Profile of whitesky00

Just correcting terminology. It's not good at "sniping" models as that was not changed in the patch. All it got was an aoe buff/damage. It's value at sniping models remain the same but repeated AOE hits will kill a model. So it probably needs a aoe debuff since it's value was changed to be too high. Probably never noticed the "sniping" before because nobody used it before. Bofors was the preference then but why get a bofors now when you can have aoe on the move?

Meanwhile people build 222s every single game, while nobody builds m20s. OH WAIT. NOPE haha. Bulletproof armor and free bar thomspon squad > shithole paper mache 222 that can't counter anything but an m3 scoutcar.

Go show me a side by side comparison of an m20 and a 222 vs a gren squad or a sniper.

Do it yourself and show it on here to prove a point.

Let's give this a more defined role. At the moment it's literal garbage, even vs m20 due to crew disembark with zookas it fails to counter it. AEC 2 shots it. It even struggles to kill infantry before being pushed away by small arms. The only thing this is good for is M3/Jeep hunting, which is pathetic for a t2 unit.

I think this should be buffed considerably along with a price increase to 50 or so fuel, make it on par with AEC/Stuart to give Ost a reliable light vehicle.

Just like miraflages post. Not every faction gets everything. UKF/USF has no mobile artillery except through commanders. OST doesn't have a light tank unless it's through a commander. Just wondering if this community wants to make an all in one faction that has MGs, snipers, mortars, mainline infantry with mgs and vehicle snare, light scout tank, medium tanks, heavy tanks, rocket artillery... what else? non-doc super heavies next?

If you're having trouble with 222 vs m20... why would you have trouble vs a m20? the moment the crew disembarks, you just stay at range and attack the vehicle while the crew has crap accuracy at range/aim time. Kite, destroy the vehicle, retreat. And you do know the m20 costs 340 MP and 20 fuel + 70 muni for the armor upgrade? I believe the 222 is cheaper and counters a more expensive unit.

This community talks about differentiating factions. Now I see a demand for homogeneity? "I want a vehicle that performs like other factions' light tanks."

The 222 is a niche vehicle that can scout, AA, chase snipers, chase light vehicles (not light tanks). It is not designed to be a bullet sponge so don't use it that way.

Here's the description:
Light, mobile vehicle that is strong against enemy infantry and light vehicles at range. Counters Soviet scout cars, weapon teams, and snipers.

http://www.coh2.org/guides/2573/german-unit-guide

Veterancy:
-30% cooldown WHEN IN COVER,+50% Reload WHEN IN COVER
Construction/Repair Rate increased by 30%
Reinforce cost reduced by 50%,received accuracy -33%

Size/RA: 0.8
Bonus while in light/heavy cover: 0.9

IIRC
+1 armor with upgrade (for reference shocks are 1.5)

With upgrades n in cover, toughest squad ingame.

Thanks for the info. I didn't know they had extra armor since i never use them. In that case, i'd agree with a debuff of the armor... I didn't even know they still used those values except for shocktroopers. I thought they were revolving everything around "received accuracy" these days.

love this idea

wouldn't this just destroy SOV T1 M3 and UKF carrier?

I don't know the values but I think the pak40 one-shots or reduces hp by 95%

New OST build order, 1 MG, 1 pak40 at the beginning of game. Engis sight, MG suppress, pak kills vehicles. Point lock down the moment the game begins...