Profile of distrofio

Your ideas are bad.

well, thanks for your feedback.

If you can't take criticism, don't post on forums, make yourself a blog, post there and disable comments, so you'll have your safe space.

You dont have a lot of friends, do you?

It would not make any harder or more challenging, especially since you have not provided a singular gameplay enhancing or balance reason why it should be.

well, im starting here, right now, but you dont seem to care. Do i need to be named katitof to be heard?

Oh and since you seem to like what happened IRL, irl pfaust penetrating front or side of tank didn't disabled the engine-it disabled the tank by killing the crew.

Totally agreed, you forgot to mention that any infantry running in front of a tank should get suppressed to death.

i wouldnt want to spend a 25 muni panzerfaust snare just to get a crew shocked or a gun damaged on a T-70... that would kill ostheer...

PTRS are really bad anti tank weapons... satchel nukes are their only saving grace... id rather keep the satchel nukes over getting tread damaged

Could you take a moment a read all the sentence before spitting out BS? Its about giving POSSITIVE FEEDBACK, if you want to troll or flame then im calling a moderator...

I've said, it would make the game harder or more challenging, in favour of new strategies or tactics, since nuking a vehicle with a homing satchel nuke bomb or destroying a tank hitting its frontal armor its dumb. Also pointing out the muni cost could change. T70 are fast, but still would get either damaged, or worse shocked to get hit by a PaK. Im just asking you to be nice and stop bitching.

First of all, I understand perfectly that COH2 is meant to be an arcade strategy game, it means it hasnt to be too complicated neither "realistic".
I just wanted to share a couple of thoughs, wheter they are balanced or not, we can discuss if it is needed some tweaking. I find snares in the game somewhat misleading and very unfavourable to armor, I mean, the fact that you shoot a pzfaust through the front of a tank and it gets "engine damage" sounds pretty meh to me.
Could the game engine differentiate between back armor snares and frontal armor ones? If so, only back armor snare abilities should do engine damage, meanwhile frontal armor snare could either shock the crew, or break the main gun. This way flanking with infantry to snare a tank gets more challenging and also "more accurate" to an actual tank ambush. Making armor a bit more durable against infantry seems interesting too.

Other idea i once had is for the penal squad, and their PRTS rifles. To change their snare satchel homing bomb nuke to a tread/wheel shot. It is known for tank crews that treads are quite fragile, they are a weak point in any tank, so using their rifles to actually damage the treads is sensible. It could have longer range to compensate the lack of the big explotion of the satchel, but both abilities could be used altogheter, firs break the treads, then later blow it to smithereens. Tread shots would require an aiming animation and could potentially immobilize the targeted vehicle.

Maybe adding a snare to UKF using their PIATS, with and ambush ability like the one in vCOH or simply by hitting rear armor. Maybe reduce their range to balance their new capability to snare a tank.

Even tank shots that hit the rear armor could have an RNG cmponent that indicates to inflict engine damage.

I sincerely think OKW is UP, because it relied on strong but few units, and they had been constantly nerfed. Many units now have a little window to shine, sometimes luck is needed to succeed and sometimes an enemy mistake is needed too.
Since winrates care so much for a few people, instead of real game balance OKW is in the center of many discussions. OKW is not a very flexible faction, it only has the advantage of early dominance because everyone knows how to counter their units already.
Maybe if the faction got a rework or revamp it could solve many problems

the maxim is after all the worst MG ingame (tried and tested vs the MG34 and the vickers... maxim performs worst out of all of them) and can easily be deathlooped by 3 grenadiers with LMGs frontally... which i did just a game ago...

all mgs are meant to stop infantry blobs... its like a rock-paper-scissors game, you dont put an mg against other and pretend to win the duel... also maxims are extremely durable.
If your mg got deathlooped it means it got either flanked or assaulted, it only bothers you because you deathloop a 6 man mg, instead of the mg42 wich has only 4 man.
0HKs are tough but as someone said earlier, its a mistake to drive a light into a minefield...

mmkay lets make the teller 30 muni but visible to infantry and not placable on roads?

its apparently fine when they nerf an broken soviet mine but unacceptable when you nerf a broken axis one.... wehraboo logic...

my suggestion at least requires the wehr player to do a followup instead of doing braindead mine placement...

now thats clearly whining...