Profile of Bulgakov

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 987

General Information
Steam: 76561198061121041


Thread: Allied infantry vs Axis tanks25 Jan 2017, 18:51 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Oct 2016, 18:49 PMOutsider_Sidaroth I say it's more like the Comet needs to be on Panther level. Lol? Unless you meant that it should lose its speed and AI power? Then it would equal the panther, sure. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Allied infantry vs Axis tanks25 Jan 2017, 18:49 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Oct 2016, 14:59 PMOutsider_Sidaroth I know it's really complicated but check their weapon upgrades, if they are upgraded with AI tools then you can send your Panzers, if they have AT upgrades send your Ubersoldaten. Sounds simple enough right? I wonder if you said the same thing about Volks blobs with shreks? Now Axis cannot blob AT infantry but Allies can when really it's the axis that needs the AT to handle Allied lights and mediums. And if they have a group of inf with both AT and AI? And what to do when a mattress, Katyusha, Calliope wipes your Obers? Or when their mediums rush in and crush your infantry, which is something Axis cannot do either. The tables have turned solidly in favour of allies with excellent infantry, the best light tanks and tons of indirect fire options. Axis infantry just melts, then the AT blobs come in. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.5 Update14 Jan 2017, 10:13 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2017, 01:59 AMPedro_Jedi Guys, could someone please answer if: 1) Isn't the wehr medkit going to have some price decrease? 2) Will you pretty please change the brit coded locked trench to a regular, wehr one? That shit lends itself some pretty cancerous cheesy play +1 Or make Axis trenches only available to Axis units. Also, do we really need a stronger bren carrier? T0 and T1 light vehicles have never contributed to fun gameplay. With the upgrade, the Bren will be more deadly and more impervious to light arms. GNYAKHHH! Compare the armour and HP values of allied light vehicles to the damn Kubel's and consider the balance. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.4 Update11 Jan 2017, 15:40 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2017, 15:35 PMAustralian Magic Hector already prooved that T1+T2 is a bit harsh option for SU in terms of map control and MP. Plus why do you refer to live T70 verions? WBP is no longer such wipe machine. He didn't PROVE anything. He claims it is harsh but that doesn't mean it is. Teching T2 for Zis is a very small investment. Hector thinks it's harsh because it means less penalspam. T70 takes 3 shots to kill in WBP. It's now even more superior to AC and Luchs. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.4 Update11 Jan 2017, 15:37 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2017, 14:40 PM__deleted__ You clearly don´t understand the concept. Enemy will have 30 seconds advantage resulting into better map presence and fighting positions. Ostheer early game is completely different to soviet tier1 approach. For ost, you have to build tier1 in order to get anything else than HMG - core desing, while for soviets you can go cons or get tier1. Problem is that tier1 is inefficient compared to other approaches right now. Dat hypocrisy though... For soviets, losing time is a problem. For Ostheer it's core design. "For ost, you have to build tier1 in order to get anything else than HMG - core desing" What if I told you: For Sovs, you have to build T1 in order to get anything else than Cons - Core design. Check your facts better. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.4 Update11 Jan 2017, 15:32 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2017, 11:52 AMaaa 70 fuel difference between luchs and t70. Plus fuel that luchs can deny. So much time is enogh to close the game. Thats why good early at is necessary You can go T2 and get a Zis. T2 is very cheap. But obviously you want even more Penals to put more pressure on your opponent, huh? Lastly, Luchs is nowhere near as game-changing as T-70 squad-wipe machine. Check ImperialDane, Tightrope, GG shoutcasts for similar comments. Allies have all tons of handheld AT and the best light tanks while Axis have expensive, 4-men handheld AT squads. 3x PTRS vs light tank > 1 shrek 2x Zookas vs light tank > shrek 2x Piats vs light tank > shrek In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.4 Update11 Jan 2017, 10:50 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2017, 10:35 AMmiragefla I believe T1 should only have soft AT, enough to make soft-skinned vehicles have second thoughts on charging in. I do not mind the AT satchel if it's enough to just keep vehicles from charging in and/or there's the other idea of allowing the M3 to have enough penetration to at least chip armoured cars and half-tracks from a distance. This means T1 players can have their cake and eat it too. They get mainline infantry with flamethrowers to totally deny garrison / cover use. Then they don't even need to tech up for 12 minutes because PTRS will handle anything the axis can field. They get the benefits of a strong early game and little in the way of downsides. Axis can't harrass 'cos the M3 can chase you all the way to base and wipe a squad. Axis can't use cover because of flamers Axis have to bunch up and lose map control Axis hard counters are instantly countered by the same tier. Scout car vs PTRS = PTRS win. Luchs can't do much pushing either. There should be a trade-off for the early power boost. And why the hell do all Allied infantry have good handheld AT for their mainline and elite inf when Axis lights and mediums are weaker than allied lights and mediums and the OKW had their shrek taken. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: why imo Penal are flawed by design. 9 Jan 2017, 08:18 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2017, 20:14 PMTiger Baron The only 2 instances of penal units I've seen I think are in Enemy at the Gates and Generation War, and neither were regarded as "Elite" units, better equipped than their ordinary counterparts. Enemy at the Gates was a fictional movie, not a factual documentary. Everything you saw there was made up with the exception of a few names. Do you really feel that a movie is basis for factual debate? You're like the girl who said "I watched a documentary about Titanic but they got it all wrong, they didn't even mention Rose and Jack!" In: Lobby
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.4 Update8 Jan 2017, 09:20 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2017, 05:02 AMkingdun3284 Where is ur flame nade and stuka and isg? They are all non doctrinal. As long as the soviet player picks T1 ,you dont have to face garrisoned mg. However, usf have to face garrisoned (the most op mg in game) MG42 and MG34 with only two non-doctrinal option which is mortar (being nerf into the ground while being more expensive than the ost one) and pack howitzer. Flame nade = repeated munitions cost. A squad can leave a garrison and move to another or to cover. OKW squads CANNOT do this vs flamers. ISG = very slow to hurt garrisoned units. Penal flamethrower = very fast. Stuka = 100 fuel and comes much later than penal flamethrowers. The Soviets have a great advantage from the very early game, which translates into a fuel advantage for them and a fuel lack for the OKW (slowing down your Stuka solution) Lastly: (even though you completely changed topic) "usf have to face garrisoned (the most op mg in game) MG42" Vickers is arguably the best MG in the game. Gets more range when vetted and does more damage. USF also have smoke grenades on their mainline infantry for a small fuel cost. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.4 Update8 Jan 2017, 04:36 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2017, 11:40 AMMr.Smith At close range, cover is already irrelevant. It gets ignored by all weapons at ranges 10 and below. By clumping up in cover, you are throwing yourself to the AoE. Precisely like the Tommy Grenade example. Next time a flamer Penal squad comes for you, step out of cover, chin up, and murder them as they approach. And while you're out of cover, the other 5 models in the squad (and any other nearby squad) are wrecking you. And the Penals can happily sit in cover because the OKW have no flamethrower. OKW can't clear garrisons well and with penal-flamers everywhere, they can't even USE garrisons. But it's ok because after 115 fuel they can have a Luchs and counter the T1 play. Oh, wait... In: COH2 Gameplay