I don't know why the hell you are deflecting obvious issues with UKF contrasted with Ost or OKW by bringing up BARS or USF here
Nobody is arguing BARS or rifleman upgrades or tech is overpriced. In fact if Brits had BARS or StG profile weapons instead of lackluster brens and cover gimmicks a lot of their issues with underpowered IS would be gone overnight.
Stay on topic or you're just digging your irrelevant argument into a deeper hole. It's already deep enough which is why so you have so many replies saying you're wrong.
On a more serious note, UKF brens and PIATS are locked behind another MP/fuel investment. So are the grenades. What is the problem here? Meanwhile spending 60 muni on a game-long STG or LMG upgrade is not a big deal whatsoever. Infantry Sections also require munitions for pyro or heal upgrade so your argument of Infantry Sections not needing upgrades being a huge snowball balance killer is just grasping at straws.
Infantry Sections were OP, they deserved a nerf but literally EVERYTHING but not this awkward back to camp-static gameplay change that no one wanted.
i was on topic , when people says "why ukf pays for upgrade while axis doesn't ?" spreading fake propaganda , i will point it out
btw bren is not lack cluster, it has around 25% less power alone than a lmg 42 but it cost 25% less 45 vs 60 (to be more precise it has 23% less damage at long and 27% at close, 7 vs 9 long and 4 vs 5,5 at close)
if u want my opinion on how to fix them, just make the 5 men upgrade cost munition and occupy slot then buff base IS , no more power spike