6 000 and 7 000 wins with more than 70% winrate so...
Angreifen was Korean. I’m pretty sure Asiamint is the former Angreifen, though you’d have to ask AE who’s the one keeping track of Koreans. This guy’s probably some other good player with a looooot of games who liked the username and took the opportunity to claim it. |
|
This might sound like odd advice, but what really helped me before starting 1v1s was watching a bunch of GCS2 games, which game me a general idea of how 1v1 works and I kind of got a head start in my first few games. I also recommend you find some experienced friends and play with them a lot, that helped me tremendously as well when I was a noob.
Edit: I don't mean you should watch GCS2 games specifically, there’s plenty of recent footage. |
|
I love how one random Chinese guy changed his name to PanzerGrenadierAngreifen who was Korean and now everyone thinks they beat the top 5 1v1 player. |
If I had the chance to modify the pack howitzer, it would be to remove its auto fire and focus on barrages.
Because that works so well on field artillery. |
”X faction ATG” are no-fly zone for stock mediums.Every “X faction ATG” shots is penetrating “Y faction medium”.Open a room for stock mediums aganist “X faction ATG” madness.
Fixed |
Ostheer (Grenadier and Osttruppen) range: 18
OKW (Volks) range: 15
Don't forget the faust range bulletin for Ostheer Kappa |
|
Lock this necro before Ritter shows up again. |
No it isn't. If you were comparing reload of 57mm, pak40, rak43 it goes 57mm, pak, rak (fastest to slowest)
Yup, at vet 0:
M1: 2.1-2.4 sec
Pak40: 3.5-4.1 sec
Rak: 3.8-4.3 sec |
I just didn't think people would be so dense to think I'm referring to a pak, when I said the at gun bounces up to half it's shot vs enemy med. Literally only one at gun has that characteristic.
You also said the rak should be nerfed to the pak’s rate of fire, yet you didn’t even look up basic stats to see the pak having 0.3 sec faster reload. |
 I was comparing the rak to the 57mm. The rak's RoF is closer to the 57mm than it is to the pak.
It's beyond me how people think it's okay for an at gun that penetrations mediums every shot to have the almost the same insane RoF as another at gun that bounces up to half its shots against enemy mediums and now has only 5 less range and a whole lot of more survivability.
This is the post I quoted where you don’t even mention the 57mm M1. Let’s take a look at the posts you made before it:
Basically, the raketen deserves a RoF nerf to be similar to the pak. Don't get technical with me about reload time and aim time bullshit. Just make the time it takes to fire a fucking shot the same as a pak. So the powerlevel of the rak is roughly the same. 10 less pen, 5 less range, no gun shield, but 5 man crew, retreat, and camo and the price is cheaper make it roughly the same powerlevel as the other at guns.
And like I said, none of those stats matter. Can u read? I said "don't get technical with me." The only stat that matters is TIME TO KILL. Put any stock allied medium in the range of a pak and a raketen. I dare you to tell me that the pak will kill the tank faster than the rak.
Yup, you’re an idiot. If you’re gonna argue at least name the units.
And btw the Pak40 has 3.5-4.1 sec reload at vet 0 while a vet 0 raketen has a 3.8-4.3 sec reload. Even your stats are stupid. |
Greece
Tittendachs
![[PAX Sqd.] Stormjäger flag](/images/replay/ukf_flag.jpg)
[PAX Sqd.] Stormjäger
T.R. Stormjäger
Zero
Relic Entertainment
