Profile of ullumulu

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2243

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/ullumulu


Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient28 Feb 2018, 07:05 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2018, 01:54 AMFiresparks and you get make the same argument about anything against anything. Even the t70 will kill a lone king tiger in a vacuum. flank protection is one of the most fundamental part of gameplay. i bet 10 bugs (again) that you only win vs a totally micro noob with t70 vs KT.. a noob who dont know that he can move the chassie from the KT and only turn the turrent.... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KotH faction winrates (up to S2E9)28 Feb 2018, 07:01 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2018, 23:20 PMblvckdream I dont know what to make of this post. Are you trying to say the M36 is op? Or are you saying it´s not? yes Jackson is (too) strong. 2 from it deniy every axis armor easily because of selfspoting, fast and mobile turrented design. its is the strongest nondoc TD ingame. while the usf squads with upgreades one of the strongest too....so OKW lack of AT and AI. it means you have trouble to deal with infantery AND armor because it will both deniyed by the USF units with no big problems. if you looked the KotH series in twitch...everybody complains about the jackson OPness when it was showed...and the weakness from OKW units actually. This is the reality...and not a ullumulu meme In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF/Brits suggestion.27 Feb 2018, 14:42 PM My first post was: "Brits are in ok status. problem is the super sov meta right now, which let the most players choose this faction insteed the brits. Brits was in a boring status because mostly all units overperfomed and there was no fun because you had overall a big advantage against the enemy...which make it boring over long time." There is no trolling etc. It was a conclusion from point of view. It was the actually gamestatus...everybody play sov because of super strongness actually. THis is not a lie etc... And that i never played brits very much ...i told you why. No trolling etc. You was the first who flamed my playercard... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient27 Feb 2018, 14:38 PM OKW has not one single good non-verhicle handheld AT unit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF/Brits suggestion.27 Feb 2018, 13:47 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2018, 13:33 PMTiger Baron LOL, the guy with nothing than a thousand OKW games flames my suggestion for an Army he hasn't probably ever played with even. Hmm...but in this case i have more games played than you...you have 0 ..i have nearly 100. I told you thats brits was unfunny for me. Why should i play them? they are boring and was to easy. I like challenges ----not easy chessy sim city and win In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: UKF/Brits suggestion.27 Feb 2018, 12:27 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2018, 12:23 PMTiger Baron Thank you for your insight on the design problems of the British from your long time accumulated experience from playing the OKW. It's really helpful. my nearly 100 games showed my one thing: they was overperformed, thats why they was nerfed hard. in the patches. this overperforming is in my eyes boring. I dont want a tank which shredds alle unit in 1-2 sec. i dont want a bofors which deal with whole armys. i dont want a super troops which can shredd all enemy unit in sec. and so on... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: UKF/Brits suggestion.27 Feb 2018, 12:20 PM Brits are in ok status. problem is the super sov meta right now, which let the most players choose this faction insteed the brits. Brits was in a boring status because mostly all units overperfomed and there was no fun because you had overall a big advantage against the enemy...which make it boring over long time. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient27 Feb 2018, 10:30 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2018, 10:06 AMEsxile As a matter of fact, OKW is the factions with the most numerous dedicated AT options in the game, from Pzfaust to Jtiger and this not counting the KT or SturmTiger which counter pretty much everything with disregard of being on foot or on wheel. you dont get the subject, right? we talk about lack of handheld at for okw. every verhicles is countert easily by AT guns. so okw need a NON-VERHICLE AT option. REMINDER: so lets fight 10 matches you get only jpz4 and i get only a jackson. and than we see who big the impact of skill will set to the fight. I think this is how it's gonna go down... you'll see the enemy jackson, and you'll be able to fire 1-2 shots before it's my turn and flank you. i bet 10 bugs In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient27 Feb 2018, 09:58 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2018, 09:51 AMLiberalPerturabo >Topic about the fact that OKW lacks proper AT and that's a real balance issue >Instant reply that you can build a TD in T4 so it's somehow fine (lolwut?) >jp4 is really lackluster and it doesn't even adress the topic's point. Also jackson is a thing >lol just cover jp's flanks, it's ez pz if ur good >The whole topic is literally about how OKW's non-vehicle based AT sucks therefore you can't cover anything properly Welp, looks like the circle of braindead fanboyism is finally complete. Shall we start again then? yeah..we say that okw need better non-verhicle AT. > we get the argue that jpz4 is fine (WTF!) > we get thats the OKW faction design (WTF)!! Reminder: volks with schreck was the intend faction design! > and we get to this absolut dumb argue: to have a good AT you need the jpz4! but you must save it with at gun at the flank, to be good! WTF is wrong in this people heads? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British infantry sections27 Feb 2018, 09:36 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2018, 09:26 AMVipper A full tech grenadier with heal costs: 80/0/10(T1)+240 (Grenadier)+100/40 (BP1)+0/60/0 (LMG)+150/60/0 (Bunker) = 570/120/50 so no for the same price you can not get what you describe. and now we see USF has the cheapest infantery^^ In: COH2 Balance