Profile of WAAAGH2000

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 732

General Information


Thread: British - Lend Lease Assault - Feedback28 Apr 2019, 14:34 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2019, 13:37 PMLago Tbh I think both those abilities are valuable enough to be slots in their own right. The OKW Assault Package is different because there's not much of a performance boost over the stock upgrade path. Flamers, however, are a major upgrade for Sappers. It's already got smoke from the mortar. It was getting a bit smoke overkill. Crew repair is much more important given the commander's tendency towards lots of <100 FU vehicles. I think assault sections like IR.stg44,powerful but most time only one squad will upgrade，so it use one commander ability is waste，same as USF and UKF flamethrower upgrade，most time we traning engineer at the most two or three squads，and one of them will upgrade sweeper，so one weapon use one commander ability you don't think it waste？ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British - Lend Lease Assault - Feedback28 Apr 2019, 12:32 PM Why not bundle Assault section with Royal Engineer flamethrower like OKW assault pack？ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet General Faction Changes - New cmdr mod 5.027 Apr 2019, 23:50 PM Maybe SU76 should increase damage to 160 in vet2？ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehrmacht - Strategic Reserves - Feedback27 Apr 2019, 14:22 PM How about make Radio Bunker be passive ability bundle with bunker MG42 upgrade or all Ost bunker？ Or replace by anyother ability..... In: Lobby
Thread: Some idea for Ost new commander Radio Bunker 27 Apr 2019, 13:52 PM I dont know how balance team invented this bunker....maybe more buff or replace by something will be better... How about make Radio Bunker be passive upgrade bundle with bunker MG42 upgrade？ Or replace by anyother ability..... In: Lobby
Thread: Tie Call-Ins to tech this patch25 Apr 2019, 22:20 PM I think it better only for IS2 tiger and command panther,they are powerful in 1V1 or 2v2 because they can AI and AT Pershing is weak enough，I dont think it should request tech，if Pershning need tech，PLZ cost reduce to 200 fuel，or give more HP …… Other heavy vehicle is AI or AT only，they most time used in 3v3 or 4v4，and they do their job very well，and they still need AI or AT vehicle support them， high CP is good limit for them timing In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehrmacht - Strategic Reserves - Feedback25 Apr 2019, 13:01 PM I got idea to rework PanzerGrenadier,based on test mod traning cost reduce to 280—300,reinforcement cost reduce to 30—32 default weapon change to 4xGrenadier 98k or 4x Sturmtroopers MP40 can use 80 ammo upgrade 4xStg44 after phase 2 ，need 2 weapon slot，got 1.5 armor and got suppression fire G43 upgrade use 60ammo got 4xG43 still use 100 ammo for 2xschreck In: Lobby
Thread: Wehrmacht - Strategic Reserves - Feedback25 Apr 2019, 11:20 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Apr 2019, 09:45 AMJibberJabberJobber I think Stormtrooper G43's need a cost reduction too, considering they're competing with free super MP40's. Both have a different role ofcourse, but you can consider them to be at the same performance level in their respective role. You also only get 3 G43's compared to 4 MP40's. I most want they got 4x G43…… In: Lobby
Thread: Wehrmacht - Strategic Reserves - Feedback25 Apr 2019, 11:17 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Apr 2019, 08:36 AMTiger Baron Agreed, and as much as people didn't like the Forward Supply Station it made more sense for a reserve force type commander to have a sort of makeshift HQ on the field rather than a static bunker that needs to be built solely by Pioneers and having weak reconnaissance abilities. My opinion is that it should become the 223 upgrade for the 221 granting it the radio relay and forward retreat point similar to the OKW or replace it with the Forward Supply Station again but implement it properly this time. Whatever,any ability better than this stupid bunker In: Lobby
Thread: Wehrmacht - Strategic Reserves - Feedback25 Apr 2019, 00:23 AM WTF with radio bunker？Replace by anyother ability plz In: Lobby