Profile of William Christensen

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 401

General Information
Game Name: ★★ §Royal Weapon§ ★★


Thread: Grenadier 4-man Squad: A thing of the past. 13 Sep 2016, 06:29 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2016, 04:34 AMOutsider_Sidaroth RIP 1919s, nobody would pick them over 2 BARs anymore, and now Brits will be trying to steal a MG42 from Grens than buy their Brens... you gotta compensate those weapons if you want to make them single slot purchases! Do Bar counts as LMG in game? Also, LMG 42 is strong but it's use by a 4-man squad. On the other hand, Bren and M1919 are used by 5-man squads with better RA (Rifleman and upgraded Tommy) so they should be consider weaker to compensate for the squad's better survivability. I think that would work, but again, nothing is solid when it comes to CoH2 Balance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Grenadier 4-man Squad: A thing of the past. 13 Sep 2016, 02:35 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2016, 01:23 AMTobis Squad spread mirrored to tommies, LMGs limit to 1, there, infantry engagements fixed and balanced without crippling any faction in the process with silly suggestions that don't have a chance to appear outside of mods. Man, I thought Katiof took your account for a second there... Anyways, even though i'm very much like the idea of a 5th-man for the Grenadiers, I think it would be quite a big change. I mean, since the past till now, how many big changes that created more problems than its suppose to fix? Like all of them? Taking big changes ‎by far haven't bought many good things at the end of the day, so I think it's high time to stop that and start looking for another way to fix stuffs. Also, while we are at it, I think indirect-fire weaponry should get a look at, too. I mean, one of the reason Grenadiers, in particurlar, and Axis, in general, feel so weak at the moment is due to a more powerful Allies indirect-fire weapons. They have way more options non-doctrinally and many of them just way too good compared to the Axis counterparts. I think they need a look at, maybe some small tweaking from time to time, perhap (Fix this, nerf that, buff there, whatever, just check the problems out as a whole before making changes)‎ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [2v2] Advance Cancer Regiment12 Sep 2016, 10:38 AM 0 VS ★★ §Royal Weapon§ ★★ Fuckingshit BT Ultra Typical Cancerous Brit player by: William Christensen map: Crossing in the Woods 1 - So yes, I know I failed to stop the brits player from building his SimCity which covered the entire right side of the map. But what can I did back then!? I tried my best to push him but most of my army had to return to base to recover, which gave the Brit's ground to set up his double Vickers and negate any potential counter-attack made by me. I don't have smoke to aid my attack, and when his first mortar pit up, I did destroy it, but by the time it downed, his Bofor already up and basically took control the entire half. After that it's a downfall. So my question is: What could I have done differently? Did my early push a success or a complete waste of time and manpower? I appreciated all helps EDIT: By the way, I'm RoyalWeapon (OKW) in the replay In: Replay Reviews
Thread: Typical Cancerous Brit player12 Sep 2016, 10:30 AM Creating the Advance ''Cancer'' Regiment is one of the worst decisions made by Relic... In: Replays
Thread: Why schreck still cost 90 ammo?2 Sep 2016, 15:41 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Sep 2016, 14:32 PMZyllen But was the role of the volks then? I made a suggestion not much of a while back that had the same idea of moving Obers to Medic HQ and made them being able to equip double Schrecks: https://www.coh2.org/topic/55881/idea-okw-the-second-ostheer However, at the same time, I also suggested giving Volks a long-range AI weapon (for example: LMG 42) so they are more like a excel-at-long-range mainline infantry (quite similar to Ost's Grenadier) while Sturmpioneer being the CQC unit when you need.‎ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW Panzerbüchse 39 (anti tank rifle)30 Aug 2016, 15:49 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2016, 14:35 PMRappy No! Never! Obers are EXPENSIVE and four man. No one will want to give them two schreks unless it also comes with two lmgs and sort out squad spacing. They cost 100mp to reinforce one member. Basically it's a stupid idea that will never gain traction. They by far having the smallest squad size compared to other infantry at vet 0 (only 0.7) so that's kinda compensate for their high cost. We can make Ober slightly cheaper (like 350 - 375 MP) and probably slightly cheaper reinfore as well.‎ With the changes, they can now act as Elite AI infantry at long-range earlier on (While its equivalent being Panzergrenadier works best at medium to close-range) and a mobile AT unit later on with double Schrecks upgrade. You don't have to put the Schrecks on immediately, you can keep them like people did with Panzergrenadiers. But by doing this, people that open with Medic HQ would have quite a diverse army and 1 of them being mobile AT if you want. However, before this change can work or to be looked at more carefully, the Raketenwerfer needs to be fix first. Its aim time is just annoying sometimes.‎ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW Panzerbüchse 39 (anti tank rifle)29 Aug 2016, 13:24 PM I prefer the idea of moving Ober to Tier 2 (Medic HQ) then allow them to upgrade with double Schrecks. That way, OKW can open with Tier 2 without being too risky when it comes to deal with LVs rush. Or the idea of double Panzerbusches upgrade for Volks would be nice, but then it will be the whole new Panzerbusche blob thing which frankly, I think it will be a thing since Volks scale to late game better than Cons.‎ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to deal with double OKW as Brit27 Aug 2016, 02:02 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Aug 2016, 16:18 PMAsteroth Need to know this things. I only played brits so i don't know the enemies tech upgrades. I know i have to learn it, but i prefer to get a sense of playing ingame, timings and such, then these things. Anyways it's a good tip. Well then you really should know how the enemy tech and what he has when he tech like that. Not knowing what the enemy is going to have is gonna be your downfall. At least check what the enemy have in all tech structures (Create a custom game as the faction you want to know, for example). Check the meta like nowadays how would an OKW or Ost player tech up, learn the signal that gonna reveal his teching plan and prepare yourself (This page and the people up here know and discuss a lot about the meta and such, you just have to search for the posts that have them). Some players might seems to not enjoy taking stats into account while wanting to rely on ingame experience, which is not really a good idea. Of course, you don't have to be a nerd about all of those stats and such, but at least try to know which unit is stronger than that unit and stronger at what situation or weaker at what situation, etc. (Try this page: ‎http://stat.coh2.hu/ or just ask people around or you can figure it out by yourself through training) Jump back to quoted post26 Aug 2016, 16:18 PMAsteroth Not commandos, the officers thingy, that also comes in a plane and makes commandos. I freking love commandos. That is the Airlanding Officer. That squad has 1 less model than the normal Commandos squad but he give good utility (The Officer Charge is very good when you need to assault a position). Usually, just give this squad 2 Brens since he can fire them on the move. The Commandos can do the same thing but since the Commandos can stealth so you have the option to choose either fire-power with duel Brens or stealth, flanking squad with high close-range DPS (Again, it's up to you to learn and decide when to do so)‎ In: UKF Strategies
Thread: Can we have more strategy guides for Brits and OKW?26 Aug 2016, 16:09 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Aug 2016, 15:48 PMMr.Smith However, the question is: what kind of a late-game topics should faction guides cover? I think early-to-mid-game guides for Ost, UKF and OKW are always welcome though. I understand your point about the late-game since I mean at least people can just get the Panther as Ost and OKW while Comet as Brits. But that is mainly how most non-professional players go and I think some of them actually want to try out other combinations that the pros have been doing recently. I'm not asking for like every single pro players to write their own guides but at least guides that help cover early-to-mid-game stages with strategies related to specific commanders (Like I have heard someone go no volks but with the Breakthrough Doctrine, he just held on with Sturms and Kubel then go for Panzerfusilliers, for example) and just leave the late-game open for discussion (Or as a specific guide for late-game only since most of the time, commanders won't effect your tanks build orders all that much). That just my idea though, and it would take time, of course, but I can wait, no need to rush, and probably a donation system that has been proposed above would help people that actualy put time into a guide feel being appreciated. ‎ In: Lobby
Thread: How to deal with double OKW as Brit26 Aug 2016, 15:40 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Aug 2016, 15:29 PMAsteroth tommies are shit vs this guys even in cover if they rush you. I kind of tested it. The OP troops arrive with 3/4 hp even sometimes loosing a guy against full hp tommies, and they still kill tommies. The Bren Carrier, I haven't used it, but it looks pretty weak right? I have used it once or twice. It looks like its accuracy is too low. And that leaves me with 1 less unit to capture with. Plus this thing is not bullet proof. Sturmpioneers (The Elite sapper one) excel in close-medium range so take long-range to your advantage. Try to avoid close-quarter area (Veto some maps out, I can't truly remembered which are worse for Brits so you have to figure it out yourself. Each time play is a learning experience, heh?) Usually use the first IS squad to rush key-building then move your mg up. Don't too worry about capping back points yet, just lock that key positions (Either fuel point, cut-off or VP) and cap the back points later (Or you could just ask your teammate if he isn't Brits). Also, OKW player usually can't get more than 2 Sturm squads (2 would already be 600 MP investment and it would bleed him a lot) so again, long-range is your friend. Right now, OKW overall is actually weaker than they used to and struggle a lot in 2v2. Pay attention to what tier he choose: ‎ - If he go the Medic HQ, his lack of light vehicles would be his downfall. Your IS with Brens will make a short work of killing the OKW infantry. Rush for a Cromwell (Centaur could work but against infantry only) as early as possible and you are good to go! ‎ - If he go the Mech HQ, then expecting an early Luch. The best bet is to get the AEC, but if your fuel situation isn't going well then AT gun (Always need AT guns for late-game). ‎ Since it's 2v2 we're talking here so remember to always try to get a mortar pit up. That consistent MP bleed towards the OKW player would basically kills him. A side note: You seem to be new here so let get this straight: When you lose a game, upload it here and ask the strategists here for help. Those guys make take some time to get to your gameplays but when they do, believe me, you can always trust them! And unless you're not sure about this unit vs that unit or the stats and such, etc. (Which you seem to not know much when saying Commandos and Brens-equipped IS are weak against Sturmpioneer) then don't state them OP or anything of the sort. You're only embarrasing yourself here. Come here with the idea of you wanting to learn and improving your gameplay and you'll get what you want.‎ EDIT: Oh you haven't try the UC yet? Then try it now! You might think that its accuracy and survivability are not great but it's a vehicle! You won't get MP bleed when using this thing, while infantry can drop models and lead to MP bleed. Again, each time you play, consider it as a learning experience, try out new things, new tactics or could even be just a strange idea of your own! But still do your best! If you lose, however, then ask for help.‎ ‎ ‎ In: UKF Strategies