab and change table names match the content of the graph. But there is a weird issue with AOE graphs that show AOE with +.5 offset, e.g. p4 should be 1.18, but for some reason it shows 1.68, some with t34s, cromwell and Tiger. Perhaps there are issues with Serelia's AOE numbers, although last time I checked some of them they were correct. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback16 May 2021, 21:48 PM not worth. deleted In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback16 May 2021, 20:09 PM Jump back to quoted post16 May 2021, 19:58 PMVipper Do you actually think that having HE for the 75mm and HVAP for 76mm is a disadvantage of these units or are you just trolling? Your words are "M4C does not have to switch shell to fight different target. Its AP rounds is both good at AT and AI." Because if you only use AP rounds with 76mm it becomes a trash tank. There is not way you'd spend 125 fuel on that. Also I never said that switching ammo is was a disadvantage. This is how these armor works and I absolutely have no problem with that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Scatter This! - Your trusty scatter calculator16 May 2021, 19:57 PM Well done, very helpful! Now I can skip on geometry while drawing AOE But how do I use comparison tab? It only shows 4 heavy tanks (w/o KV2). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback16 May 2021, 19:45 PM Jump back to quoted post16 May 2021, 19:04 PMVipper Now try comparing the M4C AP rounds with Sherman 75mm AP rounds. Unless you also want to claim that 75mm can only fight Ostwinds. Being able to choose from AP and HAVP rounds is an option for the 76mm Sherman the same way that being able to choose from HE is an option for the 75mm Sherman. It is no away disadvantage. Do you actually believe in what you've stated or you just trolling? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback16 May 2021, 18:23 PM M4C AP: Accuracy (near/mid/far) - 0.05/0.0375/0.25. Perpetration (near/mid/far) - 140/130/120. Reload duration - 4.1 / 4.5 (live) 4.85 / 5.25 (patch) HVAP: Accuracy (near/mid/far) - 0.06/0.0425/0.035. Perpetration (near/mid/far) - 220/180/165. Reload duration - 6.1 Pretty obvious that you don't want to use AP shells vs targets heavier then Ostwind. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback16 May 2021, 18:06 PM Jump back to quoted post16 May 2021, 14:09 PMVipper M4C does not have to switch shell to fight different target. Its AP rounds is both good at AT and AI. No, it does. Check it yourself In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback16 May 2021, 10:37 AM IMO USF crew is the best, because during repairs only 1 unit is of the battlefield. Engineer could perform scouting, minesweeping, capping, laying mines or obviously repairing, cons can build sandbags, cap, fight etc or repair (with doctrinal ability), with crew you don't have to do all this. Crew also helps with micro. You don't have to wait for engi or anyone to repair the armor. Perhaps reducing actual hitpoints and adding damage reduction, like it was with KV-1, may somewhat level out M4C with 76mm, or add capping ability that t34s have. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing vs Tiger. Shouldn't Pershing be buffed?16 May 2021, 08:11 AM As fast as P4J, armor and HP similar to Panther and its AOE is second to KT's, while Tiger's AOE is pretty much the worst in its class. Its MG performance is pretty bad though + no pintle. So if you fire further then 35 range at infantry, then it is pretty great in terms of anti-infatnry performance. It smashes infantry pretty consistently and because of high acceleration and speed can retreat quite fast. I think pershing is not viable, because doctrine is not viable. Rangers are not meta, smoke barrage is good, but expensive + USF already has lots of it. Sandbags, mines and combined arms are great, but that's about it. It seems that Pershing by itself is not worth picking the commander. Jump back to quoted post16 May 2021, 06:39 AMMMX In general people seem to underestimate and underutilize the skill shot by a lot, even though it's not only useful as an AT tool but also has a huge AoE and OHK radius (1.25) paired with zero (!) scatter. That means you can use it to take out team weapons, such as AT guns, from a safe distance with often only one shot - even through most shotblockers and houses (example in the spoiler below). Wow, had no clue about it. Just tested it and it hurts like a truck. But the price kind of hurts a little, so it is far from spamable. In: COH2 Balance