Profile of A big guy 4u

I have been wondering why there was no su-100 for a long time now. It really isn't fair how Germany gets late war armor and Russia gets mid war armor.

Because Soviets is not a profitable faction and relic focuses on milking their cash cows (OKW and UKF)

-No Su-122
-No Su-100
-No BS-3 100 MM AT gun

The fundamental chronology of the tech is broken after they introduced OKW, which is 1944-1945 wunderwaffe unlimited, and UKF too. Comet almost never saw action. Both these factions get late war tech, USF is 1944 too but their units are not unreasonable.

Soviets get stuck in mid 1942-43. Why? Because fuck you give us money!

HOWEVER I will admit that before the ardennes offensive DLC, the wehr vs soviet armor matchup was not that one sided , but then again the balance was even more messed up in those days

5 stars dont fucking matter when the levels of vet are the same as 3 star. Didn't you read the patch notes where Relic nerfed the vet bonuses essentially making 5 stars basically the same rewards as 3 stars when they gave OKW 100% resources.

-Obers can suppress at vet 5, at vet 4 they have permanent sprint.
-stuka reload gets very fast as they vet.
-Vet 5 volks become anti-everything with AT.
-Sturmpio have stun grenades.

The same? The same? I don't see shocks get permanent sprint and supression at vet 3.

Katyusha doesn't fire in single salvo or have incendiary at vet 3.

Cons that survive into vet 3 dont become anti-everything with AT.

Your argument is so full of bias.

okwNEW AND EXCITING DEVELOPMENTokw

Just came out of a game, and emplacements are disgustingly easy to deal with as OKW:

-Build healing halftrack
-Survive until mid game (duh, you are OKW, you must survive until mid game, fool!)
-Don't deploy flak halftrack, build 2 stukas instead (I must stress at least TWO)
-Build infrared halftrack
-Fire 1 stuka at emplacement
-Brit player will brace after (or if he is alert, during) that hit of course
-Then he sends engineers
-Fire second halftrack
-All units take extra damage when building or rpeairing (unless vet 3 but no one has vet 3 engineers) so squad wipe guaranteed. Bonus points if they send 2 or 3 engineers!
-No more engineers, he either builds more (a game which he will lose)or leave the emplacements to their fate (He also loses)

You need to have allies with good armor (Any Axis player who is not stupid will have good armor) or at least 1 KT of your own to scare any foolish attempt by the allies using their paper tanks.

I believe this single strategy will make UKF emplacement entirely unusable and just destroy their defensive gameplay.


I have the utmost confidence that this blatant exploitation of rockets will never be addressed by relic and thus will always be viable.

And I don't care if UKF fanboys hate me for it because I never play UKF.

Note: Also works if you supply the armor + infrared and wehr supplies the rockets!

OR you could engage in a skillful and intense game of counter-to-counter using combined arms, strategic maneuvers, exciting tank battles, infantry and armor coordination and all round skill, but that is for fools, this is much better for your stats and leaderboard rankings, plus all you need to do is point, click, and retreat!

Disclaimer: Does not work in 1 vs 1, but British are always outnumbered in 1 vs 1, blob early instead!

USF already manpower starved. Light vehicle play is supposed to be one of their pillars of survival.

No. No price increase to anything in USF.

Soviets have virtually no tank.

T-34/76 is an OK, but slightly overpriced, generalist, but it cannot compete in late game.

The SU-85 is a good tank sniper, but it is no tank and is more of a defensive tool than an offensive one. Without tank cover it is very vulnerable, and soviet infantry lacks the AT weapons that every other faction has to screen TD's.

Making the '85 non doctrinal would make the Soviets much more competitive and balanced. Tank engagements will no longer be so one-sided.

It's about time I think.