Profile of blvckdream

Spios are just right...If anything they should get a vet requirement decrease so they scale a bit better.

"Guards need adjustment"

What I think I will get: Interesting and well thought out post about why Guards are OP and how to nerf them.

What I got: Ullumulu.

FeelsBadMan

Bulling someone because you do not agreed with his opinion is wrong, undemocratical and counter productive. If someone is so wrong it should be simple to come with a logical argument to respond to his reasoning.

Yeah..and that´s why coh2 mods should take care of comments that put people down based on their ranks. I am pretty sure some time ago posts that said something like "playercard pls; ur ranks too bad; u are noob" etc got moderated. Not sure why it isn´t done anymore because it totally got out of hand.

Lets me try to explain this to you with an example: 2 players start playing the game at the same time. Player A like competition so he check what the current meta is and learn who to play it.
Player B is player who likes to play a game and have fun and like to learn things. He check the stat of units and tries using all of them.

Obviously player A manages a higher ladder position but his opinion can hardly be considered better since his knowledge of the game is limited and he has not actually tried to see what thing work and do not work and why.

Yeah. I made that point before. Very true for a lot of these wanna be pros that put people down based on their ranks on COH2.ORG.

Ironically the really good players don´t scoop that low.

That is how every game that exists is balanced: The best player provide feedback, the game is balanced. A competitive game is a game that people will play, and will make money. To have a competitive game, you need competent players to balance the game. A game designed around catering to noobs is not a good idea from a profit standpoint. If noobs want to play their own version as they wish it to be, the CoH2 mod tools are right there. Go ahead and create "blvckdream's perfect vision for coh2" mod and have fun. The rest of us who enjoy playing a game that requires skill and is competitive and is fair will continue to provide feedback on the balance patch.

Yes and the fact that this is completly wrong is proven by our Spring Balance Patch. Where "top-level 1v1 players" have their say. Result is stupid stuff like nerfing dead units even more (Sturmtiger and AVRE) or making RNG cannons like the ISU get more scatter, so it´s even more RNG. Great.

We also get very helpful stuff like replaing ML-20 with B4 in tank hunter doctrine. Which again, makes a bad doctrine even less useable.

Thanks but I´d rather see no balance changes in the future instead of this non-sense.

And by the way, you are wrong again, top-level 1v1 doesn´t get Relic/Sega any profits. The people you call "noobs", which really are 90% of the playerbase, are who buy the game/dlcs etc. So no, the game shouldnt be balanced by a handful of people to suit their own personal needs. Being good at COH2 doesn´t mean your balance opinions are good.

So when you say "the rest of us" keep in mind that this is really only 5-10% of the COH2 playerbase and doesn´t represent the community itself. Just look how many players play 1v1 compared to the larger game modes.

COH2 was not designed to be a competitive game, it´s designed to be played by people you call "noobs". This is not SC2, CS:GO, LoL, ...

So discussing balance with average players is even more useless than normal.

coh2 community in a nutshell...maybe time to enforce some rules on balance threads?

every argument just ends in "i am right because I have better ranks"... it´s funny how elitist some people are. In C0H2 of all games lol...