Profile of Stug life

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 4474

General Information


Thread: Soviet September patch discussion23 Aug 2019, 17:28 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Aug 2019, 16:49 PMAcidfreak Hi. All it takes is 2 volley of shrecks from early pzgren and its gone. And at guns hit it easily. The little time i have spent in this forum im amazed at axis bias. Like seriously you are here to ask for nerfs to only good unit soviets have? And that to in early to mid game. right now it's more dangerous to leave a squad in front of a t70 than a tiger, while still being a good LV and LT counter btw to me u seem pretty biased ur self considering if u check the 3 last pages of posts, it's all about buffing allies and nerfing axis, people pretty much ignore or shoot down any buff or rework for axis (the RE thread has more reply than the mobile defense one and we all know which is used and which is a jk ) if thus forum was biased as u said u would see a ton of "allies are Op" thread NAD mod would ban all pro allies thread to me it seems the opposite tho In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF AT grenades23 Aug 2019, 17:16 PM i don't understand why it takes so long tho wouldn't it just be easier to copy the Soviet at nades and be done with it ? they are pretty responsive In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW September patch discussion23 Aug 2019, 16:04 PM they could make faust come after first truck call in like flame nade if u want to make the puppchen come later In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion23 Aug 2019, 16:02 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Aug 2019, 16:00 PMJilet Then I think I need to memorize all 6 years patch notes. Do you even belive cons are good vet1 ? yes i do believe they have a good vet 1, compare it with gren, volks, rifle or IS only rifle or volks come close to RA + cheap AI mine+ flare vs either 2% more RA or at nades gren still get the jk medical kits and IS get vision in cover i say it's comparable or better than volks and rifle In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion23 Aug 2019, 15:58 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Aug 2019, 15:57 PMJilet I read. Nothing on cons early. If you are considering T3 as early then what can I say Conscripts are being adjusted to deal more reliable damage and have some capability of scaling into the late game by bleeding infantry at range when fighting from defensive positions. Damage from 16 to 12 Accuracy from 0.541/0.495/0.334 to 0.757/0.659/0.556 Max slot weapons from 2 to 1; no impact on Conscript upgrades Trip-Wire flares now have a 30 second cooldown Orrah cost from 10 to 15 Molotov cost from 15 to 20; only affects Conscripts Veterancy 1 now grants 0.92 received accuracy Veterancy 2 +25% Molotov range replaced by faster Molotov throw speed Veterancy 3 now grants +10% accuracy modifier Veterancy 3 Received accuracy from 0.6 to 0.707 they already shifted vet 3 RA to vet 1, please actually read the patch notes, this was 3 years ago In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion23 Aug 2019, 15:23 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Aug 2019, 14:52 PMJilet No thats because OST is going T1 for that build. I agree SOV T2 is weak but considering Shocks/Guards at 2 CP and penals at T1 it seems a little fair. I would gladly agree changing cons veterancy and flares. >Split the cons vet3 RA between vet1 and vet3 (10/30 respectively) thus make them more viable early and scale easier >Give the tripwire flare behind molotov >Nerf the penal RA improve their PTRS vs tanks so they are glass cannons early but potent at unit later >Improve the maxim suppression to vickers levels but nerf its pack/set up times. >Reduce ZiS to 300 MP. I guess this is more appealing to every SOV player. hey guys how about actually reading the patch notes ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW September patch discussion23 Aug 2019, 14:49 PM we could fix this problem by copy pasting usf at gun tho In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion23 Aug 2019, 14:04 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Aug 2019, 14:02 PMgbem if you think ostheer underperforms wait till you see stock soviet T2 builds... 4 grens + mg42 + pio vs 4 cons a maxim and a CE is absolutely NOT a fair fight... and note that the former costs 50 MP less (since soviet teching is more expensive) GBEM nobody is saying other wise, u are not a victim and everyone in the forum is not against u no need to spam that tier 2 is weak every post In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion23 Aug 2019, 14:00 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Aug 2019, 13:57 PMDangerous-Cloth What do vehicles have to do with 4 model mainline non doc infantry squads getting wiped too easily? You want to argue that a T70 is weak lol? Or a Su76 is weak and does not perform well vs Ostheer tier 3 units? You want to argue that the Su85 is bad? he is obv saying the t34 does not have 200 armor even tho it costs 30 less fuel than a p4 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion23 Aug 2019, 13:55 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Aug 2019, 13:53 PMgbem because there are sentiments here to buff ost "because it underperforms in tournaments"... yes these are very much viable sentiments... but there is another... id guess you could call it a subfaction (sov t2) that functions arguably worse than even ost... and yet gets some scrappy halfhearted buff while ost receives all the time in the spotlight the 251 buff is a great example to this... weve been asking for soviet M5 buffs to give it healing aswell quite some time ago... especially since sov T2 absolutely needs field healing to offset some of its major deficiencies... but of course instead of give the M5 field healing the SDKFZ 251 is the one to recieve it instead... and though ostheer buffs are pretty neat... the blatant lack of attention the balance team is giving to the even more underperforming sov T2 is just complete bullcrap... then cry to mod not me dude In: COH2 Balance