as i said... in that case youre playing SOV already... which is the worst faction ingame...
For me, as main Ostheer player, USA is worst fraction.  |
now i would ask you...
since you think the maxim is soo powerful would you agree for OST to have the maxim instead of the MG42? if no why? and if yes then i advise you try out the maxim for yourself...
Give me a 6men squad, molotovs and middle-range guns for Pios, yes, then I would use it.
Every franction gets tools fit for the design, soviets doesn't need an early strong supression platform. |
again do you play the soviets?
soo if you think the maxim is soo useful would you agree to exchange machineguns and give the maxim to OST? i would like to hear your complaints then...
I normally play Ostheer, but I win versus my team-mates in 1vs1, because they are so stupid easy, if you don't run into a MG.
Edit: Give me 6men suqad-members and molotov, Pios with middle-range guns. Yes, then I would use it before HMG42. |
a normal HMG with okay DPS and the worst suppression ingame with one of the worst ARCs ingame... how is this unit not underpowered to you?
they cant... the soviets are widely considered the weakest faction in the game because they cant hold the line at all till the T-70... furthermore objective evidence can be found by noting that the soviets have the lowest winrate in the game...
I get problems as soviet, if my enemy is simply better than me, better micro etc., also German late-game can be extreme powerful.
But Maxim? Never had problems with it. Maxim and some flamer pios with Cons with early Zis, and the game is yours. If you can suppress HMG42 it becomes useless, that's it weakpoint. Also cons become better than Grens over the game.
For me US is way weaker than Soviets. |
do you even play the soviets?... if youre having problems fighting the maxim then its entirely your fault
ok... who the fck gets machineguns for DPS? also maxims have a similar DPS curve to the MG42... its difference is soo minor it doesnt warrant jack shit...
Maxim, since game release, had more constant DPS than other MGs. It was designed as assault-mg, now it becämes more or less a normal HMG.
Soviets have worse suppresion because they can hold line with normal line infantry and got 7men upgrade to make it more clear. |
do you even play the soviets?... if youre having problems fighting the maxim then its entirely your fault
ok... who the fck gets machineguns for DPS? also maxims have a similar DPS curve to the MG42... its difference is soo minor it doesnt warrant jack shit...
Maxim, since game release, had more constant DPS than other MGs. It was designed as assault-mg, now it becomes more or less a normal HMG.
Soviets have worse suppresion because they can hold line with normal line infantry. |
|
Maxim is an extreme powerful MG, can't understand the crying. Maybe you use it the wrong way?
Also, as soviet you can hold line like Ostheer's Osttruppen, spam the map. Or, build multible Maxims, yes, less supression but more mobile and HP, also it is more or less immune to suppression. |
|
Lock off shouldn't disable refresh on heal-base, maybe a debuff of 50% etc. |
A brace-ability for OKW bases would be nice
Lock off shouldn't disable refresh on heal-base, maybe a debuff of 50% etc. would fit better. |
180 armor seems enough, and in general I doubt you can balance effectively a non-heavy tank with armor. A smaller hit-box could be good but rely more on RNG than actual player micro, that's why I prefer acc/decc buff which reward micro more than luck
yea, that is true. But I think, Hetzer is a good unit.
I think is would be more important to nerf other flamers DPS a bit, before touching Hetzer. KV8 and Croc are kind of extreme in comparison.
|
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
