Profile of William Christensen

i hope this will be out of scope forever

As much as I want it to be real , I just can't stand waiting for 10 minutes for a 7-minute game... Like, how come searching for a 1v1 sometimes take just as long (or even longer) as searching for a 2v2... I thought fewer players needed = quicker search...‎

OK, this guy did the T2 upgrade... But the building didn't build up. He can't reupgraded also so be careful to all of those British players out there... He might be the first and only, but I can't be sure... Just be careful while playing brits.

Holy Jesus Christ! Finally done with all of those bullsh*ts! Double Bren-wielded ISs, Royal Engineers spam, Double FFs to Croc,etc... All f*cking done!! Win with 1 GOD DAMN TICKET left! ONE!! ... What a bloody relieve!... Oh yeah, Panzergrenadiers with ambush camo shredding infantries like Stormtroopers! Improvised Stormtrooper, that is .

P/s: The map is Bryansk Forest. Man, how long was that? Like 1 hour of pains and suffers...

Combine with hull down for the lulz.

It had happened to me in a recent 1v1... Definitely gonna do it again! Like, a literal strategy : Go Festung Armour for Pak 43 + Panzer Tactician + Hull-down the Ostwind at main fighting ground. A 50-range hull-downed Ostwind that can suppress incoming infantries and shred them to pieces. However, still, what is the statistic though? ‎

Wehrmacht emphasizes way more on combine arms and support weapons play. Their strength relies on their support weaponry and their units being rather defensive/static (They also have some of the best abilities, both on units and commanders, in the game and if utilize well, can make a big difference). Their combat infantries are meant to support/cover their support weapons and hardly can they stand a chance against Allies' infantries without their support weaponry. In my opinion, they are meant to be played defensively; they can be aggressive, but an effective aggressive Wehr hardly can be as good as an effective defensive Wehr.

OKW, on the other hand, is the complete opposite of what Wehrmacht is meant to be. They emphasize on mobility, durability and raw firepower. Their combat infantries are very durable, can fight on their own without the needs of support weapons (With the exception of AT guns cause every faction needs it anyways) while at the same time, their support weapons are way weaker compared to their Wehrmacht's counterparts.

For example, Obers will shred every single infantry in the game thanks to their extremely strong raw firepower comes from their MG34. On the other hand, Stormtroopers, upgraded with 4 StG44s, may seems like a slightly-better Panzergrenadiers... Well, the thing makes them different is Tactical Advance, if well set-up, can even helps Stormtroopers win a 1v2 engagement.

Asking "who is better" is not really a question anyone should ask. It should be "which one fit my playstyle?". If you're more of a defensive player, with the love of utilizing many abilities at the right time and getting highly rewarded from good executed flanks and combine arms then Wehrmacht is the choice for you. On the other hand, if you just love punching through the enemy line with strength and strong raw firepower, then OKW is your choice.

(Just for me, I would pick the Wehrmacht over OKW, cause it fits my slow-pace, defensive playstyle)‎