Profile of scratchedpaintjob

Lie. brumbbar just beat up any medium tank head on.

and to anyone that will be a denier...

•  
  

  0

  VS

  Zero

  (◣╬◢) ♠ Yoker ♣

  Trolling brits

  by: zerocoh map: Faymonville Approach

  12

  -

i just watched that replay. your opponent missplayed that badly

and brummbar+gren+pak 40 were not enough to stop cromwell from killing the brummbar and it almost got away, so claiming that the brumbar beats the cromwell is even in this case pure bullshit

Pios get better at repairing with veterancy, am i right ?

yes, vet2: +20% accuracy, +62.5% repair rate
but good luck getting a pio there

i think the tiger needs a small armor buff, it having less armor (200 iirc) than a panther (230) is just ridiculous
edit: tiger 300, panther 320

other than that repair nerf for wfas

It's an ability when you move out of its AOE you opponent just lost 250 Munis. If you are stupid enough to stay in the AOE, then it's your own fault.

again, with recon run one can call it in slightly behind enemy lines, so if you retreat you will be in it for a bit

And btw, I don't see so many players using it but all of a sudden it's a problem because a COH2 "bad manners" player used it and won King of the Hill.

actually that was just bad play by the okw player

Maybe make the AOE smaller

nerfing the AoE to what the UI tells you might actually be enough to balance that ability

Yours isn't that much better

well, don't want to compare genital lengths here , but it is clearly better than his and clearly worse than yours. i will play a little bit more of 1v1 in the next days to see where i can get on my own (was ~325 with soviets after i played last game, i think i can go a bit up further)

It's not just circle vs sector. It's the actual RANGE of the circle in comparison to all the other circle based tracking abilities.

i dont know whether the actual range is bigger or not or compared to others, but yeah, making it sector based or nerfing its range is a sufficient way to nerf it, although i believe that with the pinning of inf it still would be annoying to play against

first of all thank you very much for taking the time and reviewing the game, much appreciated!

You were extremely passive in the early game, for long periods multiple units stood around.

yep, just looked at the replay again, there were quite a lot of moments where i could have pushed

This is not your fault, but after the Brits already had AT guns and a boffors he went with a late luchs. This was a complete waste of time. He should have gotten a stuka right away.

actually this is one of the two point where i believe you are wrong. the luchs was amazing later on and helped greatly on the left side

You teched to T3 and then went to T4, which you used for a panther. This is fairly wasteful since the cost to tech and build a panther was equivalent to 3 or 4 stugs or 3 PIV's.

i hoped to get out a second panther, as i feel that stugs and especially P4s dont cut it vs comets

You wasted the early game pio capping power to stand at range and dual with an infantry section in a building. There was no way you could win this battle

i tried to stall his costly unit with my not so costly unit, but yeah, bad idea

The late game arty cover was painful, but you and your ally fought under it multiple times. As soon as you see it popped pull everything out, get everybody to safety.

we tried to do just that, but my pak for example couldnt get out in time because arty cover was way back because of recon run

Multiple times you guys cleared out most of their fighting strength and got zero caps out of it. You must be able to capitalize on his losses.

yep, we have to improve on that

The right side of the map was given over to the Brits when all you needed was one flamethrower pio and a gren to push him off.

early on that may have been enough, but once the comets were there i had nothing to stop that. stugs get circled, p4s..., p5 still lose to comet,... i wasnt quite sure how to handle the left side at that point

Your MG was poor. I don't mean that as an insult only a strict evaluation.

no insult taken and yeah, i was to passive with the mg especially

The 222 was badly handled, which was a real shame since you had spotting scopes. Try to keep it alive, it doesn't need to do much since the scopes will have it paying for itself in no time. Plus it would have shot down all those planes. It was baited into a very obvious trap when trying to hit infantry at long range, which it is very ineffective at.

i think it wasnt vet 2 at that point, was it? try to get my 222s to vet 2 before i get them back, but yeah, i got baited and fell for it like a nub

Sniper play was generally good.

thnx

The arty was a good choice, but you wasted so much time trying to kill emplacements with conventional units that you traded extremely inefficiently. If you are going to use arty don't worry as much about getting rid of emplacements. They will go very soon, 8 cps is nothing.

actually i think we might have been better off with blitzkrieg, the arty was indeed nice but didnt save us the game, while smoke and stuka cas might have

Largest problem here seemed to be map control. You lacked the right side of the map almost the entire game and occasionally lost the left.

yeah, as i already wrote above, we were too passive

thnx for all the input, will discuss it with my mate!

i'm sorry but to prove a point one needs to have some kind of basis of experiences or facts to argue, but my facts are ignored or you say something like

but I can't take a random screenshot as a proof that the arty hits units outside of its circle.

im not gonna reply to you anymore, as this thread is on the verge of derailing completely, if you want to argue further with me or want a 1v1 to prove your skill, pm me