Nah, Pak 43 |
If it ain't broke don't fix it
Guards are one of the few definitively well balanced elite infantry in this game |
Maybe it could be locked out by flamethrower/AT upgrade, or at least put behind minesweeper upgrade |
Maybe the muni cost needs to be looked at too, now.
Or you just adjust the speed a bit more to make it identical. This is a non issue that's easily resolved |
I thought we decided this a while ago. Just cause x>y does not make y completely worthless. 1v1 isn't the only mode people play. The last thing heavies, of any faction, need is more buffs. We're at the point where you insta retreat full squads before a heavy fires to avoid getting one shot. Mobility buffs just further encourage TD spam. Why try and flank w mediums, if its impossible to do so in the first place. |
While I like the stug on paper, I think it needs some tweaking to make it more viable.
Rn there is little reason to chose it over a p4 for example. Imo at the simplest, its cost should be increased by like 10 fuel, and its range should be increased by 10. Though I am sure there are better ways to tweak its cost to justify increased performance. |
It gets destroyed easily, why bother?
if its destroyed easily, then it wouldn't hurt would it? |
OP's suggestions are reasonable. Pack howie is hilarious to watch auto-fire, but also disgusting. I've seen it two shot mgs on autofire, and hit dead center on a blob forcing it to retreat. |
+1 |
Puma needs no buffs, it bullies everything in its weight class, and already has an interesting, and fair match-up w mediums as a kiting unit, and hunting unit. just lower the Jackson's armor. it functionally makes no difference for the US player. I have never heard anyone say "I choose the Jackson cause it bounces shots so often. playing US you quickly come to terms with the fact that everything 4 shots your armor. a bounced shot is a unicorn for US. |