Profile of distrofio

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2358

General Information


Thread: Soviet - Airbourne feedback19 Apr 2019, 05:02 AM But will a soviet commander really mount a t34? Weren't they crap quality tanks? Greatly designed and fast junk tanks. Maybe a commander kv1? Or is it too much? In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet - Airbourne feedback19 Apr 2019, 04:59 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2019, 03:55 AMMrBananaGrabber. You could drop one on inf, like Battlefield 2 #Cartillery aww good ol'memories come back to me after reading this In: Lobby
Thread: Should KV1 get 'Inspire' ability?19 Apr 2019, 04:43 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2019, 23:01 PMSkysTheLimit Yeah I think a heavy tank should reliably kill a medium... And that's a medium tank counter, AKA tank destroyer! Whether you like it or not. You can call it otherwise mr semantics, I proved my point and I'm done here. Now what you just said is even worse, because not all heavies reliably kill mediums, for example sturmtiger. Or are you saying we should buff it too? Even Jagtiger can be unreliable because it gets flanked easily, did you mean to buff it too? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Poll - Buff unviable commander abilities19 Apr 2019, 04:29 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2019, 18:32 PMAarotron one idea i had for relief infantry was that it was available from either 0 or 3 cp. after it, it would be passive ability that automatically replaces any lost infantry unit with osttruppen squad, but it would cap at 3rd squad. It would therefore not encourage just trying to put your units to harms way to get results and it would allow to soften taken losses. I can see it being maybe broken, but i think that is still better than current one. This would be awesome for SU and cons In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet buffs/adjustments18 Apr 2019, 19:31 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2019, 14:16 PMullumulu https://www.twitch.tv/videos/412718944?t=01h44m57s a maxim with LOW life and only 3 models...supress fantastically several sqauds...must be a l2p issue if your maxim cant supress Dude cons were bobbed and there is negative cover with the road. Even maxims can suppress there for Gosh sake. I have to admit it was very well played tho In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should KV1 get 'Inspire' ability?18 Apr 2019, 19:21 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2019, 15:05 PMSkysTheLimit Nobody had even talked about increasing range or penetration, and yet somehow you were convinced we were turning it into a heavy TD... Learning to read lesson nr2: Replace- to take something and change it with other, maybe better or not necessarily. If kv1 becomes a Td tier tank it means SU will have even Another option to cost efficiently and reliably destroy and/or displace enemy tanks. Again Only sith and fools deal with absolutes. And please stop wasting my time with semantics In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Paratroopers changes18 Apr 2019, 19:14 PM I don't agree with changing falls, the only argument is the 'cheesy' retreating squad wipe, but you have to admit that is not easy to pull neither cheap. I proposed in the other thread a well, double the ability cost and paradrop 2 squads. Now the player will only use the ability to infiltrate and flank instead of parking falls in cloak cover since he just spent 800 Mp and is going to lose if it doesn't use them. Also, did you consider team games or 1v1s? You know team games are full of cheese and foolish plays. On top of that you know falls are not abusing the game in any way In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Doctrinal Mortar Pit18 Apr 2019, 07:08 AM Simple but really good idea. I think this is more than ever possible. If mortars were swapped, mortar emplacement could use a buff or two. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Falls should need munition to upgrade fg4218 Apr 2019, 07:03 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2019, 22:56 PMSkysTheLimit Did you see the idea vipper and I discussed? What about buffing them and making them require a munitions upgrade? I don't have a problem with their power overall, I just don't like its shock value. I feel like it's better for the squad too if they sacrifice shock value for a net overall improvement Makes falls 5 man squads but also 5 useless man squad. Also worth noting, two FG42 instead of 4 would mean the gun DPS will be buffed and basically youll get paradrop grens with 2 instead of 1 LMG that fires on the move and is effective at close range too. I would bet a leg you dont want that. Falls shock value is pretty contained, its by no means OP and maybe we should let it end there. Apart from that the only change i would like to see the ability cooldown and cost increased 60-75% but two squads paradrop instead of one. This nerf+buff discourages spamming falls, makes them harder to call and forces the player to choose very well where to use them, losing both fallschm squads could mean loosing the game In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet buffs/adjustments18 Apr 2019, 06:49 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2019, 06:04 AMRollingStone Why shouldn't it? If you overextended your veichle with no infantry support, you can at least sacrifice it and punish the opponent, or else penals/ cavrifles will simply dominate any veichle that dare to close the distance between them. More problems with fausts i see there - if you see opponent wiping out pfaust from his back, you can run over model with it, for very little damage and send them running. For grens it is extremely painfull - losing 25% of their firepower just for broken engine. I think murky wants to say that AT satchel blowed up their soldiers aswell. In: COH2 Balance