Profile of Smartie

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 857 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: OKW - Grand Offensive - Feedback25 Apr 2019, 08:58 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Apr 2019, 08:54 AMKatitof I'd say that OKW Tiger will set the precedent for the rest of them. +1 @Sander: Its good that you have the price reduction in mind but i can understand why you dont touch this issue in the commander patch. You already did more than anybody thought and hoped for with the core changes to soviets and ost. In: Lobby
Thread: OKW - Grand Offensive - Feedback25 Apr 2019, 08:51 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Apr 2019, 08:48 AMKatitof They are all going to need tech soon. Treat OKW Tiger as first wave, not an exception. You are right but should the fuel cost still be the same after the changes? I mean heavies should get a light fuel price reduction (210-215) if tied to tech. In: Lobby
Thread: OKW - Grand Offensive - Feedback25 Apr 2019, 08:44 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Apr 2019, 08:15 AMSander93 But by what right should the OKW Tiger be straight up better than the Ostheer one? I dont want to complain about the unit performance but the OKW Tiger needs tech, the OST Tiger does not. If heavies are rightfully tied to tech then the price has to be adjusted too. In: Lobby
Thread: when can artillery flares and call-in panther be fixed25 Apr 2019, 06:43 AM My educated guess: Flares in Specops will be replaced by the observation bunker in the next patch. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehrmacht - Strategic Reserves - Feedback23 Apr 2019, 13:16 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2019, 13:13 PMWittmann39 So, I suggest an anti-infantry upgrade for panzer grenadiers, somehow like new panzerfusiliers. They can have either anti-tank or anti-infantry roles: Infrared StG44 upgrade: provides 2 squad members with StG44 rifles, increases squad size by 1 (need reinforce, 90 mun maybe) Vet 3 bonus: +passive healing, increases survival chance Current modifications and costs are fine, i like combined arms. StG44 maybe replaced by one LMG34 (fires on the move, like obers). I like your idea a lot- you should also post it in the official "Pgren" thread of Miragefla or in a dedicated feedback thread for the Wehr core changes. In: Lobby
Thread: USF Urban Assault -Feedback23 Apr 2019, 13:06 PM THat sounds good, man! I especially like the changes to WC51! In: Lobby
Thread: USF Urban Assault -Feedback23 Apr 2019, 12:48 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2019, 12:34 PMLago Tie all the heavies to tech, remove 33% of the content from Mechanized and Overwatch. Bam. Overwatch should lose the leFH thats for sure, Goliath should occupy 1 commander slot. Its harder to take away 1 commander ability from US Mechanized though. A good start would be to take away the AT satchel from Cav rifles and make the WC51 more expensive. In: Lobby
Thread: USF Urban Assault -Feedback23 Apr 2019, 12:18 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2019, 11:46 AMEsxile How many time have you see USF being picked up on tournament before the WC51 rush strat? Me once: Nicko using Recon which became instantly nerfed after that. I'm not particularly fan of WC51 opening strat with Cavl rush but the fact is, that's the only thing that works well vs OKW early game. I dont think that the WC51 is a big problem against OKW; its a problem against wehrmacht. Wehr players dont have counters to a kiting light vehicles and no counters against cc infantry (early game). Maybe the problem can be solved with buffs to wehr. All in all i would like to see more commander variation in high level games. Im a huge fan of this game and we have great casters but right now its really hard to get excited if you see US mech and OKW Spec ops in 95% of all games. I personally played the majority of my games with OKW but want big changes to Specops. Its so fucking strong that you really have to "convince" yourself not to chose it. But that is an other story and dont belong in this thread. In: Lobby
Thread: Wehrmacht - Strategic Reserves - Feedback23 Apr 2019, 12:06 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2019, 11:45 AMWittmann39 I agree with you that a non-doctrinal elite unit would be much better, but i don't think that decreasing the cost of the panzergrenadiers is the answer. Regardless to its cost, the new (or the modified) unit shout be able to withstand elite infantries of other factions. +1 Just wanted to point out that they have the costs of elite infantry but obviously not the same performance. Earlier arrival + new vet1 is a step in the right direction. but i think further changes are probably needed. In: Lobby
Thread: Wehrmacht - Strategic Reserves - Feedback23 Apr 2019, 11:29 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2019, 11:08 AMWittmann39 Look at the other factions... shock troops, new guard paratroops, rangers and paratroopers, new assault tommies, falls and obers... Wehrmacht needs its own elite infantry in the same level as the mentioned squads (come on... don't mention assault grenadiers! simple 5-man mp-40) A sample suggestion would be the removal of dual flamethrowers and addition of 1 flamethrower upgrade for 60 mun. Durability package can be removed and squad can get an armor of 1.5 (same as shock troops and normal panzer greandiers). Balance team can made some additional changes to make this unit more suitable. The reworked urban panzergrenadiers may be another rare strategic reserve, like Tiger Ace and add a new unit to the old-looking wehrmacht (such as what soviets got in their new commander). You say "Wehrmacht needs its own elite infantry". I agree 100% but the best way to reach this goal is to improve the standard non doctrinal pgrens and not create a new unit that can only be used in 1 doctrine. Pgrens cost 340!!!mp they are supposed to fulfill the role of "elite inf". But the unit needs further buffs thats for sure. In: Lobby