Profile of JulianSnow

Avatar Area

Offline Netherlands
Posts: 321

General Information
Register Time: 21 Sep 2018, 10:03 AM
Last Visit Time: 13 Apr 2022, 12:03 PM
Steam: 76561198029139134
Birthday: 1991-09-08
Residence:

Netherlands
Nationality:

Netherlands
Timezone: Europe/Amsterdam
Game Name: JulianSnow

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Why the British should start with Engineers21 Jul 2021, 14:07 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jul 2021, 14:00 PMPorygon How about disengage it unless you are confident instant shutting down the UC? I think the OP really appriciates your concern about my gameplay In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why the British should start with Engineers21 Jul 2021, 13:45 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jul 2021, 13:21 PMPorygon Get a Rakentenwerfer, 221 or 222? I seldom see it survive past 7 minutes mark, I don't really like using it. True, but it often hits the 10 kills mark before 7 minutes and on roads its pretty damn fast. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why the British should start with Engineers21 Jul 2021, 13:18 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jul 2021, 03:39 AMSpoof In my opinion the UC nerf after the winter patch was too severe. I rarely see it nowadays Well, every brit opponent I see opens with a UC and it is a severe pain in the ass. You may not see it that often if you only play with the allies . I main axis/OKW and often wonder why the UC is as cheap as it is. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehrmacht Grenadier Pfaust16 Jul 2021, 07:54 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jul 2021, 00:05 AMLady Xenarra Of course Allied inf have zero issues throwing such a bomb in my face strangely. Didn't want to turn this into a faction rant, but thanks for the contribution. -- Anyone from the mod-team willing to look into this? In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Weak & Incorrect Intel Bulletins14 Jul 2021, 14:57 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jul 2021, 14:46 PMyunusozgul USF See The World, They Said! - Rear Echelon Troops fire 1% more accurately and their rifles cool down 2% faster between shots. I don't see any reason to discuss why this intel bulletin is weak because it's crystal clear that the effects which this intel bulletin provides are unseeable in-game. Therefore, it must be converted into something different and better like an observable bonus on the veterancy gain ratio of Rear Echelon Troops. Have you also noted that the multiplier behind the "faster cooldown" says x 1.02 (effectively increasing the cooldown by 2% instead of decreasing). A similar thing happens with the KV1 bulletin which says "4% increased defense", while there is no string attached to it (effectively doing nothing). Intel bulletins have been discussed quit a lot, but Relic hasnt changed them in years. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehrmacht Grenadier Pfaust14 Jul 2021, 09:54 AM I had the feeling that the Pfaust from my grenadiers get cancelled quite a few times since the last update. (Enemy AEC was in range of atleast 1 model, firing circle also entirely covering the AEC yet no faust). More people experiencing this? In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: What could be done about engineer vet9 Jul 2021, 08:03 AM - just nevermind. Totally agree with Kurobane. In: Lobby
Thread: For Mother Russia - working as intended?2 Jul 2021, 13:14 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jul 2021, 13:10 PMgeneral_gawain Completely, I'm moving with right click. 'right click' doesn't say that much, but I believe we mean the same thing. Imo the sprint should cancel but they should keep moving at the regular speed (thus moving & shooting). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: For Mother Russia - working as intended?2 Jul 2021, 13:06 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Jul 2021, 00:42 AMgeneral_gawain When your sprinting troops get shot at while sprinting they stop sprinting and start to return fire. And you're not using attack-move instead of regular move? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Something should be done about the dual atgun meta30 Jun 2021, 14:33 PM Well, the AT-gun takes up pop-cap (thus manpower income) and it costs quite some manpower itself. That is the "tactical decision". In: COH2 Gameplay