Profile of Felinewolfie

They will in the future. They need money first to build something like that.

I also want to be able to jump to 3d play any unit mid-game.
Sort of like BF5 Even a Plane!!!

Sure, but buff Stug range so it can trade max range shots with allied TD without having to move closer to the battle line. Also buff armor and HP on the half-track and scout car to compensate for the extra exposure to hostile fire.

E: also buff mortar range.

Ostheer is outranged on all fronts by the allies which forces them to attack standoff players. Being able to see what you *have* to assault beforehand is the major reason scopes are the way they are.

==========
- OST demanded Brit mortar pit range be reduced.
To balance things, everyone's mortar (inc OST) range was reduced.
- OST/OKW demanded Allied TDs be nerfed. They were nerfed and Panther's armor and Hulldown and
Command tank were all nerfed.
- StuG could eat allied heavies solo (while being cheaper than a T34) and as such was nerfed.

- You asking StuG to NOW be buffed...
Do you want StuG range buffed to 60 so that allied TD range be buffed to 80?
Do you want StuG power buffed so that ALL allied vehicle armor be buffed?
Allies have X, so axis should have it too.

... Do you want all axis and allies to have the same unit stats? For the entire game to be mirror stats?

Units are supposed to have pros and cons. If they're all pros, then it no longer is a game.
It falls into non-brainer.

If STUG have same cost, but AT of Panther, range of Jackson and HE of Sturmtiger, with a turret and
3x MGs of Pz4 but with front armor of Brummbarr...

... Would anyone do anything else?

Your comment is like hey : Scissors rock vs paper, but if you make it immune to rock and able
to rape other scissors AND rocks, then it'd feel just right. Oh, and keep it cheaper than enemy
units also

... Bias, anyone?

While i certainly like this unit being a glass kannon, which can trade effectivly due to ist low cost, i still think it might need a nittle adjustment.

I feel like this unit doesnt add up when fighting bigger armor, IS2/ISU. espcially against an ISU the lack of range and penetration and possibility to flank makes the stug a bit akward to use. I would suggest a small penetration buff for the stug to compensate.

What bothers me the most however is the awkward vet1 ability, it takes so long to pull of while doing less dmg then a regular shot. Most of the times ist just better to shoot a regular shot and pray for Damage then this. Either reduce the aim time, or replace it with a supression ability that could function similar to
the USA paratrooper one

----------
This unit is low-tech (T2) And cheaper than a T34.
For High end Allied Armor, you use the Panther. Which can eat a Pershing Solo.
It used to eat everything allied solo and win easily doing so.

They nerfed it so you couldn't do that anymore. Please adjust.
Every vehicle medium and below : Use StuG. It still eats Churchill and any KV-Family tank.
So be a man. Make a Panther.

Would you expect anything else from the title? This are the kind of post which helps you reinforce your opinion about they type of bias each people have here.

Allies/Axis OP, they have X so we need it for balance. You can have X if you give us Y. The only interesting thing i saw here is discussing the mechanics regarding putting a building in flames. Which should accomplish similar results.

For example: you could reduce the time to set aflame a building to half but reduce in a similar fashion the damage it deals to the building itself so the end result is the same. Only now you wouldn't need to waste so much time in order for the building to catch on fire.

==================

Seriously, thank you.
I couldn't have said it better

+1

There was a time when some of the Axis grenades destroyed buildings. It was nerfed out and shouldn't come back.

I did a little testing and found that Pio's can burn down most buildings in 1 to 1 1/2 minutes. At some point, the building starts burning and the engineer doesn't have to attack it anymore. Buffing the flame damage to a building so that it only takes 45 seconds to one minute to start on fire would be fine. As a counter, make it so that if an engineer starts repairing before it burns down then the flames would get put out.

I think my problem with this, and a lot of the other threads, is the premise that if any of the allied faction has something, then all axis need it. USF doesn't get non-doctrinal flamers, advanced medium tanks, a heavy tank, rocket arty (and even the one doctrinal was nerfed into uselessness), non-doc elite infantry, a super TD (doctrinal or not), etc, etc.

==========
- They want everything allies have, especially the ability to pop out of tanks,
and repair them via tank crew - And scope - And smoke popping - and Flag capture.
Dual BAR/BREN.
- But mirror stat factions are not acceptable.
... But god forbid allies have anything axis have. Like LMG42 upgrade free, without needing
weapon racks to run back to. Also, LMG42 is stronger than either BAR or BREN.
So two of those... They also want 5x men squads on Grenadier.

They already have double Panzershrek upgrades (for cheaper!) compared to dual Bazookas.
(100 muni, no tech cost) vs (120 muni, has fuel tech cost - and is weaker).

They don't want balance. Because then, Allies would need access to Axis toys too.
(Katyusha that fires 16x rockets tightly grouped, with huge AOE of Stuka HT) - It having free MG
and being tougher than a delicate kleenex.