Profile of distrofio

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2358

General Information


Thread: Sherman 76 is lackluster15 Apr 2019, 00:14 AM If jacksOPns werent as good at they are, both, S76 and even E8 could be either buffed or become used more in the current revamped USF. S76 is not bad, just there are better options (but expensive) to deal with axis armor. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Discuss - PLEASE REMOVE THE CAMO15 Apr 2019, 00:07 AM Maybe we can make it even worse In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW Truck Concept15 Apr 2019, 00:03 AM @A. Soldier Thanks, i appreciate it. I would love to give it a try, to give some constructive feedback and suggestions of this game to a mod team, since I love RTS and I have played from C&C to Total wars. But CoH2 has something very special and I would love the game balance and each faction to be as much enjoyable as it can be. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Thoughts on Panzergrenadiers14 Apr 2019, 19:13 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Apr 2019, 12:41 PMSuperHansFan ... Really why I am posting what I am because I fear you guys will unleash another Jaeger situation on us. And before you know it it's going to be pgren rush and nothing else but this time they will be non doc. Speaking based on feelings its a bad idea to begin with, add on top of that the bias and voila! Complete unconstructive comment In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Discuss - PLEASE REMOVE THE CAMO14 Apr 2019, 05:49 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2019, 19:03 PMSmartie Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2019, 18:50 PMnigo +1 Tiger Ace CoH1 skin. +1 +1 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW Truck Concept14 Apr 2019, 05:45 AM I like the idea, maybe the only thing that annoys me is the fact that a fordward HQ SWS after packing up "magically" converts into a swererHQ. But its only a aestetic detail of my part. An OKM tech rework sound interesting, but the game is already so old and it demands so much investment and resources from the mod team. Id say if i can, first lets discuss about how already set up SWS are visible through FoW, a mini map hack. It makes so easy to abuse with indirect fire and a well placed ATG. With regards of SWS being able to pack up and move i really like the idea. But then surges a serious problem. Creeping advance. Lets say you succesfuly defend some part of the map, then you can freely advance a FHQ and dig up again. OKM becomes UKF in disguise and im not entirely fine with it, so to stop creeping abuses i would suggest that in order to move already set up SWS, there is an ability that says so but requires the player to specify where the new emplacement is going to be, meanwhile the SWS packs up and moves but no longer under control of the player. This way a player can make a real bad mistake into trying to creep up to the enemy base. But overall i like the idea. +1 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW Truck Concept14 Apr 2019, 05:33 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2019, 17:32 PMSeductiveCardbordBox Not a fan of the packup. A forward point is a serious investment that should be able to be removed via some focused indirect. Allowing it to offer all its strengths and then just bail if things develop is either too lenient for somebody pushed back or way too potentially dominant for a player who can truck creep their HQ up the map one zone at a time A serious investment in what department? Wasting resources? There is no real benefit in placing HQs into the battlefield. Even T3 is as easy to destroy as an bofors emplacement, an single ATG can destroy it with some time. OKM HQs are shown even through fog of war, so being able to pack up and move on them is a good idea and the only way to stop a braindead abuse, indirect fire them as much as you can. If indirect fire on the base zone is prohibited then why should we allow to abuse SWS? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Thoughts on Panzergrenadiers14 Apr 2019, 05:20 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Apr 2019, 03:45 AMSuperHansFan But people itt said pgren rush never works and grens are mandatory... Erm you can build them as your fourth unit. Considering they utterly demolish cons etc I think timing is fine https://youtu.be/8EqdhgfMXSg Because getting a 4th squad only to trash cons is super useful as OH after min 5. Yeah, sure. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About OKW , have some ideas in my BigHeaD...13 Apr 2019, 14:08 PM If you were to play early with spios and kubels, you will facestomp against UKF, since well stationed IS can reliably repel kubels and Spios. And vickers will decimate any of the little options you have. Riflemen are strong vs spios, cost efficiency wise. After that you will need either garrison clearing tools or cost effective infantry. You get none since spios are really expensive. Overpowered in the first 3 minutes, but not cost effective. If you were to build 3 squads of spios that become a nuisance after min 5, then OKM power towards midgame will diminish a lot, even if you go mechanized. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About OKW , have some ideas in my BigHeaD...13 Apr 2019, 13:57 PM OKM is more like a SU clone rather than a offensive OH. Early volks spam is the only way to excert "domination" as the faction is designed. If you suggest Spios to get buffed, get ready to receive but almost half of the forums hate. Id suggest you not to take that route, there are simply better ways and also more civil In: COH2 Balance