Profile of MMX

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 999 | Subs: 1

General Information
Register Time: 19 Nov 2012, 15:29 PM
Last Visit Time: 25 Jun 2024, 10:28 AM


Thread: Sandbags for RETs1 Feb 2020, 06:15 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Jan 2020, 22:30 PMLago Give RETs the ability to build sandbags. Change tank traps to yellow cover. why not just leave it as it is. current implementation works fine, at least gameplay-wise, and if you really want sandbags you've got 3 more or less powerful doctrines to cater to your needs In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzerfüssilier snare range 26 Jan 2020, 12:22 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jan 2020, 10:51 AMblvckdream On top of that I think only Grenadiers should have the extra range snare because of their vulnerability against vehicles. A 6 man Füssilier squad should not have this privilege. wasn't the vet3 damage reduction put into place to remedy exactly that? other than that i agree pfusis should either lose range on their (techless) snare or lose the vet bonus. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Scott and Pak howitzer nerfs achieved nothing26 Jan 2020, 03:41 AM agree the scott could either loose its panic smoke or get its hp reduced to 320. reworking the pack howie (and probably the isg) to be barrage only is an interesting solution indeed and i'd like to test how that pans out. that would at least be better than further neutering its performance to the point it offers nothing over the t0 mortar anymore In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Visual and UI fixes for Winter patch26 Jan 2020, 03:30 AM solid stuff, as usual! hope these changes will make it into the game. keep up the good work man. In: Lobby
Thread: COH2 winter balance mod - discussion25 Jan 2020, 07:10 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Jan 2020, 16:21 PMT.R. Stormjäger Remove the all tech structures requirement and replace with 800MP/300FU price tag on all heavies this basically... i'd be against any nerfs in the performance department, some tweaks to their price tag - both fuel and mp - would make heavies much less of a no brainer In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: On map howitzers targeting base sector25 Jan 2020, 04:07 AM not sure what gamemode you are referring to, but at least for 1v1 being able to fire into the base sector is pretty much all on-maps have going for. usually they're more a bane than a boon to your army composition due to high popcap and lack of static, clumped-up targets - at least compared to 2v2 and onwards. plus, you'll most often be firing into the FOW when attacking the base sector, so scatter will be so high that you'll actually need quite a bit of luck to hit anything at all. combined with the recent nerf to barrage cooldown, i think being able to target the base sector is not really an issue. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Balance Throwback23 Jan 2020, 12:18 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jan 2020, 08:53 AMT.R. Stormjäger Learn to read? It says “favourite balance moments”, not most OP balance changes. whoa, take it easy storm... reading comprehension, especially between the lines isn't one of your strongest points either, now is it? In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Balance Throwback23 Jan 2020, 07:41 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jan 2020, 06:51 AMT.R. Stormjäger - Jackson +5 fuel oh boy was that thing OP back then. aren't we all glad that the nerf finally brought that lil' bugger back in line? In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Can I have an empty steel bunker?17 Jan 2020, 04:49 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Jan 2020, 11:01 AMblvckdream Why? Other than rank 5000 MG42 spamming Ostheer players no one wants to have stuff like concrete bunkers in the game. It's not fun at all and I am glad the current ones are not used. while i mostly agree, i think you underestimate the fact that the majority of the playerbase enjoys a rather different play style than you and i would (i.e. tower defense) and indeed wants things like near indestructibe bunkers and omnipotent emplacements, allowing them fend off endless waves of flesh and metal with minimal imput. clearly no fun to play against, but i guess you'd have to be on the receiving end playing allies at least once in a while in order to be able to relate. that being said, bunkers and other emplacements shouldn't be patched out of relevance either imho, so the slight price decrease or added utility would be a good move in my view. still, a big no to any increase in durability, be it more hp or less damage by at guns as proposed above - they're already tough enough for what they're supposed to do. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 82mm vs 120mm Mortar against Flak HQ15 Jan 2020, 06:10 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2020, 10:37 AMKatitof I'd rather focus on the OP tests as they have actually have some data to them outside screaming X is better then Y without anything else. fair enough Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2020, 19:15 PMelchino7 -Cost should go down to 310mp and 8 popcap. this seems fair for a mortar that has a non-doc equivalent and seems to perform only marginally better, if at all. normalizing the aoe profile between barrage and autofire would be a good move, too. In: COH2 Gameplay