Profile of Bizrock

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 206

General Information


Thread: The COH2 Ability Guide Mark 2.015 Apr 2019, 13:59 PM "Blendkorper Grenade Blendkorper grenades will deal damage to infantry. It will disable weapons on any vehicle within the smoke, but only for as long as the vehicle remains there, unlike USF riflemen smoke." Rifleman doesn't have a smoke anymore. In: Guides
Thread: Soviet buffs/adjustments15 Apr 2019, 00:37 AM Please stay on topic. I actually don't think that Maxim needs a buff, maybe a price reduction to 240 and it's enough. And I don't think conscripts is that bad, they just need a proper vet 1 and merge the Molotov with AT nades with proper price. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet buffs/adjustments14 Apr 2019, 16:50 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Apr 2019, 16:09 PMVipper The problem with such a vet ability would be that it would contradict with ourah. My suggestion has been: Replace molotov with a frag grenade Increase AT grenade range Remove ourah Reduce size to 1 Vet ability now is "hit the ground" bonuses and penalties improve with veterancy. These changes solidify Conscripts as defensive infatry capable of holding the line. Penal cost to 200-240 now have: ourah molotov These changes solidify Penal as cheap aggressive infatry. Now there is room for Soviet "combined arms" using 2 stock infatry. Yea, Ourah fits way more in the penal Squad, but Molotov looks more like a Conscript thing, cheap infantry using "cheap" grenade. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feedback for New Commander mod 4.0 - OST core changes14 Apr 2019, 15:43 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Apr 2019, 15:37 PMJibberJabberJobber You are right, I even see conscripts get an additional +10% accuracy at vet 3, according to numeral veterancy mod. I might have to make a vet 3 chart too. Where do you get the information of those charts? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet buffs/adjustments14 Apr 2019, 15:37 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Apr 2019, 15:00 PMVipper My point here is that if you looking to fix diversity issues and not balance issues buffing units is not the answer. What is needed is combination of slight buffs slight nerfs and/or adding utility. Don't think conscripts need any "DPS" buff. Their veterancy 1 is kinda bad. I think they have bad synergy with their kit. They can build large and heavy cover but they don't have any benefits from it, even the description of Conscripts says "good in cover". I would prefer as vet 1 some kinda buff in cover. They can't win engagements in long range, but they are bad in closing in as well. The Molotov throws so Slow and has such a small range that the majority of times you will get pin or loses models before you can try to do something. You have to tech for both molotov and AT nades which will delay tech or delay more conscripts. The problem isn't the cost, but the time you have to spend teching them while with Penals you get instant Satchel and no need to tech to get AT satchel. I think its not the performance, but the quality of life. It's annoying, at least, to play a Conscript build. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: why Rangers dont have any utility skill?14 Apr 2019, 14:01 PM More abilities to make the game more complex and fun are always welcome. More abilities mean more complex which means more micro intensive which leads to more skill gap. Of course to have more abilities needs to reduce the performance for balance. In: Lobby
Thread: Discuss - PLEASE REMOVE THE CAMO13 Apr 2019, 21:19 PM NO, the camo is the relic soul, WE CAN'T REMOVE RELIC SOUL OF THE GAME In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Feedback for New Commander mod 4.0 - OST core changes13 Apr 2019, 18:22 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2019, 16:21 PMjagd wölfe Now test both vs structures and vs infantry. Then test from the first rocket/shot landed how fast a stationary tank can get away. VS Infantry Il2 damage around 20-30% of a pioneer squad health and JU-87 did 15-20% of a pioneer squad health and supress. Vs structures against a wood house (the west wood house of crossing in the woods), JU87 AT strafe did around 55-65% of damage meanwhile IL-2 rocket strafe did 10-20% It's very hard to test how fast a stationary tank can get away. but the times between the click and the first shots are: Stuka:7.13 Il-2 6:46 The nerfs or even the complaint about the Il-2 rocket strafes was all bullshit. You guys don't know how to give proper feedback. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feedback for New Commander mod 4.0 - OST core changes13 Apr 2019, 16:19 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2019, 09:19 AMjagd wölfe Comparing at strafe vs at/ai strafe. Is also slower than a rocket strafe. 110 munis. JU87 AT Strafe. Accurate, it doesn't collide to any structure, it kills a single t34 with one strafe, front and back (I tested the frontal armor too) and can damage engine of heavy tanks while doing 70%-80% of damage, more than any bomber strike. No complaints. Meanwhile. 100 munis. IL-2 rocket AT strafe. Damages 40% of a pz4 health, EVERYBODY LOSES THEIR MINDS In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feedback for New Commander mod 4.0 - OST core changes12 Apr 2019, 22:17 PM For those who were complaining about IL2 rocket strafe being too powerful https://youtu.be/LyL1IMidVhE In: COH2 Balance