Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - USF Feedback19 May 2021, 22:27 PM Jump back to quoted post19 May 2021, 21:55 PMJilet I'm not saying give them LMGs. I'm saying it would be cool if we had the option to choose between Thompsons and long range scoped rifles or something like camouflage. Rangers should have some sort of utility at least like a smoke. There are tons of options for them but we have their worst iteration probably. Here are some ideas: > Give them another upgrade for long range like JLI sniper. > Give them sprint and/or smoke grenades. > Give them camouflage. > Give them demo charges. > Make them benefit from riflemen field defenses. and many more ideas can be created for them rather than the 3 zook carrier dullness. The real problem is not "Rangers "dullness", it is every other unit power creeping and becoming like Rangers... SMG units like rangers should have an ability that boosted their durability for limited time. They the player would have to decided when to use that ability instead of yoling into a fight. There is even a good name for it "lead the way" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - USF Feedback19 May 2021, 21:04 PM Jump back to quoted post19 May 2021, 21:03 PMJilet I know, yet the role stays the same. Its just until you buy thompsons or 3 zooks on them. I'm talking about an actual side upgrade like para MGs as a long range upgrade. Making them overlap with Paras makes little sense. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - USF Feedback19 May 2021, 21:02 PM Jump back to quoted post19 May 2021, 21:00 PMJilet What I find rather dull is the Rangers. Literally 0 abilities other than the grenade and I think 10 pop for a squad that the only shiny part is 3 weapon slots is weird to me. Especially considering their description of marksmanship etc. maybe they can get some sort of long range marksmen upgrade like a better pathfinder like JLI or something that makes them long range elite infantry. They do get different rifles in the patch.... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - USF Feedback19 May 2021, 21:01 PM Jump back to quoted post19 May 2021, 20:40 PMProtos Angelus The only reason Urban is popular is because the USF has an incomplete stock roster. The fact remain is one of the most popular with a big difference regardless of reason. One of the goal of this patch should be to close these gap between commander and thus Urban defence does not need a buff. Jump back to quoted post19 May 2021, 20:40 PMProtos Angelus Not because it's got some magical units in it. Never claim the commander has some magical units in it. Fact remains that far more popular than Tactical support so it really really really does not need any buffs. Jump back to quoted post19 May 2021, 20:40 PMProtos Angelus Judging by the last time we played together, you should be asking for Mega Buffs for USF. And judging from the fact that you seem to play 1 single mode with single faction you should probably listen to who play all factions more or maybe you should avoid personal comments. Unless you want to argue that Urban defense needs a buff I suggest you move on. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - USF Feedback19 May 2021, 18:59 PM Jump back to quoted post19 May 2021, 18:38 PMEtherealDragon ... It would also be a nice little buff to Urban Assault where Calliopes are the same way and require RE repairs. Last thing Urban defense needs is buff since it already one of most popular commander about to become even more popular once Dozer Sherman are no longer available to another commander. The commander need nerf not buffs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback19 May 2021, 18:37 PM Imo Concrete bunker should be look at. The seem to take too much damage from "light weapons" like molotovs, MGs especially with AP round like 0.5/Dhsk. I would also would rather have build without the mg/repair and have those available as an upgrade. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing vs Tiger. Shouldn't Pershing be buffed?19 May 2021, 12:17 PM Jump back to quoted post19 May 2021, 11:35 AMredfox Guys, this is becoming offtopic. @Vipper: What's your take on the proposed Pershing reduction cost or MG pintle addition/armor to 300 buff to reflect it having the same price as the tiger? One could test bringing the price to that of the Command Panther at 520/200, can't see any reason for a lower price than that , especially when Croc cost 630/230. Any change should be minor. It will still not make much difference is diversifying USF commanders since AB and UA the top choices remain as strong (or even stronger). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing vs Tiger. Shouldn't Pershing be buffed?19 May 2021, 11:30 AM Jump back to quoted post19 May 2021, 08:58 AMtheekvn dont push words into my mouth. thanks If in your opinion I have misrepresented in any pls explain which "People are too stupid". Jump back to quoted post19 May 2021, 08:58 AMtheekvn using panther is easier than Jpz4 due to the nature of those tank. Panther can easilly shut down Alies genaral tanks alone so OKW or even Weh can pay mirco tax to another unit. Panther can do more than rather than anti tank duty too. Pls explain in your opinion which TD is better Panther or JPIV. Because so far according to you Panther is easier to use and can do more while JP need to be fully supported. And since this is about Pershing, Panther is better at dealing with Pershing. As for your suggestion for M26 to have a crew that is not going to happen because it would be exploited to by the limit of 1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing vs Tiger. Shouldn't Pershing be buffed?19 May 2021, 08:09 AM Jump back to quoted post19 May 2021, 01:48 AMtheekvn ...People are too stupid to know how good Jpz4 is because Panther require less mirco, less brain cells. ... Can we pls stop insulting players. The theory that anyone and everyone who plays OKW is "too stupid" is not really realistic or even helpful. It also indicates that the person who repeats has not single game as OKW. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback18 May 2021, 23:56 PM Jump back to quoted post18 May 2021, 23:53 PMdonofsandiego Like I said, I don't consider shell switching to be a disadvantage in the totality of the unit, but in a situation such as this the Sherman is undeniably at a disadvantage. Is it a major one? Likely not so much. But it is a disadvantage nonetheless. And yes, you could certainly drive everywhere with AP rounds loaded just in case a tank comes out of nowhere, but is that reasonable? I would think that HE rounds would be preferable because of the potential to wipe being a lot higher. Honestly I don't know. My brain isn't big enough to have tried engaging enemy infantry squads with AP rounds to be completely honest. To me it seems like it would be inefficient. It nice to see that you seem agree that "switchable munitions" argument as reason to buff the AP does not hold water. The rest is simply out of context and I see little reason to debate especially in this thread, it also seems to move the debate away from it purpose. As I posted even when 76mm was patched for the first time I would rather see the 76mm come at the same price as 75mm Sherman and be balanced accordingly having a more AT role. In: COH2 Balance