Profile of Stug life

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 4474

General Information


Thread: tier 0 and tier 1 OKW rework 5 Jul 2019, 16:21 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2019, 14:28 PMLago These sort of unit changes are probably too extensive for a rework Relic would actually implement. The USF rework is more the scale we can expect at this point. well i just shifted the tier around and swapped weapon for the volks, if the sturm are to complicated just leave them alone or make the starting one start with mp 40s (or maybe the MP cut is enough) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: tier 0 and tier 1 OKW rework 4 Jul 2019, 15:30 PM So to address the most problematic faction in game right now I propose a wide rework on early game that will fix their oppression and clunky units Tier 0 units) removed 100 mp from starting man power, trucks cost changed from 100 mp to 50 mp stormpioneer: stg weapons changed to MP-40s cost from 300 to 240, upgrade AT package: 100 munitions 2 panzer shreck and ability to plant teller mines, anti garrison package:100 man power upgrade mp 40s to sturm STG and give a 10 seconds cool down FREE incendiary grenade, sweeper package: 40 muni give sweeper and 1 more man(and maybe add some repair speed if the extra man is not enough) volksgrenadier: STG upgrade exchanged for the mp 40 upgrade, incendiary grenade removed for normal one, added a 1.15 accuracy bonus at vet 2, 1.10 received accuracy bonus at vet 1 pupchen: removed in exchange for pak 38 (a black skinned version of the pak 40 if there are no models), same stats as the American m1-57 anti tank gun, first strike bonus changed to 300 % more penetration for the first shoot(vet changed accordingly), range to 60, removed ability to retreat Tier 1 units) infrared half-track moved to tier 2, obers moved from tier 3 to tier 1, mg34 upgrade locked only after 2 trucks set up Tier 2 units) stuka half-track moved to tier 3 (i'm unsure of this change but it would led to less people using the mech opening) this aim to remove the early power and giving units more specialized and defined roles, making their most complained unit having real roles while their most unreliable unit come earlier or make them reliable to make this fair some changes would be need to the commanders firestorm doctrine exchange the mp-40s for 3 STG upgrade(instead of 2) and the ability for volks to use incendiary grenades (in theme with the doc) the new Pfusilier might need some changes too, maybe giving them 4 AT rifles and the ability to plant AT mines or keep their snare (so they are almost the same as penal with PTRS) and making them start at 6 man and not 5,like now In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AVRE and StumTiger need rework？4 Jul 2019, 12:04 PM when people says sturm tiger is good minute 6 to see In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New USF doctrine is too good2 Jul 2019, 21:16 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jul 2019, 20:18 PMKatitof Have you considered engaging 3 zook rangers with ... I don't know ... infantry? well yes, but they are really hard to hit and the smoke sprint + zook ranger are the problem not the ranger themselves, if they can skip my mg and reach sonic speed i can't do much as tank can't out run them In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-152 needs some love.2 Jul 2019, 21:13 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jul 2019, 20:31 PMthedarkarmadillo I wouldn't say exceptional simply due to the slow ROF. Good? For sure but not great. If there are no soft targets it can definitely semi reliability help with armour and that's more than most AI tanks can say is 3 more sec than elfant is bad ? btw 240 damage if pen and 120 if it does not is still very good In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New USF doctrine is too good2 Jul 2019, 20:03 PM i mean as a comparison if a 280 mp doc unit is op cause it has 2 sherck and no AI then a 200 mp with much more utility and 2 zook would just be a down scalled more spammable version so it would be op as every 3 u would get another rear echelon, so no the pfusiler are fine, it's just the PTSD kicking in a)obv, but they can still kill 1 shreck squad alone even then t 34 are really cheap b)well if he brings 2-3 pgreen with shreck vs 1 of ur tank that's 640-900mp and 200-300 muni vs 300-340mp and 90-110 fu, i think at that point u are just outnumbered and out resourced In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger Ace uniqueness 2 Jul 2019, 19:56 PM i feel it's already pretty unique with the abilities, more health and more accuracy In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-152 needs some love.2 Jul 2019, 19:54 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jul 2019, 19:45 PMthedarkarmadillo Isu as an AI unit that CAN fight tanks. That's a bonus not its job. There is no reason for it to be absolutely exceptional at it, although even now it is rather good. If you need AT the su85 is one of the best YDs in the game.. it's exceptional at it too tho, not as elephant but really it's almost there, it has 120 deflection damage so even if it's pen is at normal TD lvl it's still very strong and obv the 70 range In: COH2 Balance
Thread: For the Love Of God M1 Pack Howitzer 2 Jul 2019, 19:28 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jul 2019, 18:52 PMLago If it's a mortar, leave it alone. If it's meant to serve as a rocket artillery equivalent, make it like the Land Mattress. Remove the auto-attack and give it a powerful, wide area, extended duration barrage that forces the enemy to reposition. it should work like a LFEH, more range no AA, extensive barrage with modest CD In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-152 needs some love.2 Jul 2019, 18:53 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jul 2019, 18:39 PMWingZero ISU is definitely meta in team games. I just think its anti tank capabilities are garbage for its price. I would rather just see this more like KV2. -Weapon penetration from 200/180/160 to 170/150/140 -Deflection damage to 50% it has worse pen than isu 152 but same deflection damage In: COH2 Balance