Profile of Kurfürst

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 144

General Information


Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread3 Jun 2018, 18:58 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jun 2018, 06:08 AMDiogenes5 222 Scout car is way overpowered now. Way too much killing power for it's cost. Lots of n00bs with poor records with other factions are spiking up by car spam. LOL. Both the 222 and the 251 are still made of wet tissue paper, which is still retarded. Good for wasting fuel. That is what they good for. OST light vehicle play is non existent for the simple reason all it offers are two sluggish vehicles that ain't very good against tanks and ain't good against infantry either, and basically, for all the fuel spent, they still melt to any blob that you come across regularly. Until these two get proper armor and can actually play a viable role of supporting squishy OST infantry, you might as well remove them. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mobile Defence doctrine3 Jun 2018, 18:52 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2018, 01:37 AMDiogenes5 I feel that mobile defense doctrine is more of a "Lose-more-slowly" kind of doctrine. Pumas scale mediocre into the late-game and Command Tank is so fuel-heavy. The ability is nice, but you give up way more relevant abilities in other tech trees and have problems countering end-game compositions (heavy tanks). THIS. Essentially its a comeback doctrine with a bit of second chance if you bugger up the early mid game, you have a bit of a chance to play delay action with the Puma and keep your bleed lower with the Command Pz. But other than that, for the amount of fuel, neither the Puma or the Command Panzer can do much apart from boosting your defenses. They are whole incapable to play offensively with them, and once real medium tanks roll out, you are effectively playing hide and seek all the time. Which might be annoying, but it does not win matches. Tying them to Tiers or BF is just silly. It was not broken for 5 years, and its broken now, huh? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SBP Change Notes22 May 2018, 07:40 AM If lava nades on volks are such an issue, why not change them back to normal Model 24 granades, but with buffed damage against units in buildings, emplacements, heavy cover etc? And maybe keep the flame granade for the Feuersturm docrtine. The original reason for their inclusion was to provide anti-garrison for OKW (and that was before lot of other anti-garrison tools that OKW has now), so a copycat molotov was given to them. I do not see why the lava granade cannot be now replaced with something that is still effective against units in buildings, but w/o area denial and dot damage… and also something that is historically more accurate. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SBP Change Notes21 May 2018, 14:11 PM … so all you have to do is drop it at the door. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stormtroopers and stealth21 May 2018, 10:33 AM Upgrade wise, I think the Storms would have a bit of more of a shock character instead of just slightly buffed very expensively trend by starting with 1 stg and 3 kar 98s. Then a possibility for an upgrade with 3 more Stg for 75 muni. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bring back two man/woman soviet snipers [poll]21 May 2018, 10:30 AM Bring the two model soviet sniper team BACK. Actually do bother to make the counters against it, instead of these lazy copycat solutions, with everything becoming the same in the end. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SBP Change Notes21 May 2018, 10:25 AM Yeah Volks flame Granade is somehow a problem, Penal satchel that is basically 90% guarateed wipe against mg in building is not. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SBP Change Notes18 May 2018, 22:20 PM So basically they reverted all the needed allied nerfs like su76 spam due to high pen and kept the Jackson where it was with a token nerf. Then nerfed the StuG, the Panther, the wehr mortar to the ground and kept the 222 back where it was a useless unit. Then buffed the usf indirect fire, just in case. Mr smokescreen and co were true to his history or so it seems. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: about grens rifle nade.14 May 2018, 11:10 AM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2018, 08:10 AMKatitof Given how modders hate literally everything and anything that can wipe squads, I wouldn't be surprised to see nades have this kind of reduction across the board or plain 60 damage in the future. No problem with that if its just their own mod and not in a community mandated balance patch. Might as well remove all nades. Right. Rifle nades have been nerfed several times and I rarely see them wipe. Like all nades (except USF nade and Penal satchels of course), they can wipe when all models are serously low on health. They can also wipe in the same conditions as SU 85s can wipe. Otherwise, not so much. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pack Howitzer9 May 2018, 15:20 PM Jump back to quoted post9 May 2018, 12:21 PMKatitof Literally NO ONE uses PACK howi ever since the mortar introduction and it was hardly a popular choice prior to that. Try installing and playing the game. Its being used by sucessfull USF players all the time. Jump back to quoted post9 May 2018, 12:21 PMKatitof What you are experiencing these wipes from? Bad dreams? The Pack Howitzer. The problem with the pack howitzer is that its has crazy accurate shells, usually the first one lands on your mortar or mg and either wipes the crew, or the next shell does before it can even pack up and relocate. To some extent, the same problem exists with the USF mortar. In practice its just insanely accurate. Otherwise I like the idea of a long range, barrage only mini howitzer. Note sure about 160 range though, unless its more of a barrage weapon than a pinpoint weapon. The USF mortar needs to be reworked though. Its badly positioned as it is. The USF never needed, or should have an OST clone mortar. It could be a quick fire, quick reposition mortar with limited range (60) and reduced damage (60) so its a smoke tool and a indirect weapon forcing relocation so it can follow closely and help out riflemen, rather than a wipe machine of support teams. In: COH2 Gameplay