Profile of Protos Angelus

wow, just sad how they ruin a rare unit

It was used in every game in 1v1. The pick rate for that commander was stupidly large.

That's rather irrelevant. The point is that Hull Down makes your tanks immobile in a game that is dominated by manoeuvre warfare. You're going to lose the initiative and you're going to be dependant on your enemy if you dig in all your tanks. Which can work well often enough if your opponents charge headstrong into your lines, but if your opponents are good they'll just go elsewhere and overrun some other part of the map or wait until they have offmaps available.

Tell me more about maneuverability on Port Of Hamburger or Redshit express or Ettelturd station or Angrymunde. Please, do share your visions on it.

If the hull down takes time to accomplish and if going out of hull down takes a couple of seconds, then it's quite fine. You get a static emplacement that will not be able to leave the hull down instantly and engage

What Commander did you pick? To be honest I always think as USF I have to ask the question "So, how did I get here?" Brumbar/ele combo and they have locked down that side? What the hell went wrong?

As the other guy said, sometimes it's best to not attack a position at all and perhaps roam to another side of the map and push. Wermacht really sucks at re-positioning so you can hopefully catch him off guard when he decides to move. The Major + Ambo allows USF to just pack up their stuff and move if the situation isn't favorable.

If you HAD to breach that for some ungodly reason(and you lack calliope/priest) I think AT gun spam would be your only bet simply because the AT guns and elephant would wreck any jacksons. Perhaps scots using barrage on key points + smoke could of helped. At that point you are never going to use armor to get in on that.

Priority number 1 is scaring the brumbar off. So if you smoked his MG's and moved up with infantry by the sounds of things he couldn't exactly stop your infantry waltz with anything other then the brumbar.

I overextended a couple of times, to help out mid. Took heavy cav for offmap smoke to deny the elefant and rangers for flanks with tommies. He was a good player. I tried to scare off the brummbar with the Jackson so my infantry could push but a miss or a bounce was something for him to count on. And he did, stayed with the brummbar long enough for him to scare off my 3 super spread out infantry and flanking rangers + a stuka from the ally and I had to retreat. It was a premade team so they always double team-ed any effort mid and top. It's fine, it's a shitty map anyway. With one building being able to lock down on top with MG and lane-y nature for stuka and heavies.

It was just a bad game. A combo of poor decision-making. Poor execution. No teamplay vs a team that knew what they were doing, coherently. Had another game on that map and even though I had to pull shit out of my hat due to the pios being first in the top building (then an MG comes), still managed to win because I had a good team. I only play randoms so I have to ask what to do when the team is not responding to pleas.